Comments on: About That “Fire Shower of Nuclear Retaliation”

By: Folklight

Folklight — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 11:38:17 +0000

#53 Pat J has it framed: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton previously stated there would be no U.S. economic aid to Pyongyang unless the North returned to the six-party denuclearization talks. South Korea’s Ministry of Strategy and Finance estimated North Korea’s total grain production may reach about 4.3 million tons far short of the minimum 5.1 million tons needed to feed its people.Without sufficient food to protect his troops from hunger KJong may finally come face to face with some very harsh consequences of his own policies. Kjong blaming others for his choices merely spreads misery as the denial kills. Speaking of denial, is that still even considered a negative character trait among politicians? Considering the fact that missiles are useless without accurate guidance systems capable of on target delivery. Loral and Hughes would know. Ahhh Hsu I think the Clintons virus has spread around the world. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Happy 4th Everyone! - GOD BLESS USA -

By: sheesh

sheesh — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:37:37 +0000

53. Pat J . . .” . . . we’ll turn North Korea into a nuclear wasteland.”

What about the millions of innocent men, women and children who would be killed?

By: Paul -Indiana

Paul -Indiana — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:29:46 +0000

#5. So, we could pound them down in ‘a few days’.======
Just what do you think the NKs will be doing during that time? Probably shelling and sending rockets into South Korea. Your analysis indicates you voted for Obama since neither is well thought out.

By: Mike Hadden

Mike Hadden — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:48:34 +0000

American went to war in Korea back in the 50’s, but then signed an armistice essentially placing a hold on the war. North Korea since then has called the armistice off. Therefore are we (the United States) not at war with N. Korea? Why do we need UN pansy approval for boarding a N. Korean ship? Why do we even need to consult the UN?

By: Steynian 369 « Free Canuckistan!

Steynian 369 « Free Canuckistan! — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:01:59 +0000

[...] ~ ITEM: North Korea’s Nuclear Program Is No Joke [...]

By: M. Report

M. Report — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:09:34 +0000

All of the above, plus:

Seoul is built in a river bed;
the dam in in N. Korea, and is
mined.

S. Koreans still have family
feelings for the North, literally.

Assassination Droids might work;
Richard the Lion Heart ended up
paying protection money to the
original Hashasheem because they
left a dagger on his pillow, three
nights running, in spite of all the
guards he had around his tent.

By: Tracy

Tracy — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:59:46 +0000

Read the new novel One Second After. EMP is the problem. Report came out same day as 911 Commission report and was largely ignored. If we are not going to take aggressive military action against rogues, despots and insanity then can we at least defend ourselves and our way of life! Oh Gipper, where are you?

By: Steve

Steve — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:28:28 +0000

This seems eerily similar to all the boasts that a certain guy named Saddam used to make about WMD’s. What do you expect from a guy who is used to telling whoppers like how he played a round of golf and hit 18 hole in ones.

This is South Korea, Japan, and China’s problem. The only way we should come to this fight is if they want to trade our military support for all the US treasury debt they currently hold.

By: LarryD

LarryD — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:18:07 +0000

I’ll point out that the state of war from the Korean War has never been ended, we just stopped shooting at each other on a regular basis. The armistice was violated long ago.

A reiteration of that, with the addition that because of NK recent acts, the US will resume treating NK as a state in full war with the US. With a full on naval blockade. And targeting their missile program, by using their ICBM’s for target practice at a minimum. Invade, no. But put on the pressure to make them sue for a new armistice, at least.

By: Thomas L......

Thomas L...... — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:21:31 +0000

Regime change, pure and simple, should be the only policy of the USA and its allies towards these outright antagonistic pipsqueaks. We don’t take these threats seriously today at great future risk. These days, a mouse can make quite a roar with the right amplification. Considering the behavior of NK and Iran, what I find hard to believe is that there would be any reluctance whatsoever to forcefully encourage and support resistance or, if necessary, actually assist in these changes.