<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will China Take Over North Korea?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:36:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: whatintheworld</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-238136</link>
		<dc:creator>whatintheworld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-238136</guid>
		<description>Has anyone ever considered that maybe another reason that China may NOT want a UNIFIED KOREA because think about it... If SK did unite with NK, the economic gap would be pretty wide and a headache to deal with, but...
SK is at the peak of technological advances and economic wealth so NK would provide a valuable source of CHEAP LABOR...
And cheap labor would eventually in the long run benefit the economy of a united Korea and give other countries (like China) a run for their money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone ever considered that maybe another reason that China may NOT want a UNIFIED KOREA because think about it&#8230; If SK did unite with NK, the economic gap would be pretty wide and a headache to deal with, but&#8230;<br />
SK is at the peak of technological advances and economic wealth so NK would provide a valuable source of CHEAP LABOR&#8230;<br />
And cheap labor would eventually in the long run benefit the economy of a united Korea and give other countries (like China) a run for their money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaiulBaztepo</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-229305</link>
		<dc:creator>RaiulBaztepo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-229305</guid>
		<description>Hello!
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource! 
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I&#039;v just started to learn this language ;)
See you! 
Your, Raiul Baztepo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource!<br />
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I&#8217;v just started to learn this language <img src='http://pajamasmedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
See you!<br />
Your, Raiul Baztepo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liliput</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-107367</link>
		<dc:creator>Liliput</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-107367</guid>
		<description>It is not that China doesn&#039;t want a unified Korea, China just doesn&#039;t want a US military base near its border. Btw, I&#039;m amazed with the focus of so many Americans on this issue while at the same time their economy and bankings are collapsing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not that China doesn&#8217;t want a unified Korea, China just doesn&#8217;t want a US military base near its border. Btw, I&#8217;m amazed with the focus of so many Americans on this issue while at the same time their economy and bankings are collapsing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon G. Chang</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-106307</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon G. Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-106307</guid>
		<description>Herunar, no one knows what China&#039;s population really is, but the official count is not considered reliable.  Many children are not counted because to do so would expose violations of the harshly enforced one-child policy.  Maybe I&#039;m off by tens of millions, but my estimate is undoubtedly closer to the real count than the central government&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herunar, no one knows what China&#8217;s population really is, but the official count is not considered reliable.  Many children are not counted because to do so would expose violations of the harshly enforced one-child policy.  Maybe I&#8217;m off by tens of millions, but my estimate is undoubtedly closer to the real count than the central government&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cedarford</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-106019</link>
		<dc:creator>cedarford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-106019</guid>
		<description>Herunar appears to be some pathetic 3rd world creature reading from some 40-year old Franz Fanon essay.

&lt;i&gt; USA tolerated and continues to tolerate and even support rogue regimes or monarchies from South Africa to Sudan to Saudi Arabia to Suharto Indonesia...&lt;/i&gt;

A clue, Sherlock, S Africa is no longer a &quot;rogue country&quot;, it is just becoming another black-run country transforming into an unsafe, corrupt shithole. The US does not support the Sudan regime. Muslims and Chinese do. We &quot;tolerate&quot; KSA, because the alternative the people want is extremist Islam. And where the fuck have you been, brainless one - on Indonesia. Suharto is long-gone and a US-supported fledgling democracy is in place.

As for your tears about the Iran coup over half a century ago, which Lefties and foolish morons from nations that are crap piles, and deserve to be - Mossadegh was elected. He also was wooing the Communists - in a year when the Russian and Chicom war to take over all Korea was raging, Communist revolutions were in progress in SE Asia, attempts in Greece. And trying to take British assets w/o compensation.

He was warned we would not tolerate him bringing the Soviets in again, and any nationalization must compensate the Brits for investments. He ignored that, and so was deposed.

To the Left and the terrorists that run Iran, Mossadegh is a hero, and they love their lurid conspiracies. Even though the Mullahs would have imprisoned or executed a man with Mossadeghs many un-Islamic flaws had he been contemporary with the Islamists.

