<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Russia With Polonium-210</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:59:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: les hardie</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>les hardie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Someone (one of the French post-Marxist philosophers?) said that &quot;communism was nothing but a criminal gang with an ideology. When the ideology died, all that was left was the criminal gang.&quot; There you have Putin in a nutshell.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone (one of the French post-Marxist philosophers?) said that &#8220;communism was nothing but a criminal gang with an ideology. When the ideology died, all that was left was the criminal gang.&#8221; There you have Putin in a nutshell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanley Krute</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanley Krute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Whoa, wait a minute.

Pres. GW Bush looked into Putin&#039;s soul, and saw that he was a Good Man. Do you not trust his powers of character discernment ?

You disparage my little king by printing these slanders against the valiant Putin.

-- stan

tongue erupting thru cheek

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, wait a minute.</p>
<p>Pres. GW Bush looked into Putin&#8217;s soul, and saw that he was a Good Man. Do you not trust his powers of character discernment ?</p>
<p>You disparage my little king by printing these slanders against the valiant Putin.</p>
<p>&#8211; stan</p>
<p>tongue erupting thru cheek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>By what right does Russia hold the USSR security council seat?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By what right does Russia hold the USSR security council seat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>Sandrina==

What basis? Being an unapologetic and murderous tyranny and a reliable foe of individual freedom is enough basis for me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandrina==</p>
<p>What basis? Being an unapologetic and murderous tyranny and a reliable foe of individual freedom is enough basis for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>I am amazed the pet thug of a loser oligarch with a history of murder and arms dealing is getting such a free ride as an &quot;outspoken critic&quot; of Putin from westerners. Everyone here in Russia just scratches their head and thinks &#039;why would Putin waste time on this clown?&#039;

Not that anyone thinks he isn&#039;t capable of killing people, just for Russia Litvinenko was such a nobody.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am amazed the pet thug of a loser oligarch with a history of murder and arms dealing is getting such a free ride as an &#8220;outspoken critic&#8221; of Putin from westerners. Everyone here in Russia just scratches their head and thinks &#8216;why would Putin waste time on this clown?&#8217;</p>
<p>Not that anyone thinks he isn&#8217;t capable of killing people, just for Russia Litvinenko was such a nobody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandrina Lopetegui</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandrina Lopetegui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>&quot;... which the Soviet Union didn’t deserve either.&quot;

Excuse me? Says who? The Red Army defeated the axis at a greater sacrifice than all the Western nations combined.

On what argument could they deny that great victorious power a permanent UN-SC seat (as of 1945)?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; which the Soviet Union didn’t deserve either.&#8221;</p>
<p>Excuse me? Says who? The Red Army defeated the axis at a greater sacrifice than all the Western nations combined.</p>
<p>On what argument could they deny that great victorious power a permanent UN-SC seat (as of 1945)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davod</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>davod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Fred:

You can leave England out of your &quot;We do their military protection list&quot;.  The US was in England because they needed the basing rights to support the Cold War.  The UK was always a willing partner in the fight.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred:</p>
<p>You can leave England out of your &#8220;We do their military protection list&#8221;.  The US was in England because they needed the basing rights to support the Cold War.  The UK was always a willing partner in the fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnd01</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>johnd01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>fred,

Exactly what bases does the US have in France? How many forces are stationed there?

Bases, forces, a garage full of MRE&#039;s... all the same to you, right? you make it sound like it&#039;s a bad thing.

It&#039;s almost as bad as if your friend from way grade school was now a gazillionare, and just wanted to store his extra HDTV home theatre equipment in your basement. Or your living room. He don&#039;t care. He&#039;ll even thow in some surround sound speakers, show you on how to use it, (and in some cases, how to build it,) and pay you rent for it being there.

On second look, I seem to recall that both Australia and Canada are quite staunch US allies, and some mighty big countries. Can you remind me of the names and locations of all the US bases there? Or where the US stereo equipment is located?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fred,</p>
<p>Exactly what bases does the US have in France? How many forces are stationed there?</p>
<p>Bases, forces, a garage full of MRE&#8217;s&#8230; all the same to you, right? you make it sound like it&#8217;s a bad thing.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost as bad as if your friend from way grade school was now a gazillionare, and just wanted to store his extra HDTV home theatre equipment in your basement. Or your living room. He don&#8217;t care. He&#8217;ll even thow in some surround sound speakers, show you on how to use it, (and in some cases, how to build it,) and pay you rent for it being there.</p>
<p>On second look, I seem to recall that both Australia and Canada are quite staunch US allies, and some mighty big countries. Can you remind me of the names and locations of all the US bases there? Or where the US stereo equipment is located?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee W. Dodson</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee W. Dodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 06:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>We should remember that Putin does not operate in a vacuum, nor does he wield sole authority in Russia, and while he is powerful, his enablers have nearly equal authority. The man will retire soon, and his replacement will exercise even more power.

