We must face: Why Barack Obama can lose on “Election Moment”. And what we must do so he Wins.

America can be seen as a nation of instant gratification, shock value and wishful thinking. Through these valid perceptions our ability to succeed against great odds is proven often. Our will to have good triumph over evil is undeniable. And most of all; our fortunate gifts living in this land prevail against our own internal enemy’s of thought.

This coming Presidential Election Day will require us all to do great battle with the enemy’s of thought, the high-jackers of thinking, the masters of influencing spontaneity.

HOW DEEP WILL YOU GO.

Barack Obama will lose if we don’t drudge out every ounce of racism alive and well in America. Our nations public voice and face has behaved at the highest levels of proper presentation; pretending that racism is dead or at least almost gone. But our private thoughts, deep in the gullies of ones own mind, lives the uncertainty of our personal truth. On “Election moment”, as we choose will America vote for a person who is not a white male? *There is nothing wrong with voting for a white male, that is not the point of this commentary.

HOW OBAMA MAY LOSE.

I can assert many voting Americans will walk to the voting booth on Election Day and gravel with their choice for a president based on color. And I can confirm, many voting Americans will inequitably vote for anyone but a black, mulatto or ethnic president. This “Election Moment” must be influenced by a character choice, nothing else.

THE SOLUTION.

On our campaign road to an Obama White house, we must remember to keep it simple. This Election Moment is not about Democrat or Republican, man or woman, even the color of a persons skin. This Election Moment is about Character.

THE CHARACTER FACTOR

A persons character, their thought process, their ability to lead, to change course, to admit their errors, to put in corrections, to adjust their course, to learn, grow, to be wrong, to have faith beyond one’s own faith and many more of these attributes is what we need as Americas next generation of leaders.

ONE QUESTION WILL REVEAL THE CHARACTER FACTOR

Will you abolish the failed forty seven (47) year old U.S. Embargo on Cuba? It’s a yes or no question.

Any politician or person that still has to think about saying yes. Or is determined to maintain, tighten and enforce a U.S. Policy that has not worked for forty seven years clearly does not have The Character Factor.

YES IS THE ONLY ANSWER

Yes to abolishing the five decade old failed policy against Cuba is the only answer that will demonstrate a person’s character.

WHAT YOU CAN DO.

“Will you abolish the failed forty seven (47) year old U.S. Embargo on Cuba?”

I ask that you include and ask this question to every politician you meet. Ask it on every blog you participate in. Make this election about the character factor of the person running for office.

JOHN McCAINS CHARACTER FACTOR

Ask McCain every chance you can. Why is he committed to continuing the embargo on Cuba that has not worked for forty seven years?

What does it say about McCain that he will not consider anything but enforcing a U.S. Policy that has not worked for almost five decades.

OBAMA HAS THE CHARACTER FACTOR

Obama is committed to new relationships with Cuba.

VOTE FOR CHARACTER

Lets make sure we bring to the forefront the number one issue an American should think of when they reach their personal Election Moment vote.

Am I voting for a person who has Character? In that one Election Moment, when an American goes to vote, we must trust that their Character factor will prevail above all else.

Your time is appreciated, and your response is welcomed.

With much respect,

Luis Moro

Filmmaker +

See 1400 free photos of Cuba. At: http://www.EveryThingCuba.com

ADD ME AS YOUR BARACK OBAMA FRIEND

Review diverse perspectives on Barack Obama and Cuban policy at: http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/Cuba

Support Independence, buy our Award Winning Indie films. http://www.MoroFilms.com

Thank you for supporting independent films. Luis and Bobbi Moro

It’s not necessarily “who” you people pick, it’s how that person is chosen. Latin America has a long standing tradition of voter fraud and manipulation and outright one-party non-elections. You (and others) may not like President Bush, and I certainly won’t enjoy an Obama presidency, but at least our elections are fair and true with corruption and fraud being minimal and localized events. The same cannot be said for most of Latin America.

Then there is that pesky problem of Latin American governmental leaders emptying the coffers of their nations and fleeing……

Mary and Redman, when i said that about GB, i was acknowledgeing that Henry was right. He’sright also about Carter being softer with Latin America than his predecessors (Altough he was far from being and angel). When Carter started to talk about human rights in Latin America, the relations between the uruguayan dictatorship and the US government became strained. A little.

So, if someone wants to recapitulate what i’ve been reading in the next comment, he could just say that the US has behaved very well towards Latin America, and if some issues exists, is because we’re infantile voters. I definitely agree with this last one, but there’s no need to receive lessons by people governed by Dubya (And in some months by Obama. That´s gonna be really really funny).

I read a blog by a fellow named “ferfal” (if you Google his name you’ll find his writings, they are quite interesting) in which he has been cataloguing the economic troubles Argentina has been suffering for nearly a decade. He’s not entirely convinced that they are a democracy, especially since both the FPV and the Justicialists still cling to Peronism.

Every election cycle the losing party’s voters demonstrate charging election fraud, which quite frequently descends into rioting. It could just be partisan bickering for all I know, I don’t claim to be an expert.

“the relation of the military dictatorship with the US changed it’s
course after years of carnal relations”

This one made me laugh. I didn’t know governments could have carnal relations. Who’s on top?

“And BTW, could you explain me why Latin America has been filled with Yankee soldiers for so long? Are they on vacation? If so, do they need to carry their weapons?”

Where exactly in Latin America are American soldiers marching through avenues with rifles? Certainly not in Montevideo. More making shit up.

Redman:

where do you get that Argentina “more or less continues to be” a military dictatorship. It was a military dictatorship until the Falklands and that fiasco brought them down. The military in Argentina has been seriously defanged. They don’t have remotely the influence they had in the 60s, 70s and 80s. There’s no conscription anymore.

Not only is the UK not a dictatorship, Argentina was (and more or less continues to be).

“while american marines butchered people in El Salvador”

Now you’re just making shit up.

The US supported GB in the Falkland Islands and that was instrumental in Argentina losing the war.

The last time I checked, Great Britain a.k.a. the United Kingdom was not a military dictatorship.