<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Barack Needs Hillary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:23:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-77829</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-77829</guid>
		<description>Hillary is the only one that can guarantee a win in nov with barack.. they have chemisty,, she is tried and
true campaigner and can deflect the gop attack machine in her own way so it is the best thing for all .. also guarantees the almost 18 million that wanted hillary will be elctified and have more boots on the streetin nov to get out the vote...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is the only one that can guarantee a win in nov with barack.. they have chemisty,, she is tried and<br />
true campaigner and can deflect the gop attack machine in her own way so it is the best thing for all .. also guarantees the almost 18 million that wanted hillary will be elctified and have more boots on the streetin nov to get out the vote&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HillaryforPresident</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-71843</link>
		<dc:creator>HillaryforPresident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-71843</guid>
		<description>Radical Moderate:

During some Democrat gatherings, I was so irritated seating and standing with communist groups.   First, it was okey ... for the sake of the votes.

After the cheatings orchestrated by the communists... I BECAME AWARE OF HOW STUPID I AM MINGLING WITH THE COMMUNISTS.

There are already many of us who are NOW emboldened by our next MAIN AGENDA:  Remove all communists from Dem Party.   Let the communists form their own group and never cause harm to Dem party again. PERIOD.

For the mean time, VOTE FOR MCCAIN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radical Moderate:</p>
<p>During some Democrat gatherings, I was so irritated seating and standing with communist groups.   First, it was okey &#8230; for the sake of the votes.</p>
<p>After the cheatings orchestrated by the communists&#8230; I BECAME AWARE OF HOW STUPID I AM MINGLING WITH THE COMMUNISTS.</p>
<p>There are already many of us who are NOW emboldened by our next MAIN AGENDA:  Remove all communists from Dem Party.   Let the communists form their own group and never cause harm to Dem party again. PERIOD.</p>
<p>For the mean time, VOTE FOR MCCAIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HillaryforPresident</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-71837</link>
		<dc:creator>HillaryforPresident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-71837</guid>
		<description>Why do you think he has turned hard right? Not his idea. He has been handled by Axlerod since day one, and is extremely coachable. He knows his talents, and his shortcomings.


!!!!!!!!!!


EXACTLY.  HILLARY HAS STILL CHANCE IN 2012 IF OBAMA DOES NOT WIN 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think he has turned hard right? Not his idea. He has been handled by Axlerod since day one, and is extremely coachable. He knows his talents, and his shortcomings.</p>
<p>!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>EXACTLY.  HILLARY HAS STILL CHANCE IN 2012 IF OBAMA DOES NOT WIN 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HillaryforPresident</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-71836</link>
		<dc:creator>HillaryforPresident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 09:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-71836</guid>
		<description>Hillary has thrown her support behind Obama, and their positions are just not that different. 

!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why? Hillary&#039;s position is more similar to McCain.

The only similar thing between Obama and Clinton is the Party.  What differs between McCain and Clinton is the party.

In principles, they are more alike than compared to Obama, even in the issue of War, healthcare, etc.

What is obvious but never discussed is this: the Clintons support JFK - an anti-communist Dem President.

Your Obama is a communist.

Bill is right in saying that Hillary&#039;s loss is due to the far left including CODEPINK, CPUSA and Chicago DSA who are all aligning behind Obama.  Don&#039;t you know that even Howard Dean is a socialist himself, including Sanders of Vermont?

There are moderate Democrats who are against communits and hardline socialists working within the Dem Party.