The United States operates from a very different platform, and considering today&#039;s political climate, our system is ill-equipped to deal with terrorism as effectively as Russia does. Their opposition risks personal death with the slightest objection. Our opposition risks civilization.

Indeed, the delicate balance between opposition and efficacy in this country is at once lifeline and tripwire. Lifeline upon which future freedom depends, tripwire with which to Claymore liberal democracy into oblivion.

The United States, curiously, can only count on other English speaking countries and a few lately liberated other countries with vibrant and vital Christian populations as soul sisters in conflict. The rest are merely remoras that grudgingly attach themselves for a short and convenient period to gain points for future trade-offs.

The world&#039;s organizational status is in upheaval after a brief respite. Things have changed. One might remember the elecrtic light bulb and its eventual impact on darkness. WTC was a major move in the opposite direction.

This war was never an option like some two-bit prize fight on a Thursday night. It is a more serious business than World War II.

Our job, as the thinkers and ponderers of this new age, is to forego linear thinking, to engulf this era with supreme lateral examination so that we may place Putin, et al, in proper perspective and against a backdrop of three dimensional history.

History right now is not a snapshot of one individual, nor is it a group shot of a graduating class. It is cinema 360, going on all around us, and we should hold tight the truth that we are not on the screen, we are on the focal point smack in the center.

Odd, though. This may be as alive as we ever get to be.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should remember that Putin does not operate in a vacuum, nor does he wield sole authority in Russia, and while he is powerful, his enablers have nearly equal authority. The man will retire soon, and his replacement will exercise even more power.</p>
<p>The United States operates from a very different platform, and considering today&#8217;s political climate, our system is ill-equipped to deal with terrorism as effectively as Russia does. Their opposition risks personal death with the slightest objection. Our opposition risks civilization.</p>
<p>Indeed, the delicate balance between opposition and efficacy in this country is at once lifeline and tripwire. Lifeline upon which future freedom depends, tripwire with which to Claymore liberal democracy into oblivion.</p>
<p>The United States, curiously, can only count on other English speaking countries and a few lately liberated other countries with vibrant and vital Christian populations as soul sisters in conflict. The rest are merely remoras that grudgingly attach themselves for a short and convenient period to gain points for future trade-offs.</p>
<p>The world&#8217;s organizational status is in upheaval after a brief respite. Things have changed. One might remember the elecrtic light bulb and its eventual impact on darkness. WTC was a major move in the opposite direction.</p>
<p>This war was never an option like some two-bit prize fight on a Thursday night. It is a more serious business than World War II.</p>
<p>Our job, as the thinkers and ponderers of this new age, is to forego linear thinking, to engulf this era with supreme lateral examination so that we may place Putin, et al, in proper perspective and against a backdrop of three dimensional history.</p>
<p>History right now is not a snapshot of one individual, nor is it a group shot of a graduating class. It is cinema 360, going on all around us, and we should hold tight the truth that we are not on the screen, we are on the focal point smack in the center.</p>
<p>Odd, though. This may be as alive as we ever get to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kroll Jr</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/from_russia_with_polonium210/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kroll Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/11/24/from-russia-with-polonium-210/#comment-355</guid>
		<description>The leader of the Orange Revolution is poisoned by dioxin, the active ingredient in Agent Orange. Litvinenko, with a Ukrainian/Polish (?) surname, is destroyed by the element, polonium, discovered by the Pole Marie Curie and named for her homeland. These abundant, and utterly toxic ironies make the message (and warning) garishly unmistakable and entirely characteristic of the cold-eyed Chekists who have called the Russian tune since 1917. What&#039;s next? Methylated Khvanchkara? Rose attar bombs in Tblisi? Their creativity knows no bounds. Or national boundaries.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The leader of the Orange Revolution is poisoned by dioxin, the active ingredient in Agent Orange. Litvinenko, with a Ukrainian/Polish (?) surname, is destroyed by the element, polonium, discovered by the Pole Marie Curie and named for her homeland. These abundant, and utterly toxic ironies make the message (and warning) garishly unmistakable and entirely characteristic of the cold-eyed Chekists who have called the Russian tune since 1917. What&#8217;s next? Methylated Khvanchkara? Rose attar bombs in Tblisi? Their creativity knows no bounds. Or national boundaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