Your stats appear to be pulled out of your ass. We use 20% of the oil production, make a third of our supply ourselves, and could make 70% if not for environmentalists blocking drilling, coal liquification, oil shale use. Not 60% of the oil. 
And China is the largest carbon user. Likely has been for 15 years if you include the CO2 released from thousands of coal mine fores the Chinese consider too much a waste of money to put out. So 60s is your America-hating based on &quot;evil energy users&quot; and your dumbass smear of Americans ....being fat (a stat only true of white Southerners, Mexican-Americans, and especially obese, black women and children)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herunar appears to be some pathetic 3rd world creature reading from some 40-year old Franz Fanon essay.</p>
<p><i> USA tolerated and continues to tolerate and even support rogue regimes or monarchies from South Africa to Sudan to Saudi Arabia to Suharto Indonesia&#8230;</i></p>
<p>A clue, Sherlock, S Africa is no longer a &#8220;rogue country&#8221;, it is just becoming another black-run country transforming into an unsafe, corrupt shithole. The US does not support the Sudan regime. Muslims and Chinese do. We &#8220;tolerate&#8221; KSA, because the alternative the people want is extremist Islam. And where the fuck have you been, brainless one &#8211; on Indonesia. Suharto is long-gone and a US-supported fledgling democracy is in place.</p>
<p>As for your tears about the Iran coup over half a century ago, which Lefties and foolish morons from nations that are crap piles, and deserve to be &#8211; Mossadegh was elected. He also was wooing the Communists &#8211; in a year when the Russian and Chicom war to take over all Korea was raging, Communist revolutions were in progress in SE Asia, attempts in Greece. And trying to take British assets w/o compensation.</p>
<p>He was warned we would not tolerate him bringing the Soviets in again, and any nationalization must compensate the Brits for investments. He ignored that, and so was deposed.</p>
<p>To the Left and the terrorists that run Iran, Mossadegh is a hero, and they love their lurid conspiracies. Even though the Mullahs would have imprisoned or executed a man with Mossadeghs many un-Islamic flaws had he been contemporary with the Islamists.</p>
<p>Your stats appear to be pulled out of your ass. We use 20% of the oil production, make a third of our supply ourselves, and could make 70% if not for environmentalists blocking drilling, coal liquification, oil shale use. Not 60% of the oil.<br />
And China is the largest carbon user. Likely has been for 15 years if you include the CO2 released from thousands of coal mine fores the Chinese consider too much a waste of money to put out. So 60s is your America-hating based on &#8220;evil energy users&#8221; and your dumbass smear of Americans &#8230;.being fat (a stat only true of white Southerners, Mexican-Americans, and especially obese, black women and children)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ex-fetus</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-105988</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-fetus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-105988</guid>
		<description>&quot;Long term they would probably tolerate a unified Korea in exchange for vastly fewer US troops on the peninsula.&quot;

Sounds like a win-win to me.  We can then send those troops someplace useful.  Say, Afghanistan or where Herunar lives.

&quot;Once you get them running, you stay right on top of them, and that way a small force can defeat a large one every time... Only thus can a weaker country cope with a stronger; it must make up in activity what it lacks in
strength.&quot;
   - General Thomas &quot;Stonewall&quot; Jackson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Long term they would probably tolerate a unified Korea in exchange for vastly fewer US troops on the peninsula.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sounds like a win-win to me.  We can then send those troops someplace useful.  Say, Afghanistan or where Herunar lives.</p>
<p>&#8220;Once you get them running, you stay right on top of them, and that way a small force can defeat a large one every time&#8230; Only thus can a weaker country cope with a stronger; it must make up in activity what it lacks in<br />
strength.&#8221;<br />
   &#8211; General Thomas &#8220;Stonewall&#8221; Jackson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herunar</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-105959</link>
		<dc:creator>Herunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-105959</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is no secret that China consumes more raw materials than any other country on the planet… more copper, more grain, etc.&quot;
It is no secret that the U.S., with a population 4% of the world, consumes over 60% of its oil. China? 12%. Is that why the United States overthrew a democratically elected leader in Iran, supported military coups of over 12 countries in South America, invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, and tolerated and continues to tolerate and even support rogue regimes or monarchies from South Africa to Sudan to Saudi Arabia to Suharto Indonesia? All for a few barrels of oil to fill up the fat cars of its obese, woefully ignorant citizens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is no secret that China consumes more raw materials than any other country on the planet… more copper, more grain, etc.&#8221;<br />
It is no secret that the U.S., with a population 4% of the world, consumes over 60% of its oil. China? 12%. Is that why the United States overthrew a democratically elected leader in Iran, supported military coups of over 12 countries in South America, invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, and tolerated and continues to tolerate and even support rogue regimes or monarchies from South Africa to Sudan to Saudi Arabia to Suharto Indonesia? All for a few barrels of oil to fill up the fat cars of its obese, woefully ignorant citizens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herunar</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-105955</link>
		<dc:creator>Herunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-105955</guid>
		<description>&quot;Absorb North Korea.&quot; What cynic bullshit is this? I can&#039;t imagine an uneducated moron like you giving a speech in the American Committees on Foreign Relations. No, seriously, this article is meant to be satire, right? And 1.5 billion people? Your figure is off by 200 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Absorb North Korea.&#8221; What cynic bullshit is this? I can&#8217;t imagine an uneducated moron like you giving a speech in the American Committees on Foreign Relations. No, seriously, this article is meant to be satire, right? And 1.5 billion people? Your figure is off by 200 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corky Boyd</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-105931</link>
		<dc:creator>Corky Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-105931</guid>
		<description>It won&#039;t be a takeover by China, all China wants is a stable buffer between it and pro-western S. Korea.  A friendly military pro-communist governmernt is what they will install.

