<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would Hillary Have Won Iowa Without Edwards?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:36:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-91925</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 19:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-91925</guid>
		<description>You can see both &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVU4oImQo3g&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the conspiracy and crib sheet issues raised here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can see both <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVU4oImQo3g" rel="nofollow">the conspiracy and crib sheet issues raised here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trochilus</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-91922</link>
		<dc:creator>Trochilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-91922</guid>
		<description>And, of course, without Edwards in the mix, who would Hillary have eventually conspired with to limit the field of Democrat candidates?



Heck, without all those people running around, Obama might have been called out earlier for having his &quot;crib sheet&quot; with him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, of course, without Edwards in the mix, who would Hillary have eventually conspired with to limit the field of Democrat candidates?</p>
<p>Heck, without all those people running around, Obama might have been called out earlier for having his &#8220;crib sheet&#8221; with him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cedarford</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-91022</link>
		<dc:creator>cedarford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-91022</guid>
		<description>Good on Jerilyn Merritt, who one of many refreshing open-minded liberals out there (she does good writing at Talk Left). 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;SpaceCat:
 
This is a ridiculous game of speculation. Essentially what this article argues is there’s no way of knowing what would have happened.&lt;/i&gt;

No, it is about the MSM failing to do what the Constitution envisioned when it gave the press protected status to help ensure informed voters and informed debate as voters were given important facts and arguments. And the MSM failed to do this in a way that left voters in both Parties as ill-informed about the candidates as voters in a state-controlled press tend to be.
 
There were three main agendas that had settled in the MSM that repeatedly arose as their bias in the 2008 campaign:

1. The War in Iraq was lost and losing 3-8 &quot;heroes&quot; a week made the war the most unbearable conflict in American history. 

2. Steadfast media refusal to vet Obama, John McCain while attempting to mire any other candidate in any inconsistancies over long careers as &quot;flip-floppers&quot; something that was a MSM (and blogger) parlor game of stupid &quot;gotcha&quot;.
This got so bad, the MSM so deep in bed with &quot;The Magic Black Hope&quot; that eventually they were partially embarassed out of it by SNL and other comedy shows. 
But they still didn&#039;t vet Obama on Wright, Ayers, his radical voting record, or his and his wife&#039;s unusual patronage jobs at U of Chicago. Not was Edwards vetted. Or Hillary&#039;s &quot;First Lady is really an executive leader by proxy&quot; claims. Or their favorite Republican, McCain, who got a pass. 

3. The usual MSM &quot;horse race&quot; and &quot;gotcha!&quot; and focus in minor flubs bias - led by the late, unlamented (to me, in the sense that I think political journalism is better off without him) main purveyor of it - Tim Russert.
Followed by the MSM settling on their preferred narratives for their preferred two candidates. Rock Star, race-healer, supremely intelligent and wise orator to the masses Obama. And plucky old war hero McCain, hated by the ignorant people who cling to their God, religion and guns who oppose Open Borders out of racism..All while going after looking into Romney, Huckabee, Biden, Thompson, and Dodds backgrounds with vigor.

It is hard to prove any speculation, but it is not hard to prove the media singularly failed to uncover basic facts on major candidates.

