The data-manipulating emails of Climategate have made a splash, with damning implications for the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. But is this just the tip of the UN climate con iceberg?
Shepherding, rewarding and promoting global alarm about “climate change” is a whopping beneficiary of this movement (bigger even than Al Gore) — the United Nations global system. Failing to achieve forward motion for peace or nonproliferation, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has been grandstanding for more than two years about the UN’s war on the weather — and has made it his chief mission to persuade developed nations to “seal the deal” on a “climate” pact that would constrict production, transfer vast amounts to wealth to some of the worst governments on the planet, and put the unaccountable, opaque and too often self-serving bureaucracy of the UN at the switch. The UN’s IPCC collected the other half of the Al Gore Nobel Weather Prize, but do UN insiders really believe the IPCC is a bastion of untainted science? (If you want to check out who’s providing “guidance” for the IPCC, check out their web site – some of my favorites on the current roster are Iran, Cuba and Sudan).
Climate bureaucracy has become a major aspect of employment throughout the UN system, with almost every UN agency and program enlisting fresh bevies of staff to work the climate angles. On its climate “Gateway” web page, the UN lists more than three dozen UN-system “partners on climate change,” from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to the UN Development Program (star of the Cash-for-Kim scandal two years ago in North Korea) to the International Telecommunications Union. On the basis of calculations performed deep within the entrails of UN bureacracies that thrive these days by attributing the world’s troubles to climate and then allocating blame, penalties, bonanzas and UN commissions on the basis of the IPCC “scientific consensus,” this same UN climate Gateway web page informs us that “Seven of ten disasters are climate related.” To fix this, the UN tells us, we need only trust to the UN’s guidance. That would be the same UN that not so long ago dealt with its own propensity for corruption by disbanding its anti-corruption task force; the same UN that once claimed Oil-for-Food was the most heavily audited program it had ever run; the same UN that can’t tally its own global budget.
And of course, just ahead lies the Copenhagen climate summit, with Ban calling for a deal to be sealed which, with great pain for the world’s most productive societies, and great gain for the UN’s expanding empire of carbon-0-crats, “satisfies the demands of science.” That would be the UN version of science, which, if it bears any resemblance to the UN version of book-keeping, should give great pause. The UN has immense vested interests here, and is clearly prepared to roll right over the disclosures of climategate. These are decisions which within the UN go way beyond the IPCC, and involve UN officials — all the way up to Ban Ki-moon — ignoring any genuine scientific dissent that doesn’t fit their plans, or fill the UN coffers. What would we see were we able to peer into the “climate” emails exchanged throughout the UN system over the years? Just asking.
PJM Home
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
46 Comments
1. The Rosett Report » When Do We Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change? « Snow Report Blog:[...] via The Rosett Report » When Do We Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change?. [...]
Nov 30, 2009 - 11:02 pm 2. Pajamas Media » The Tip of the Climate Con: Where are the UN Climate Change Emails?:[...] Read the rest of the story here. [...]
Dec 1, 2009 - 1:28 am 3. David Thomson:We can be thankful that none of the world’s governments will enact any of the UN’s policy decisions. They will simply be thrown in the proverbial file 13. Only those American elected officials residing in the bluest districts will dare vote for this nonsense. Purple and red politicians are running for the hills. This most recent e-mail scandal may be the final nail in the coffin. Unfortunately, it will take awhile longer to eliminate the great paying jobs of these buffoons. They will have it made for a few more years.
Dec 1, 2009 - 3:48 am 4. steve macdonald:Great Post!
Dec 1, 2009 - 4:44 am 5. Instapundit » Blog Archive » CLAUDIA ROSETT: When Do We Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change?…:Following the spirit of your very limited list of failures and corrupt practices, I can think of no area where I trust this institution (UN) – not one.
The fact that the head of the IPCC has PHDs in economics and industrial engineering rather than a science related to climate is illustrative.
[...] CLAUDIA ROSETT: When Do We Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change? [...]
Dec 1, 2009 - 5:08 am 6. egoist:Good point(s). From where I sit, everyone is untouchable; remember the scandals w/ UN & Iraq, countless scandals in Congress… This must have been what France was like a 20-some-odd decades ago.
