Spawning and spreading terror, ordering up assassinations in other sovereign states; taking British hostages; swanning around with Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez in America’s backyard; cultivating business buddies in China, Russia and North Korea’s all-military all-the-time nuclear regime; threatening Israel; extolling mushroom clouds; taunting America from the UN stage in New York; and playing gunboat chicken last weekend with U.S. Navy ships. Anyone care to start an office pool on when Tehran actually tests that nuclear bomb?
Those U.S. Navy ships, even when threatened that those Iranian gunboats were about to “explode” them, did not open fire — not even a warning shot.
But let’s take what we can get. Hallelujah, at least Treasury today had the gumption to blacklist one Syrian “entity” and four individuals, one based in Syria and three based in Iran, for “fueling violence and destruction in Iraq.” These blacklisted individuals are not exactly free-lance mavericks. One of them, Ahmad Foruzandeh, is an Iranian brigadier general and commanding officer of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (widely believed to run those gunboats that threatened three U.S. Navy ships last weekend in the Strait of Hormuz, and last March took hostage 15 British sailors). The “entity” is no mere drop box; it’s a TV station based in Syria.
It’s not clear whether the run-in with Iranian gunboats threatening to “explode” the U.S. ships was what triggered this latest Treasury move. The timing, coming so soon after the incident, does have at least the beneficial effect of looking like some sort of U.S. response less grotesquely feeble than diplomatic flutterings.
But will Iran’s theocratic terrorist thugs be impressed? That’s also very unclear. Sanctions on oil rich terror-based states, or individuals therein, are tough to enforce. Iran’s business buddies, including Russia, China, and assorted high-ranking wheeler-dealers in the Middle East, have a rich history of ignoring such measures (remember the UN sanctions and the Oil-for-Food graft bonanza in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq).
The cold comfort may be that Treasury has at least done Americans the favor of spelling out the threat these designated individuals (and the TV station) pose, and highlighting the milieu in which they operate, and where the trails lead. Here’s U.S. Under-Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Stuart Levey, quoted in today’s Treasury press release about these new blacklistings:
“Iran trains, funds and provides weapons to violent Shia extremist groups, while Syria provides safe haven to Sunni insurgents and financiers.” Foruzandeh, of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, for example, “leads terrorist operations against Coalition Forces and Iraqi Security Forces, and directs assassination of Iraqi figures.”
Lest anyone think the Iranian campaign of carnage, assassinations and other terrorist endeavors is limited to Iraq, Treasury spelled out that the Revolutionary Guard Corps, or Quds Force, “is the regime’s primary mechanism for cultivating and supporting terrorists and Islamic militants to advance Iranian national interests. The Quds Force provides training, weapons, and financial support to surrogate groups and terrorist organizations including: Lebanese Hezbollah; Palestinian terrorists; Iraq Shia militant groups; the Taliban and Islamic militants in Afghanistan, the Balkans and elsewhere.”
Here’s a link to the Treasury press release.


Digg This
del.icio.us

PJM Home


1 Comment
1. Mark Ducharme:Doing “good works” may not get His believers into heaven, but Americas’ lack of bold works will surely lead to hell on earth for many innocents.
How different would the world be had we dropped a “Daisy Cutter” on Berchtesgaden in February of ‘38 while those evil men planned “The final solution” ? I know, it’s much different now. Back then, they weren’t telegraphing their every move. Back then, we hadn’t just spent 60+ years promising to, “Never forget, never.”.(If we had, the Japs probably would’ve bombed Berlin)
Could it be that “General Jack D. Ripper” was on to something when he refered to the,”Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids”? Now, I know the good General is a fictionalized geopolitical theorist, and a leftys’ satirical(streotypical?) vision of one at that, but what is the explanation for such a reversal from what worked as recently as Reagans dealings with “The evil empire”? Hell, with Afganistan,Iraq, the taliban and al kkkeda right now, for that matter. And I don’t buy it that we’re spread too thin. Reagan didn’t fire a shot. He was backed up by an arsenal.
Those zany Iranians have been living a life of sin for nigh on 30 years and have yet to pay the piper. Their baptism by full immersion is inevitable and the longer that event is stalled, the hotter its fires will burn. We nuked Japan and they’re doing great. We spared Germany the nuke, and they are ungrateful little children.We saved the rest of Europe and they spit on us. We won a stand-off with the Soviets, and they are sinking back into the pits of facism. There’s only one way to save us from Iran, and that is to save her from herself.
Unfortunately,there is no one left(or right even), who still has their “essence”. Surely, they wouldn’t deny us of it if they had it. Hmm, must be the water.(there’s definitely some strange brew, down in those wacky Straights of Hormuz)If “W” had a stroke, what would Cheney do? Just wondering…
Jan 10, 2008 - 2:23 pm