The news networks are consumed right now with discussion of the warning signs flashed by Cho Seung-Hui… How could authorities have dismissed them? Why didn’t anyone act? What might have been done?
Meanwhile, linked below is a great big warning sign, flashed by an outfit that has already demonstrated its devotion to mass murder, is racing to acquire the world’s deadliest weapons, whose president has shown considerable interest in annihilating an entire nation of seven million people and whose chant is “Death to Israel! Death to America!” What are we doing about this?
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
3 Comments
1. bourne2y:Offhand, I can think of only one group of people who said never again after a tragedy – and really meant it.
Apr 19, 2007 - 8:04 pm 2. Brian:Indeed . . .
We castigate our leaders, and the intelligence agencies that are supposed to inform them, for not having connected the dots and prevented 9/11.
We cast helplessly about for “reasons” — dots to connect — for what underlay the horrific events at VTU in order to prevent a repetition (a comforting fantasy, perhaps, but scarcely a realistic possibility, given the infinite ways a nut case has to produce carnage).
And, in the case of Iran, we have dots a-plenty, enough to create an unbroken line.
And what do we do?
Apr 19, 2007 - 8:20 pm 3. Alex Reed:As usual, Ms. Rosett has asked the most important question: “What are we doing about this?” We should make no mistake about it, our lives will depend upon the answers. Western countries still seem to be auditioning different possibilities, rather like trying on different costumes for a Venetian ballo in maschero. Thus far, nothing qualifies as upholding a bella figura for any western government, nor much prospect for a peaceful future.
Apr 25, 2007 - 9:08 pmIt took only a few days from the time of Ms. Rosett’s question for the latest rack of costumes to appear.
Michael Ledeen, in his latest article in National Review Online, notes yet another astonishing démarche from our Secretary of State, and her wizard team at State who continue their hot rendition (sorry) of Miss You for the mullahs of Tehran and their front man, President Ahmadinejad. Secretary Rice has confided, in an interview with The Financial Times, her heartfelt hopes that Iranian foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, will deign to stop in at the Iraq: Let’s Make a Deal meeting in Egypt. It puts one in mind of an invitation to a piranha to come look over the latest shipment of scuba tourists. The interview is at the same time revealing and disheartening especially for its wishful, dare I say delusional, thinking about both the nature of our would-be interlocutors and the global situation in which we currently find ourselves. No encouraging answers to Ms. Rosett’s question here.
Meanwhile, moving along to Old Europe, one can sense some Continental Drift. We find that the profound and refined thinkers of the Continent have come up with a new approach in answering Ms. Rosett’s question. As reported in today’s Washington Times, the ever-inventive Javier Solana, the EU’s foreign policy maven, plans to introduce a new continental subtlety into talks with Iran’s Mr. Nuclear, Ali Larijani, about the bothersome problem of Iran’s turbo-charged uranium enrichment program. Mr. Solana’s solution to the current impasse is elegant in its simplicity. Since Iran refuses to stop its uranium enrichment program, Mr. Solana will simply redefine “enrichment” until he gets a crocodile smile from Mr. Larijani. The mere illusion of progress will suffice for the tired old continent to persist in its alternate reality. Redefine reality until it fits the dream of quietude, however frangible, and Old Europe will sleep on.
One begins to suspect that it would not be difficult to diagnose, on the basis of such evidence, a planetary mental disorder. Nothing like a spot of worldwide psychosis to concentrate the mind of anyone still asking questions….