<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That Sound Was the Courtroom Door Slamming Shut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/that_sound_was_the_courtroom_d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/that_sound_was_the_courtroom_d/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:41:08 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian F. Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/that_sound_was_the_courtroom_d/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian F. Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2008/04/12/that-sound-was-the-courtroom-door-slamming-shut/#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>I guess what I&#039;d heard was correct about the court being cleared at Friday&#039;s hearing.  I agree with Claudia that we should not write off that we may still learn more.

In this instance the defedants were allegedly concerned about their privacy rights.  In the 9/11 litigation for wrongful death and personal injury, the aviation defendants were concerned about proprietory information, but thanks to seven dogged plaintiffs, who are pushing for creation of a public archive from what has been uncovered in discovery, we may soon see a significant body of information added to the 9/11 public record.

So, hopefully, something similar might occur to address the transparency issue in the 9/11 litigation dealing with terrorist financing. Hopefully, the press will continue to push in this regard.  I know the Reporters&#039; Committee for Freedom of the Press has filed an Amicus brief, in support of the victims&#039; families&#039; motion to create a public archive in the wronful death suits.  Maybe pressure from the press can also help push for more transparency in the 9/11 terrorist financing suit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what I&#8217;d heard was correct about the court being cleared at Friday&#8217;s hearing.  I agree with Claudia that we should not write off that we may still learn more.</p>
<p>In this instance the defedants were allegedly concerned about their privacy rights.  In the 9/11 litigation for wrongful death and personal injury, the aviation defendants were concerned about proprietory information, but thanks to seven dogged plaintiffs, who are pushing for creation of a public archive from what has been uncovered in discovery, we may soon see a significant body of information added to the 9/11 public record.</p>
<p>So, hopefully, something similar might occur to address the transparency issue in the 9/11 litigation dealing with terrorist financing. Hopefully, the press will continue to push in this regard.  I know the Reporters&#8217; Committee for Freedom of the Press has filed an Amicus brief, in support of the victims&#8217; families&#8217; motion to create a public archive in the wronful death suits.  Maybe pressure from the press can also help push for more transparency in the 9/11 terrorist financing suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
