Where in the World is Morgan Spurlock’s Brain?
Documentary filmmaker Morgan Spurlock is looking for Osama Bin Laden. Is it more surprising that he doesn't find him — or that Spurlock's own biases make his film nearly unwatchable?
In the tech world, Moore’s Law says that more computing power will continue to be squeezed into a smaller space. At the cinema, Moore’s Law says that Michael Moore’s success will cause ambitious lefty filmmakers to squeeze more and more tendentious arguments, straw-man attacks, and tasteless jokes into each political documentary. In striving to be even more outrageous than his idol, Morgan Spurlock begins his inane documentary Where in the World Is Osama bin Laden? by making light of the attacks on the World Trade Center.
The film begins with queasy airplane footage in which the clouds largely obscure the city below. Knowing this is a documentary about the Age of Terror going into the film makes you nervous about where Spurlock is heading, but his narration seals the point. Spurlock talks about waking up on a perfect morning, glad to know you’re alive, when suddenly, out of a clear blue sky, everything changes.
Cut. Now we’re in Spurlock’s home, where his wife is telling him (in an obviously staged scene) that she’s pregnant.
This opening is not just childish, smug and unfunny; it’s a hideous affront to people who lost loved ones on those flights to compare their suffering to Spurlock’s supposed shock at finding out he was going to be a daddy. The difference is as stark as death and life, and Spurlock owes the 9/11 families an abject apology.
Where in the World Is Osama bin Laden?, a supposed comedy that also features the Statue of Liberty pictured as a whore, finds Spurlock touring various places in the Arab world and Israel (Morocco, Egypt, the West Bank, Tel Aviv, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and finally Afghanistan and Pakistan) while trying to convince you that Bin Laden, and Bin Ladenism, are no big deal, that our fears of terrorism are slightly ridiculous, and that if only we gave the Islamist world more health care, more education, and maybe a copy of It Takes a Village for every jihadist, we wouldn’t have to worry.
How does Spurlock make this point? By traveling around the Arab world to find scholars, journalists, and activists who believe this. In other words, in intellectual terms he travels the world and magically finds Brooklyn (where he lives). Every so often the film breaks for a little monologue by Spurlock about U.S. evils in which Bin Laden and his henchmen are portrayed as wacky cartoon characters. The film amounts to Al-Qaeda: the Cartoon.
The film, which is padded at the beginning with a silly training montage set to thumping action-movie music of Spurlock learning how to dodge grenades and survive being taken hostage, leads up to a conclusion in which, (again, Spurlock himself is the one who simply delivers the message) we are told, that the Arab people are just like us. There is a montage of smiling Muslims at the end. Surely anyone who smiles isn’t scary.
But the film itself contradicts this notion. Virtually all of Spurlock’s interview subjects veer between chatting about how much they like Americans to ugly and lunatic theories. Two cute, smiley girls Spurlock meets on an Egyptian street seem nice enough until they blurt out, “You want to occupy Egypt. It’s what we hear on TV and stuff.” Another Egyptian says, “We pray to God to destroy you.” A French-speaking woman activist tells him (emphasis mine), “If it really was Osama who did 9/11, he dealt us a bad hand.” (Translation: the CIA or the Jews probably did it).
In Saudi Arabia, when Spurlock gains access to a school, he is given permission to talk to exactly two students. When he asks them what they’ve been taught about Israel, the authorities order him to stop filming.
A relative of one of the 9/11 hijackers interviewed by Spurlock doesn’t believe the official story because “America wins all the Oscar awards” and presumably faked the whole thing.
And these are the people cherry-picked for their reasonableness.
In Israel and the West Bank, Spurlock affects befuddlement that people would choose to build barricades to keep out suicide bombers (”Everywhere you go there’s a wall, there’s a fence, there’s barbed wire”). In Morocco, Spurlock talks about a 2003 bombing and takes us to the shantytown from which the bombers sprang, finding a local intellectual to say that the most important ingredients in breeding terrorism are poverty and lack of education. Spurlock does not mention the obvious retort — that the 9/11 bombers were educated upper-middle class men — but makes it clear that if only the United States would eliminate all poverty from the world, terrorism would evaporate. And the Iraq invasion was too ambitious?
Like most liberals, Spurlock can’t figure out a way to maneuver in the Arab world without soiling the pure, unspoiled ideals of which he never tires of reminding us. In a particularly smug animated sequence in which the Statue of Liberty is portrayed as a stripper/whore and Spurlock says the US has been “pimping out liberty,” he accuses the country of routinely propping up dictatorial regimes in the name of stability. That position puts him on both sides of the Iraq debate. He is against America’s decades-long bipartisan policy of supporting the relatively nonthreatening Mubarak regime in Egypt while trying to gently nudge it along to democracy, but in opposing the current war he implicitly says that that should have been our policy in Iraq. So Hosni Mubarak is evil, but Saddam Hussein was okay.
For a movie with nearly a dozen credited writers, Where in the World Is Osama Bin Laden? offers surprisingly strained attempts at humor. When it isn’t in bad taste, it is simply weak. For instance, Spurlock sits down with a phone book in Riyadh and starts randomly calling Bin Ladens, walks through a shopping mall in Saudi Arabia asking people whether they’ve seen Osama and, in Tora Bora, walks around shouting “Yoo-hoo! Osama!” into caves. Spurlock, who back in New York City lives in the crosshairs of radical Islam, has unintentionally proven that there is nothing particularly funny about the terrorist threat.