And that&#039;s US... Clintons4McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary has thrown her support behind Obama, and their positions are just not that different. </p>
<p>!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Why? Hillary&#8217;s position is more similar to McCain.</p>
<p>The only similar thing between Obama and Clinton is the Party.  What differs between McCain and Clinton is the party.</p>
<p>In principles, they are more alike than compared to Obama, even in the issue of War, healthcare, etc.</p>
<p>What is obvious but never discussed is this: the Clintons support JFK &#8211; an anti-communist Dem President.</p>
<p>Your Obama is a communist.</p>
<p>Bill is right in saying that Hillary&#8217;s loss is due to the far left including CODEPINK, CPUSA and Chicago DSA who are all aligning behind Obama.  Don&#8217;t you know that even Howard Dean is a socialist himself, including Sanders of Vermont?</p>
<p>There are moderate Democrats who are against communits and hardline socialists working within the Dem Party.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s US&#8230; Clintons4McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimba</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-71717</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-71717</guid>
		<description>I am as stubborn a Hillary supporter as anyone, but a former Clinton supporter voting for anyone but Obama is nothing more than a slap in Hillary&#039;s face, and goes against everything she has fought for. I know your concerns, but trust the power Dems to keep this pup in line. Why do you think he has turned hard right? Not his idea. He has been handled by Axlerod since day one, and is extremely coachable. He knows his talents, and his shortcomings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am as stubborn a Hillary supporter as anyone, but a former Clinton supporter voting for anyone but Obama is nothing more than a slap in Hillary&#8217;s face, and goes against everything she has fought for. I know your concerns, but trust the power Dems to keep this pup in line. Why do you think he has turned hard right? Not his idea. He has been handled by Axlerod since day one, and is extremely coachable. He knows his talents, and his shortcomings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radical_moderate</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-70991</link>
		<dc:creator>radical_moderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-70991</guid>
		<description>&quot;I will vote for McCain for President this November. Period.&quot;
============
From Hillary supporter to voting for McCain? That is quite a leap considering that Mrs. Clinton&#039;s positions and Senator McCain&#039;s are diametrically opposed.

But tell me, what is it about McCain that you like? The fact that yet again, millions of Americans will have no access to affordable Health Care? Or that McCain might manage to overturn Roe (please don&#039;t tell me that a Democrat Senate will keep McCain&#039;s appointees in check, both Scalia and Thomas were voted in with Democrat majorities.)

Are you really supportive of permanent military bases in Iraq?

Hillary has thrown her support behind Obama, and their positions are just not that different. 

I understand that you&#039;re disappointed, but could you try to be less emotional and a wee bit more rational?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I will vote for McCain for President this November. Period.&#8221;<br />
============<br />
From Hillary supporter to voting for McCain? That is quite a leap considering that Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s positions and Senator McCain&#8217;s are diametrically opposed.</p>
<p>But tell me, what is it about McCain that you like? The fact that yet again, millions of Americans will have no access to affordable Health Care? Or that McCain might manage to overturn Roe (please don&#8217;t tell me that a Democrat Senate will keep McCain&#8217;s appointees in check, both Scalia and Thomas were voted in with Democrat majorities.)</p>
<p>Are you really supportive of permanent military bases in Iraq?</p>
<p>Hillary has thrown her support behind Obama, and their positions are just not that different. </p>
<p>I understand that you&#8217;re disappointed, but could you try to be less emotional and a wee bit more rational?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HillaryforPresident</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-70684</link>
		<dc:creator>HillaryforPresident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-70684</guid>
		<description>Obama is a liar and a cheater. That&#039;s my personal conviction.

To sally, Obama not tainted by Washington?  Why is he considering all Bush Generals now? No, Obama will better off if he is tainted by Washington!   Obama&#039;s worst qualification is being tainted by the Communists and Socialists.  His current strategy of pandering the conservatives is the exact gimmickry of the Communists who are Anti-War but with the add-on of weakening the entire military forces of America.   Obama is the Trojan Horse of the CPUSA.