Dec 1, 2009 - 5:19 am 7. Fearless Leader:What a great way to control the world governments.
You do what we say or we will cut your UN Climate Change funds or increase your cost in carbon footprints.
“THE UN WILL WORK FOR OIL FOOD AND CARBON CREDITS.”
Harry Truman would roll over in his grave-
–Harry S Truman
Give em Hell Harry-
The Buck Stops at the UN.
Dec 1, 2009 - 5:37 am 8. Tweets that mention The Rosett Report » When Do We Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change? -- Topsy.com:[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Captain_Marlow, Kurt Vangsness. Kurt Vangsness said: When Do We Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change? #tcot #globalwarming #green #climate #eco #gwfraud http://bit.ly/8wJqok [...]
Dec 1, 2009 - 5:49 am 9. Terry Gain:What would we see were we able to peer into the “climate” emails exchanged throughout the UN system over the years? Just asking.
Where is a whistle blower or a hacker when you need one?
Dec 1, 2009 - 5:49 am 10. riversty:Madame Rosett,
You don’t seem to understand that the IPCC does absolutely no research. None. Nada. Never did. Instead, it was created as a body to review existing research and publications and come up with, well, a conclusion. Theirs is that a clear majority (but not all) of scientific literature says that AGW is real. Your qualm should really not be about them, but at the scientific literature and establishment. So… There are no UN climate emails.
Also, the members of the IPCC do not represent their states. They are hired exclusively for their academic qualifications, which an overwhelming number obtained at Western universities. Is that a problem? Is an individual from Iran, Sudan or Cuba, who wanted to become a scientist and had the initiative to study in the West a prior a bad person? Please let me know…
styx
Dec 1, 2009 - 5:58 am 11. Mike_K:Maybe ACORN should be put in charge of our UN contacts. They might even be relatives or the same people. They certainly share an ethical code.
Dec 1, 2009 - 6:10 am 12. Brian Richard Allen:That the feral gummint of these united States of America continues to get away with squandering Billions of Dollars of the confiscated wealth of America’s (and therefore of the world’s!) most creative, innovative, productive and industrious upon the shower of third-world dictators, murderers, gangsters, bums and other thugs that comprise the un’s membership and bureaucracy, talks only to the desire of those who pull the levers of our beloved fraternal republic’s power to get as much of our confiscated wealth as they possibly can into the hands of those who kick-back so damned much of it into the likes of, say, Chelsea Cli’ton’s and the Kerry and Gore kids’ already bulging with Billions Bahamas-based “trust” funds.
Brian Richard Allen
Dec 1, 2009 - 6:23 am 13. Theo Goodwin:Lost Angeles – Caliobambicated 90028
And the Very Far Abroad
riversty writes:
“They are hired exclusively for their academic qualifications, which an overwhelming number obtained at Western universities. Is that a problem? Is an individual from Iran, Sudan or Cuba, who wanted to become a scientist and had the initiative to study in the West a prior a bad person? Please let me know…”
No, they are bad scientists. Their approval of CRU work reveals, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that they have no comprehension of scientific method whatsoever. There is a moral element in scientific method and it requires complete transparency in data and methods so that other scientists can check the work and, if desired, attempt to replicate it. Phil Jones and his cronies know nothing of this or have consciously embraced the subversion of moral science.
You should not be dismayed at Ms. Rosett’s dismay. Here, in America, the Jones kind of anti-science arouses the same reaction as one, old stinking corpse. It arouses dismay. Apparently, the same is not true for you and yours.
Here, in America, we will clean house. Scientistis of great reputation, institute directors, and politicians will lose their jobs over Climategate. It might take as long as a year, but we want to be careful in these proceedings.
Dec 1, 2009 - 6:36 am 14. Dana H.:Actually, I’d rather see the NASA GISS emails. In his public pronouncements, Jim Hansen has been even more of a loon than Mann and Jones. And Steve McIntyre has raised serious questions about the way the GISS temperature history data have been massaged. GISS provides the other major temperature history besides CRU that has been used to justify global warming alarmism. We already know that there are serious problems with the GISS raw data (see surfacestations.org). If in addition the processing of these data have been as sloppy as with the CRU data, then we literally have no idea whether or how much the earth’s surface has warmed over the past few decades.