There&#039;s not alot we can do to stop it and short term it would solve some problems for us.  Both we and the Chinese want the DPRK nuclear program halted.  Not because it threatens them, but it is a major thorn in the side of Japan.  Above all China doesn&#039;t want a nuclear Japan and they are on the verge of going there if the DPRK restarts their weapons program.

Long term they would probably tolerate a unified Korea in exchange for vastly fewer US troops on the peninsula.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t be a takeover by China, all China wants is a stable buffer between it and pro-western S. Korea.  A friendly military pro-communist governmernt is what they will install.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s not alot we can do to stop it and short term it would solve some problems for us.  Both we and the Chinese want the DPRK nuclear program halted.  Not because it threatens them, but it is a major thorn in the side of Japan.  Above all China doesn&#8217;t want a nuclear Japan and they are on the verge of going there if the DPRK restarts their weapons program.</p>
<p>Long term they would probably tolerate a unified Korea in exchange for vastly fewer US troops on the peninsula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Dudley</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-105849</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Dudley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-china-take-over-north-korea/#comment-105849</guid>
		<description>i/Who in their right mind WANTS North Korea?/

Actually, it&#039;s irrelevant who wants NK.  The point is that someone will go in there if there&#039;s a power vaccum. In that situation there&#039;s only two logical parties: China and South Korea.  

China&#039;s reasons are mainly strategic, and less to do with the minerals and more about further securing it&#039;s Northeastern flank from Japan (and by extension the US). 

South Korea&#039;s reasons are mostly emotional - reunification has been touted as a political solution for many of what South Korea&#039;s people think ills them.  Even those on the left-of-center would consider reunification vital if South Korea is to rid itself of the US.  If a situation occured where it looked like Reunification was possible, yet outside parties (such as China or the US) tried to prevent it, it would spark a political firestorm in SK, enough to push them to war.

As I mentioned earlier, the ROK should make Kim a Deal He Can&#039;t Refuse.  However, given the absoultely enormous dependency NK already has with China, it&#039;s very unlikely China hasn&#039;t already set up the pieces for their own takeover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i/Who in their right mind WANTS North Korea?/</p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s irrelevant who wants NK.  The point is that someone will go in there if there&#8217;s a power vaccum. In that situation there&#8217;s only two logical parties: China and South Korea.  </p>
<p>China&#8217;s reasons are mainly strategic, and less to do with the minerals and more about further securing it&#8217;s Northeastern flank from Japan (and by extension the US). </p>
<p>South Korea&#8217;s reasons are mostly emotional &#8211; reunification has been touted as a political solution for many of what South Korea&#8217;s people think ills them.  Even those on the left-of-center would consider reunification vital if South Korea is to rid itself of the US.  If a situation occured where it looked like Reunification was possible, yet outside parties (such as China or the US) tried to prevent it, it would spark a political firestorm in SK, enough to push them to war.</p>
<p>As I mentioned earlier, the ROK should make Kim a Deal He Can&#8217;t Refuse.  However, given the absoultely enormous dependency NK already has with China, it&#8217;s very unlikely China hasn&#8217;t already set up the pieces for their own takeover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
