The Rosett Report

March 14th, 2008 1:54 am

Saddam Hussein’s Coalition of Terrorists

Was Saddam connected to terrorism? His regime was rolling in it — according to a newly released, Pentagon-sponsored study based on documentation in the Harmony database of captured records of Saddam’s own government.

Is that what we’re reading in the headlines? Of course not, as Stephen Hayes points out in a Weekly Standard blog post that highlights the real news in this report – which ABC News has posted, even if no one there appears to have read it. Over at the NY Times, or ABC, as Hayes notes, the main point, the big “gotcha” for anyone who thinks Saddam needed overthrowing, is that this study did not find a “direct connection” between Saddam’s regime and al Qaeda. (though the study — as its authors state — was based on only a fraction of the massive and only partially translated Harmony database, and some records of the Iraqi regime were never captured).

But just because no one’s produced a candid photo of Saddam and Osama with arms entwined across a bag of bombs and cash, don’t rule out Al Qaeda, or Saddam’s cultivation of a sprawling network of terrorists. Here’s just a sample of what the report goes on to say:

“Saddam’s interest in, and support for, non-Iraqi non-state actors was spread across a wide variety of revolutionary, liberation, nationalist, and Islamic terrorist organizations. For years, Saddam maintained training camps for “fighters” drawn from these diverse groups. In some cases, particularly for Palestinians, Saddam was also a strong financial supporter. Saddam supported groups that either associated directly with al Qaeda (such as the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, led at one time by bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri) or that generally shared al Qaeda’s goals and stated objectives.”

Or here’s a pithy phrase — based on Saddam’s own archives: “Iraq was a long-standing supporter of international terrorism.”

Here’s another: “From 1991 through 2003, the Saddam regime regarded inspiring, sponsoring, directing, and executing acts of terrorism as an element of state power.”

Here’s another: “State sponsorship of terrorism became such a routine tool of state power that Iraq developed elaborate bureaucratic processes to monitor progress and accountability in the recruiting, training and resourcing of terrorists.”

Or check out the information on Saddam’s regime providing a haven to terrorist Abu Abbas and his wife, with documents detailing “procedures for accepting Abu al-Abbas and his wife as residents and providing them with Iraqi diplomatic passports so the couple could move freely within the Middle East.”

Or the shopping list for equipment to be sent to train “Sudanese fighters” — including 15,000 Kalashnikov 7.62-mm rifles, 15,000 [SKS] rifes; 5,000 Markarov [sic] pistols and 1 high quality photocopier” (note, this was while Iraq was under UN sanctions).

Likewise intriguing is a list of weapons inventoried by Saddam’s regime as stocked at some of Iraq’s embassies abroad as of July, 2002. These included plastic explosives and booby-trapped suitcases at Iraqi embassies in India, Thailand, Azerbaijan and Lebanon; TNT in Pakistan; explosive charges in Athens; missile launchers and missiles in the Czech Republic, Turkey, Yemen and Romania…. and the list goes on, and the report goes on, and on, and here, once again, for convenience, is a link to the report, which really is worth reading: “Saddam and Terrorism: Emerging Insights from Captured Iraqi Documents, Volume I (Redacted).”

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

5 Comments

1. vb:

Saddam and al Qaeda shared not goals but strategy: create chaos, eliminate enemies one by one, and declare yourself savior of the Islamic world. The last step would be accomplished when the biggest man left drew his sword through the neck of the second biggest.

Mar 14, 2008 - 10:28 am 2. BLOC:

Thank you, Claudia. This synopsis is very, very useful.

Brian

Mar 14, 2008 - 1:17 pm 3. Mikhail Evzlin. Madrid. Spain:

The anti-war protesters forget or don’t want to remember that the War in Iraq was against the absolutely criminal regime that killed political adversaries and ethnic and religious groups (at least 1.000.000 killed by the political police of Saadam Hussein according the most moderated estimation). I’ll never forget the photographs of the trucks full of bodies of Kurds killed with poisonous gas (The Gulf War, 1991). For all these liberal, that criticize Bush’s policies, these dead have no importance, like the infinite victims of communist terror. Why this indifference for the innocent people and why this anxiety for the criminals instead? In Stalinist Russia common criminals were called by the authorities “social allies”. So also for the liberals the criminals, dictators, terrorists are “social allies”.
The presence of the American troops in Iraq has broken a system of not only Islamist, but international terrorism, because Iraq under Saadam Hyssein was the Promised Land of all the terrorist groups, western and eastern, communist and Islamist. That’s why pacifists, that always defended the most criminal dictatorships, communist, fascist (do not forget that fascism is direct derivation from the socialist parties) and now Islamist, that infernal synthesis of both, hate so ardently President Bush who destroyed the Taliban’s and Saadam Hussein’s absolutely monstrous regimes. It is stupid to say that Saadam Hussein did not have connexions with Al Qaeda. He had connexions with all the terrorist organizations, not only with Al Qaeda. His “State” was transformed in a terrorist organization, like Stalinist Russia, Maoist China, North Korea, Castrist Cuba or Islamic Iran. The stupid French foreign minister has said “We have to talk with our enemies”. How is it possible to talk with terrorists who have as one and only goal to kill you?
I know well from my own experience the horror of totalitarian communist regime and can imagine what Islamofascist dictatorships means, so I feel an admiration for this truly great man as George W. Bush. The History will not change her course for whims of “liberal” politicians who desperately fight for their political survival, using the lowest procedures that in the end will harm them. Mankind’s survival is at stake, under the constant menace of some evil forces of destruction loomed up from the underground of the World. And it is the historical task of the United States to fight them: they cannot fail, if we still want to live in a human world and not in an Islamic or communist sewer.

Mar 15, 2008 - 5:22 am 4. Proud Brit:

>> And it is the historical task of the United States to fight them: they cannot fail, if we still want to live in a human world and not in an Islamic or communist sewer.

lol @ historical. It’s people like you one hopes would never get into a role of leadership. Twat!

Mar 15, 2008 - 6:04 pm 5. Mark Eichenlaub:

Excellent piece Claudia. It’s a disgrace what the media is getting away with on this story.

Mar 16, 2008 - 11:56 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments:
 

Claudia Rosett

Author Photo

Archives