1. Obama&#039;s 20-year association and mentoring by a black bigot.
2. Edwards affair, misuse of campaign funds, pattern of lies.
3. The Obama raised in poverty to a poor, single mother meme.
4. The brilliant head of Harvard Law Review and Senior Law Professor meme - Which ignored that Obama has never written a single law article or stood in court as lead on a single case. Both rather extraordinary things - given no other editor of a major Law School Review has ever been selected without publishing, and no Senior Lecturer in Law at any prestigious school has failed to be a distinguished Judge, a major published top law firm partner, a visiting Professor with extensive scholarship, or top former Government official who dealt with a specialized legal field (like patents, labor, maritime law, military) or administered as a top executive leader or Legislative leader. Nor was his wife the &quot;brilliant lawyer&quot; the MSM gushed over until he locked up the nomination. She failed her Bar exam, possibly twice, and dropped her law license after some bad years at Sidley, back in 1993 - and her high salary jobs appear to be greased by some of Obama&#039;s billionaire backers who control the U of Chicago Board of Trustees - The Crown, Pritzker, Klutznik Families and their &quot;retainers&quot; brought along by their wealth and power pre-Obama, like Valerie Jarrett ( a joint Crown-Pritzker-Chicago Black Elite Project).
The qualifications of both seem to go to affirmative action - like discovery that Whaneema Naimo, head of the African Studies Department at prestigious Duke - managed to get her PhD, tenure, and Head of Department status without completing her promised PhD publication, without publishing any significant scholarly work before getting tenure or her own Department.
5. The repeated pounding in of Obama&#039;s &quot;legendary&quot; speech of &quot;stellar good judgment&quot; against Iraq in 2002 that Hillary was mysteriously unable to effectively fight - despite Obama was just one of many making similar speeches of such &quot;stellar good judgment&quot; in ground as politically safe as hugely liberal Hyde Park - Castro, Yassir Arafat, Vlad Putin, Jacques de Villepin, Susan Sarandon all said the same things Obama said back in 2002.
Obama&#039;s &quot;courage&quot; in opposing the War from a Hyde Park podium addressing 60 old SDS or other old counterculture peaceniks with the assent of his leftist Billionaire Families backers - was akin to touting Bush&#039;s &quot;courage&quot; and &quot;legendary good judgment&quot; in preaching family values at various Megachurches while running for Governor in Texas.

6. Every effort was made by the MSM to gloss over what made McCain so hated by so many mainstream conservatives to focus on his Vietnam time 35-40 years ago.

Yes, at this time it is speculation. 