Where in the World Is Osama bin Laden?
Directed by Morgan Spurlock
1 star out of 4
93minutes/Rated PG-13
Kyle Smith is a film critic for the the New York Post. His website is at www.kylesmithonline.com.
![]() |
![]() |
Podcasts | PJM Home |





PJM Home


Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
8 Comments
1. Review: “Where in the World Is Osama Bin Laden?” | KyleSmithOnline.com:[...] Morgan Spurlock’s new comedy-documentary “Where in the World Is Osama Bin Laden?” opens with a joke about the World Trade Center attacks. Yep, that’s about the level of taste we’re discussing here. My review is up. [...]
Apr 18, 2008 - 6:54 am 2. Saltherring:We already have a congressional majority dominated by moveon.org types. Could the presidency be next? If so, it will be perhaps the first time I fear my own government more than any foreign entity.
Apr 18, 2008 - 7:02 am 3. Dave:The naivite of the left is astounding sometimes.
This movie only proves the point, and in trying to be “funny” while reducing the problem of Islamic terrorism to a big joke of a movie, Spurlock has done what many on the left accuse conservatives of doing…reducing a complex problem to it’s most basic and, in the process, absurd conclusions.
Of course, in this movie, the complex “problem” is America and it’s policies…NOT jihadists who would gladly murder many hundreds more of his fellow innocent New Yorkers if given half a chance!
Apr 18, 2008 - 3:39 pm 4. tanstaafl:…that the 9/11 bombers were educated upper-middle class men —
Well, the leaders were.
The followers weren’t.
The followers might not even have known that their own deaths was part of the plan. Filmmakers traveling around the world, interviewing selective and selected individuals and making tongue in cheek movies might not understand that their own demise is part of the plan as well.
Apr 19, 2008 - 8:30 am 5. narciso:The problem, among many, is that Spurlock didn’t spend enough time in the actual places were Bin Laden is likely to be; The Federated
Apr 19, 2008 - 7:40 pm 6. Misanthropicus:Territories of Pakistan, the adjoining Afghan
border areas; maybe even Western Iran. Now the
jihadies who stream into Iraq, Afghanistan, et al; do seem to come from Morocco, Libya, Algeria & Saudi Arabia; with operational figures coming from those three countries. The
stench of 9/11 denial/rationalization is strong enough to make one gag.
[...]The film closes with outtakes from personalities Spurlock encountered. Some simply gaze into the camera. One of the most anti-American Saudis slowly allows a smile to cross his face. He’s tentative at first, like it hurts him. He looks pained and then it’s like he’s aware of how silly he looks and he gives us a real smile. In that smile, we can see our common lot. Like when you’ve had an argument with someone, and you just want it to end and there’s a moment when you see you’re wrong or you don’t even care who’s right anymore and a smile crosses your face. His smile was like that.
Apr 20, 2008 - 10:38 am 7. chris:Spurlock is just one man (with a hard working band of producers) who took on trekking to these difficult places in the world, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Israel/Palestine, Egypt, and Morocco. He stops short of Pakistan. Recalling Wall Street Journal reporter Danny Pearl’s fate there (Pearl, a hard news reporter was on the trail of al Qaeda; his wife was also pregnant at the time) it was probably not an un-wise move, given that Spurlock was a novice in these matters. The film shows how regular people can ferret out simple truths, when our leaders fail to make the effort. [...]”
Don’t panic, this was the end of a tragicomic review(?) in HuffPost by one Logan Nakyanz Pollard (turns out that she’s a Air America producer, so…).
I won’t see this crap – a friend of me (liberal) did a stop to see it and walked out rapidly, per his report in the theater were only a gang of yakking kinds and a few somber, MoveOn.Org-like types. The movie is trying to be a Borat showing his soft, human side, complemented by the known liberal Bush obsessions. A humorless & contrived stinker. Who’s financing this type of crap? Cuban? Soros strikes again? Anyway, it took Spurlock 6 years to move from Supersize This to this thing – hope it’ll take much more ’till he’ll have another project on the screen.
Bad news: my teenager went to 9:40 showing in lefty Oakland (at least recognizes it is biased)
Apr 20, 2008 - 11:48 am 8. william:Good news: only 6 people at 9:30 showing on a Saturday night
Prediction: straight to DVD – no buzz, no legs, no audience for roll out to non socialist enclaves
I actually did see Supersize Me (on television). It was OK, but the premise was flawed. If he had exclusively eaten General Tso’s chicken or pork chow fun there would have been the same dire health consequences that he suffered by eating exclusively at McDonalds. But some neighborhood Chinese restaurant would not be so easy to typecast as a corporate demon. I used to think that in the liberal hierarchy of bad ideas religion takes precedence over capitalism. But not so. A religion like Islam with its profound anti-capitalism bias (Sharia law does not allow interest) is offered a tolerance not given to Christianity. If that LDS community in Texas would convert to Islam their troubles would be over tomorrow.
Apr 20, 2008 - 2:43 pm