Comments on: What Kind of Justice Would President Obama Mete Out? http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:15:45 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Commentary » Blog Archive » Which Kind Of Justice? http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-2/#comment-142877 Commentary » Blog Archive » Which Kind Of Justice? Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:31:13 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-142877 [...] who aren’t in the fairness business. Unfortunately, he has made crystal clear that he sees no merit (outside an eleventh hour TV interview) in that [...] [...] who aren’t in the fairness business. Unfortunately, he has made crystal clear that he sees no merit (outside an eleventh hour TV interview) in that [...]

]]> By: Commentary » Blog Archive » Not Just About Abortion http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-2/#comment-133963 Commentary » Blog Archive » Not Just About Abortion Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:00:52 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-133963 [...] ban on the most extreme and gruesome procedure (partial birth abortion). Rather, he excoriated the Supreme Court for upholding the legislative judgment of Congress. Is there any doubt that if given his way he [...] [...] ban on the most extreme and gruesome procedure (partial birth abortion). Rather, he excoriated the Supreme Court for upholding the legislative judgment of Congress. Is there any doubt that if given his way he [...]

]]> By: Ignore what he says | Stop Him Now Blog http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-1/#comment-72019 Ignore what he says | Stop Him Now Blog Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:42:17 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-72019 [...] Ginsburg, Breyer, and Stevens are Obama’s ideal judges. And we know that he generally wants judges who will roam around the jurisprudential landscape seeking to impose their own personal morality [...] [...] Ginsburg, Breyer, and Stevens are Obama’s ideal judges. And we know that he generally wants judges who will roam around the jurisprudential landscape seeking to impose their own personal morality [...]

]]> By: Commentary » Blog Archive » In Case You Were Confused http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-1/#comment-71946 Commentary » Blog Archive » In Case You Were Confused Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:46:34 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-71946 [...] Ginsburg, Breyer, and Stevens are Obama’s ideal judges. And we know that he generally wants judges who will roam around the jurisprudential landscape seeking to impose their own personal morality [...] [...] Ginsburg, Breyer, and Stevens are Obama’s ideal judges. And we know that he generally wants judges who will roam around the jurisprudential landscape seeking to impose their own personal morality [...]

]]> By: Lost in Translation | Catholic Exchange http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-1/#comment-67808 Lost in Translation | Catholic Exchange Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:01:59 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-67808 [...] Mr. Senior Lecturer in Constitutional Law tried to blunt that critique by saying that Dobson had been “making stuff up,” which is not a smart way to take issue with a man whose web site links to a transcript of the speech you are talking about. Apart from the argument over whether Obama was really just saying that “people of faith” need to speak in a “universal language” that promotes “open and vigorous debate,” the speech and its aftermath are also notable for other reasons. As George Neumayr pointedly observed, Obama mistakenly assumes that secularism is synonymous with reason, while religion is what happens when “mere opinion” ponders Big Questions like “is that all there is?” Both propositions are ahistorical, and both have been refuted many times over. [...] [...] Mr. Senior Lecturer in Constitutional Law tried to blunt that critique by saying that Dobson had been “making stuff up,” which is not a smart way to take issue with a man whose web site links to a transcript of the speech you are talking about. Apart from the argument over whether Obama was really just saying that “people of faith” need to speak in a “universal language” that promotes “open and vigorous debate,” the speech and its aftermath are also notable for other reasons. As George Neumayr pointedly observed, Obama mistakenly assumes that secularism is synonymous with reason, while religion is what happens when “mere opinion” ponders Big Questions like “is that all there is?” Both propositions are ahistorical, and both have been refuted many times over. [...]

]]> By: Commentary » Blog Archive » Outrageous http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-1/#comment-64914 Commentary » Blog Archive » Outrageous Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:42:34 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-64914 [...] methodology, if not the result, is one utterly in keeping with Obama’s judicial philosophy. (Really.) On this list of helpful things for McCain to do he should add: Explain to voters why [...] [...] methodology, if not the result, is one utterly in keeping with Obama’s judicial philosophy. (Really.) On this list of helpful things for McCain to do he should add: Explain to voters why [...]

]]> By: Pajamas Media » McCain-Lieberman Might Be Just the Ticket http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-1/#comment-62593 Pajamas Media » McCain-Lieberman Might Be Just the Ticket Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:40:51 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-62593 [...] revealed to actually satisfy Republicans?) Moreover, this does not solve the issue of potentially 200 lower court judicial [...] [...] revealed to actually satisfy Republicans?) Moreover, this does not solve the issue of potentially 200 lower court judicial [...]

]]> By: last supreme court appointment http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-1/#comment-57769 last supreme court appointment Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:06:47 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-57769 [...] Louisville ... the ???minor leagues??? for future supreme court appointments, will be filled. ...http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/Supreme Court of Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe supreme court of Canada formally [...] [...] Louisville … the ???minor leagues??? for future supreme court appointments, will be filled. …http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/Supreme Court of Canada – Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe supreme court of Canada formally [...]

]]> By: Redmanfms http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-1/#comment-51939 Redmanfms Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:46:40 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-51939 "Take B Dubya for example, Neo Stalinists? What garbage. Only a fascist retard could use such slogans like that seriously." Irony? “Take B Dubya for example, Neo Stalinists? What garbage. Only a fascist retard could use such slogans like that seriously.”

Irony?

]]> By: Redmanfms http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/comment-page-1/#comment-51937 Redmanfms Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:45:30 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-kind-of-justice-would-president-obama-mete-out/#comment-51937 "And I am supposed to take PJ Media and her patrons seriously?" Feel free not to. I suspect that you wouldn't take PJ seriously anyway, since the views expressed here don't fit in with your worldview. You should take note that this conservative-oriented news and opinions site at least allows you and your political brethren to comment and proffer your case, which is a great deal more than can be said about such sites on the left side of the spectrum. “And I am supposed to take PJ Media and her patrons seriously?”

Feel free not to. I suspect that you wouldn’t take PJ seriously anyway, since the views expressed here don’t fit in with your worldview. You should take note that this conservative-oriented news and opinions site at least allows you and your political brethren to comment and proffer your case, which is a great deal more than can be said about such sites on the left side of the spectrum.

]]>