Would the Wright tapes, and Obama&#039;s association with radicals the MSM ignored as &quot;outside the narrative we have to push&quot; have sunk Obama pre-Iowa when he was billed as &quot;moderate &amp; racially transcendent&quot;? Maybe.
Would the Edwards adultery scandal if fully disclosed by the MSM sitting on it since Oct 2006 have also have spilled over to Republicans determining they too wanted a &quot;clean candidate&quot; and knocked out McCain, back when he was down for the count on his Amnesty proposal, as well as Rudy? Maybe. Even maybe likely. Maybe even likelier that the Republicans would have shed McCain and Rudy if Edwards fell on infidelity early on, than the likelihood Hillary would have beaten Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on Jerilyn Merritt, who one of many refreshing open-minded liberals out there (she does good writing at Talk Left). </p>
<p><i>&#8220;SpaceCat:</p>
<p>This is a ridiculous game of speculation. Essentially what this article argues is there’s no way of knowing what would have happened.</i></p>
<p>No, it is about the MSM failing to do what the Constitution envisioned when it gave the press protected status to help ensure informed voters and informed debate as voters were given important facts and arguments. And the MSM failed to do this in a way that left voters in both Parties as ill-informed about the candidates as voters in a state-controlled press tend to be.</p>
<p>There were three main agendas that had settled in the MSM that repeatedly arose as their bias in the 2008 campaign:</p>
<p>1. The War in Iraq was lost and losing 3-8 &#8220;heroes&#8221; a week made the war the most unbearable conflict in American history. </p>
<p>2. Steadfast media refusal to vet Obama, John McCain while attempting to mire any other candidate in any inconsistancies over long careers as &#8220;flip-floppers&#8221; something that was a MSM (and blogger) parlor game of stupid &#8220;gotcha&#8221;.<br />
This got so bad, the MSM so deep in bed with &#8220;The Magic Black Hope&#8221; that eventually they were partially embarassed out of it by SNL and other comedy shows.<br />
But they still didn&#8217;t vet Obama on Wright, Ayers, his radical voting record, or his and his wife&#8217;s unusual patronage jobs at U of Chicago. Not was Edwards vetted. Or Hillary&#8217;s &#8220;First Lady is really an executive leader by proxy&#8221; claims. Or their favorite Republican, McCain, who got a pass. </p>
<p>3. The usual MSM &#8220;horse race&#8221; and &#8220;gotcha!&#8221; and focus in minor flubs bias &#8211; led by the late, unlamented (to me, in the sense that I think political journalism is better off without him) main purveyor of it &#8211; Tim Russert.<br />
Followed by the MSM settling on their preferred narratives for their preferred two candidates. Rock Star, race-healer, supremely intelligent and wise orator to the masses Obama. And plucky old war hero McCain, hated by the ignorant people who cling to their God, religion and guns who oppose Open Borders out of racism..All while going after looking into Romney, Huckabee, Biden, Thompson, and Dodds backgrounds with vigor.</p>
<p>It is hard to prove any speculation, but it is not hard to prove the media singularly failed to uncover basic facts on major candidates.</p>
<p>1. Obama&#8217;s 20-year association and mentoring by a black bigot.<br />
2. Edwards affair, misuse of campaign funds, pattern of lies.<br />
3. The Obama raised in poverty to a poor, single mother meme.<br />
4. The brilliant head of Harvard Law Review and Senior Law Professor meme &#8211; Which ignored that Obama has never written a single law article or stood in court as lead on a single case. Both rather extraordinary things &#8211; given no other editor of a major Law School Review has ever been selected without publishing, and no Senior Lecturer in Law at any prestigious school has failed to be a distinguished Judge, a major published top law firm partner, a visiting Professor with extensive scholarship, or top former Government official who dealt with a specialized legal field (like patents, labor, maritime law, military) or administered as a top executive leader or Legislative leader. Nor was his wife the &#8220;brilliant lawyer&#8221; the MSM gushed over until he locked up the nomination. She failed her Bar exam, possibly twice, and dropped her law license after some bad years at Sidley, back in 1993 &#8211; and her high salary jobs appear to be greased by some of Obama&#8217;s billionaire backers who control the U of Chicago Board of Trustees &#8211; The Crown, Pritzker, Klutznik Families and their &#8220;retainers&#8221; brought along by their wealth and power pre-Obama, like Valerie Jarrett ( a joint Crown-Pritzker-Chicago Black Elite Project).<br />
The qualifications of both seem to go to affirmative action &#8211; like discovery that Whaneema Naimo, head of the African Studies Department at prestigious Duke &#8211; managed to get her PhD, tenure, and Head of Department status without completing her promised PhD publication, without publishing any significant scholarly work before getting tenure or her own Department.<br />
5. The repeated pounding in of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;legendary&#8221; speech of &#8220;stellar good judgment&#8221; against Iraq in 2002 that Hillary was mysteriously unable to effectively fight &#8211; despite Obama was just one of many making similar speeches of such &#8220;stellar good judgment&#8221; in ground as politically safe as hugely liberal Hyde Park &#8211; Castro, Yassir Arafat, Vlad Putin, Jacques de Villepin, Susan Sarandon all said the same things Obama said back in 2002.<br />
Obama&#8217;s &#8220;courage&#8221; in opposing the War from a Hyde Park podium addressing 60 old SDS or other old counterculture peaceniks with the assent of his leftist Billionaire Families backers &#8211; was akin to touting Bush&#8217;s &#8220;courage&#8221; and &#8220;legendary good judgment&#8221; in preaching family values at various Megachurches while running for Governor in Texas.</p>
<p>6. Every effort was made by the MSM to gloss over what made McCain so hated by so many mainstream conservatives to focus on his Vietnam time 35-40 years ago.</p>
<p>Yes, at this time it is speculation. </p>
<p>Would the Wright tapes, and Obama&#8217;s association with radicals the MSM ignored as &#8220;outside the narrative we have to push&#8221; have sunk Obama pre-Iowa when he was billed as &#8220;moderate &amp; racially transcendent&#8221;? Maybe.<br />
Would the Edwards adultery scandal if fully disclosed by the MSM sitting on it since Oct 2006 have also have spilled over to Republicans determining they too wanted a &#8220;clean candidate&#8221; and knocked out McCain, back when he was down for the count on his Amnesty proposal, as well as Rudy? Maybe. Even maybe likely. Maybe even likelier that the Republicans would have shed McCain and Rudy if Edwards fell on infidelity early on, than the likelihood Hillary would have beaten Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talk Left? &#171; Media Needle</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-90996</link>
		<dc:creator>Talk Left? &#171; Media Needle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-90996</guid>
		<description>[...] Talk&#160;Left?  Then why the fuck is  Jeralyn Merritt  posting at Pajamas Media? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Talk&nbsp;Left?  Then why the fuck is  Jeralyn Merritt  posting at Pajamas Media? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Shay</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-90954</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Shay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-90954</guid>
		<description>Andrew Young of the John Edwards story:    The arrests for worthless checks, DWI, burglary, criminal mischief, the federal tax lien
 