I will vote for McCain for President this November. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is a liar and a cheater. That&#8217;s my personal conviction.</p>
<p>To sally, Obama not tainted by Washington?  Why is he considering all Bush Generals now? No, Obama will better off if he is tainted by Washington!   Obama&#8217;s worst qualification is being tainted by the Communists and Socialists.  His current strategy of pandering the conservatives is the exact gimmickry of the Communists who are Anti-War but with the add-on of weakening the entire military forces of America.   Obama is the Trojan Horse of the CPUSA.</p>
<p>I will vote for McCain for President this November. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-70224</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 04:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-70224</guid>
		<description>We absolutely know what we&#039;ve got with McCain, (Looking back on the last seven and a half years).  I&#039;ll take my chances with Senator Obama, someone who hasn&#039;t been thoroughly tainted by the Washington, something that can&#039;t be said about either Hillary or McCain.  No Hillary for VP., and No McCain for anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We absolutely know what we&#8217;ve got with McCain, (Looking back on the last seven and a half years).  I&#8217;ll take my chances with Senator Obama, someone who hasn&#8217;t been thoroughly tainted by the Washington, something that can&#8217;t be said about either Hillary or McCain.  No Hillary for VP., and No McCain for anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radical_moderate</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-70104</link>
		<dc:creator>radical_moderate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 21:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-70104</guid>
		<description>&quot;He is not drawing the large crowds anymore. His momentum is gone. His freshness is all but evaporated.&quot;
===========
I don&#039;t think that choosing to speak at smaller venues means that Obama isn&#039;t drawing Large Crowds anymore. But whatever you know?

The fact is that Mrs. Clinton on the ticket might tempt her most rabid followers to vote for the ticket (I have read many that say they still won&#039;t vote for Obama even if Hillary is on the ticket), but she remains a polarizing figure among the general electorate, and I honestly don&#039;t see her attracting Independent voters that he needs. 

Better that he pick someone on the other side of the War vote than Clinton. Iraq was his &quot;change&quot; issue, and although he may back down on the timetable for withdrawal, he is still running on his judgement in opposing the War.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He is not drawing the large crowds anymore. His momentum is gone. His freshness is all but evaporated.&#8221;<br />
===========<br />
I don&#8217;t think that choosing to speak at smaller venues means that Obama isn&#8217;t drawing Large Crowds anymore. But whatever you know?</p>
<p>The fact is that Mrs. Clinton on the ticket might tempt her most rabid followers to vote for the ticket (I have read many that say they still won&#8217;t vote for Obama even if Hillary is on the ticket), but she remains a polarizing figure among the general electorate, and I honestly don&#8217;t see her attracting Independent voters that he needs. </p>
<p>Better that he pick someone on the other side of the War vote than Clinton. Iraq was his &#8220;change&#8221; issue, and although he may back down on the timetable for withdrawal, he is still running on his judgement in opposing the War.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forest Gump</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/comment-page-1/#comment-70031</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest Gump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-barack-needs-hillary/#comment-70031</guid>
		<description>Taylor Marsh from a March 14, 2008 post:

&quot;[b]Playing Democratic voters as fools[b], Obama and his campaign believe his current stance and couched statement on Wright is sufficient. It is not. How can someone attend a church for 20 years, be as close to Wright as Obama is, which is beyond dispute, but not know what he’s said?
[b]Senator Obama obviously thinks Democratic voters are stupid. It’s insulting.[b] And you don’t have to turn towards McCain to be a turned off Democrat at the thought of Obama as the nominee. It’s another judgment moment that reminds everyone of Tony Rezko.&quot;

Stupid is as stupid does!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor Marsh from a March 14, 2008 post:</p>
<p>&#8220;[b]Playing Democratic voters as fools[b], Obama and his campaign believe his current stance and couched statement on Wright is sufficient. It is not. How can someone attend a church for 20 years, be as close to Wright as Obama is, which is beyond dispute, but not know what he’s said?<br />
[b]Senator Obama obviously thinks Democratic voters are stupid. It’s insulting.[b] And you don’t have to turn towards McCain to be a turned off Democrat at the thought of Obama as the nominee. It’s another judgment moment that reminds everyone of Tony Rezko.&#8221;</p>
<p>Stupid is as stupid does!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