webofdeception.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Young of the John Edwards story:    The arrests for worthless checks, DWI, burglary, criminal mischief, the federal tax lien</p>
<p>webofdeception.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Clinton</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-90922</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-90922</guid>
		<description>I have always supported Sen. Obama.  I always told Hillary and Chelsea to support Sen. Obama.  I have never said anything even slightly negative about Sen. Obama.  I have always suspected Sen. Edwards of being a sleaze.  I told Hillary to steer clear of him, lest he attempt to do anything inappropriate.  That&#039;s why he stood as far away from him at the debates.  He was always eyeing her, that dog.  I will fight to the death for Sen. Obama, because I have always believed that he can be the best president that this counrty has ever seen since JFK, who I met once and had a great personal friendship with in 1964 and 1965, when we went sailing off his family compound in Missouri.  I have alswyas loved Missouri, great &quot;clams casino.&quot;  Well, enough about McCain.  Have you donated to the greatest institution in all of mankind, the Clinton Library and Massage Parlour?  Well, got to go, my personal assistant, Tiffany, is seting up a global initiative for me tonight and I got major important world peace stuff to take care of.  Bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always supported Sen. Obama.  I always told Hillary and Chelsea to support Sen. Obama.  I have never said anything even slightly negative about Sen. Obama.  I have always suspected Sen. Edwards of being a sleaze.  I told Hillary to steer clear of him, lest he attempt to do anything inappropriate.  That&#8217;s why he stood as far away from him at the debates.  He was always eyeing her, that dog.  I will fight to the death for Sen. Obama, because I have always believed that he can be the best president that this counrty has ever seen since JFK, who I met once and had a great personal friendship with in 1964 and 1965, when we went sailing off his family compound in Missouri.  I have alswyas loved Missouri, great &#8220;clams casino.&#8221;  Well, enough about McCain.  Have you donated to the greatest institution in all of mankind, the Clinton Library and Massage Parlour?  Well, got to go, my personal assistant, Tiffany, is seting up a global initiative for me tonight and I got major important world peace stuff to take care of.  Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volkmeister</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-90914</link>
		<dc:creator>Volkmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-90914</guid>
		<description>Libworld:  Hillary and Bill are the greatest, smartest and cleverest politicians in history.  Hillary will take the convention and dominate so much that the weakened Messiah will concede that she should be the nominee.  She will step forward and accept the nomination.  Four more years of Bill and Hil.  Entertainment at its level best.  Maybe this time we can completely dismantle the CIA, erect higher and stronger walls between FBI and intelligence, and appoint three more ACLU lawyer to the US Supreme Court.  Noam Chomsky and Sol Alinsky for Ministers of Culture and Defense, respectively.  Barbra Streisand for Minister of Culture and Jane Fonda for Minister of Patriotism Enforcement.  I can&#039;t wait, a socialist heaven-on-earth.  Oh, I forgot, there is no heaven - that would be somewhat religious (remember, church and state).  Perhaps when Hillary visits Fidel in Havana when she selects him as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, she can ask him to place John Edwards and Al Gore in appropriate positions as Minister of Carnal Relations and Emperor of Hot Gas and Emissions, respectively.  I find it amusing that democrats are always debating about who their candidates really are (as seen in the comments above).  Folks, THEY don&#039;t know who they really are.  Take The One True Obama, for example.  He says anything and everything that pops into his head depending upon who he&#039;s addressing that day.  What a guy!  That&#039;s what we need: a man who is everything to everyone.  An &quot;outsider&quot; and an all-knowing expert in everything.  Pure and experienced.  Smart (like all Democrat politicians), yet willing to learn about stuff as mundane as nuclear proliferation and containment of rogue states - like the U.S. under George Bush.  He can grovel with the best of them to the U.N.  He&#039;s John Kerry is a rockstar package.  He&#039;s hip and smart (oh, I already said &quot;smart&quot;).  He&#039;s the choice of Hamas, Fidel, Hugo and assorted Hollywood patriot movie stars.  Hillary&#039;s old news.  Bill&#039;s old news.  We&#039;re over them five minutes ago.  We&#039;re going for the whole enchilada: a total socialistic nirvana.  The game&#039;s afoot and Obama is leading the charge of &quot;yes we can.&quot;  What the hell, give it up and submit to The One.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libworld:  Hillary and Bill are the greatest, smartest and cleverest politicians in history.  Hillary will take the convention and dominate so much that the weakened Messiah will concede that she should be the nominee.  She will step forward and accept the nomination.  Four more years of Bill and Hil.  Entertainment at its level best.  Maybe this time we can completely dismantle the CIA, erect higher and stronger walls between FBI and intelligence, and appoint three more ACLU lawyer to the US Supreme Court.  Noam Chomsky and Sol Alinsky for Ministers of Culture and Defense, respectively.  Barbra Streisand for Minister of Culture and Jane Fonda for Minister of Patriotism Enforcement.  I can&#8217;t wait, a socialist heaven-on-earth.  Oh, I forgot, there is no heaven &#8211; that would be somewhat religious (remember, church and state).  Perhaps when Hillary visits Fidel in Havana when she selects him as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, she can ask him to place John Edwards and Al Gore in appropriate positions as Minister of Carnal Relations and Emperor of Hot Gas and Emissions, respectively.  I find it amusing that democrats are always debating about who their candidates really are (as seen in the comments above).  Folks, THEY don&#8217;t know who they really are.  Take The One True Obama, for example.  He says anything and everything that pops into his head depending upon who he&#8217;s addressing that day.  What a guy!  That&#8217;s what we need: a man who is everything to everyone.  An &#8220;outsider&#8221; and an all-knowing expert in everything.  Pure and experienced.  Smart (like all Democrat politicians), yet willing to learn about stuff as mundane as nuclear proliferation and containment of rogue states &#8211; like the U.S. under George Bush.  He can grovel with the best of them to the U.N.  He&#8217;s John Kerry is a rockstar package.  He&#8217;s hip and smart (oh, I already said &#8220;smart&#8221;).  He&#8217;s the choice of Hamas, Fidel, Hugo and assorted Hollywood patriot movie stars.  Hillary&#8217;s old news.  Bill&#8217;s old news.  We&#8217;re over them five minutes ago.  We&#8217;re going for the whole enchilada: a total socialistic nirvana.  The game&#8217;s afoot and Obama is leading the charge of &#8220;yes we can.&#8221;  What the hell, give it up and submit to The One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceCat</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-90909</link>
		<dc:creator>SpaceCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-90909</guid>
		<description>This is a ridiculous game of speculation. Essentially what this article argues is there&#039;s no way of knowing what would have happened. What if aliens landed? Who&#039;d have won in that particular &quot;scenario&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a ridiculous game of speculation. Essentially what this article argues is there&#8217;s no way of knowing what would have happened. What if aliens landed? Who&#8217;d have won in that particular &#8220;scenario&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKing</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-90903</link>
		<dc:creator>DKing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-90903</guid>
		<description>Wolfson&#039;s goal was to keep Clinton in the news and to that end he has succeded.  I don&#039;t think even he believes Edwards actions would have changed anything. The drama queen and her worker drones will keep it coming.  Witness the &quot;leak&quot; of her campaign emails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wolfson&#8217;s goal was to keep Clinton in the news and to that end he has succeded.  I don&#8217;t think even he believes Edwards actions would have changed anything. The drama queen and her worker drones will keep it coming.  Witness the &#8220;leak&#8221; of her campaign emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martyg</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/comment-page-1/#comment-90900</link>
		<dc:creator>Martyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/would-hillary-have-won-iowa-without-edwards/#comment-90900</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed,Bill and Hillary never make a mistake, it&#039;s always some one is out to get them.
I&#039;m retired and watched the election very carfully. Before the Iowa vote it was clear to me that Hillary didn&#039;t know who she was. Changed her message every other day or more.Edward&#039;s and Obama stayed with thier orriginal message.There were no other choices for the voter&#039;s in Iowa, they had to vote for Obama. Edward&#039;s meesage was weak in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed,Bill and Hillary never make a mistake, it&#8217;s always some one is out to get them.<br />
I&#8217;m retired and watched the election very carfully. Before the Iowa vote it was clear to me that Hillary didn&#8217;t know who she was. Changed her message every other day or more.Edward&#8217;s and Obama stayed with thier orriginal message.There were no other choices for the voter&#8217;s in Iowa, they had to vote for Obama. Edward&#8217;s meesage was weak in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