So I’d be very curious to see what Hansen et al. reveal in their correspondence with each other. And I’d *really* like to see the comments of the engineers working on their software code. With luck, Inhofe will subpoena these.
Dec 1, 2009 - 6:45 am 15. WestWright:Riversty/stix, I think it it you that doesn’t appear to understand the UN/IPCC depth of depravity! Madame Rossett has an emminent record of exposing the danger to freedom that is the UN, awa it’s criminality and uselessness. I think you should read some of Ms. Rossett’s investigations of the UN, I recommend you start with the corruption associated with the Oil for Food scandal that enabled Saddam to starve & murder millions of his own citizens. Open your eyes and your mind to this evil that is manifested in the UN!
Dec 1, 2009 - 6:56 am 16. someguy:“When Do We Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change?”
Some of the most damning emails and data are being held back until the East Anglia scientists try to mount their expected defense.
Once they do … then new previously unreleased emails will be produced to demonstrate that certain scientists are liars. These new emails and data (so far withheld) will then be produced to prove that the defense the East Anglia perpetrators just offered is a farce.
So, keep watching.
Dec 1, 2009 - 6:57 am 17. Poor Citizen:My left wing friends are convinced that Al Gore and others are correct that the world is polluted and the ozone and the atmosphere is heating up. My right wing friends are saying that world is doing just fine and that pollution means progress and the world will eventually fix itself. However, the good news is for capitalism. The news reports that no matter what we decide to to about global warming, some of it is too late and that the north polar cap will split by 2030 which will shorten travel times between several countries, hence, great for business !! so there, its not all doom and gloom….is it.
Dec 1, 2009 - 6:58 am 18. Bud Martin:Since when does an external, non-scientific, politicized body get to determine what is “settled science”? The last time I can recall was the geocentric universe.
Dec 1, 2009 - 7:21 am 19. Edward Sisson:The heart of your excellent post, with a little shortening, is as follows, that everyone who follows this issue should recognize:
“Failing to achieve forward motion for peace or nonproliferation, [United Nations] Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has been grandstanding for more than two years about the UN’s war on the weather …. Climate bureaucracy has become a major aspect of employment throughout the UN system, with almost every UN agency and program enlisting fresh bevies of staff to work the climate angles. … UN bureaucracies [] thrive these days by attributing the world’s troubles to climate and then allocating blame, penalties, bonanzas …. [A] UN climate Gateway web page informs us that “Seven of ten disasters are climate related.” To fix this, the UN tells us, we need only trust to the UN’s guidance. … The UN has immense vested interests here, and is clearly prepared to roll right over the disclosures of climategate.”
Understanding the institutional motivation is the key to understanding what is going on, and it is, as it always is, the transfer of wealth under the cloak of idealism. Years ago it was the Law of the Sea Treaty, now the climate effort. The “UN war on the weather” — quite so. Read the 1852 book “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds” by Charles Mackay — man-made global warming has the same indicia of the delusions Mackay describes, such as the Mississippi Scheme and the South Sea Bubble.
Dec 1, 2009 - 7:36 am 20. Kazooskibum:The UN is a criminal enterprise. The truth is coming out.
Dec 1, 2009 - 7:39 am 21. Greg F:Comment #10 (riversty) wrote:
Unfortunately the reviewers are reviewing their own work.
Of course not, they would never use email to conduct IPCC business. Sheesh!
Dec 1, 2009 - 7:40 am 22. 6079SmithW:With respect:
I believe the climate change mantra has become the “Holy Grail” of the UN’s one world government push.
All of this current brouhaha will be glossed over or completely ignored. The “climategate” issue will fade away into oblivion and the UN and gullible world governments (the US’s included) will follow like sheep to the slaughter.
There is way too much money to be made and too much power to be wielded to allow false data misapplied to slow the global warming hysterical juggernaut.
Dec 1, 2009 - 7:41 am 23. uberVU - social comments:Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by kvangs: When Do We Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change? #tcot #globalwarming #green #climate #eco #gwfraud http://bit.ly/8wJqok...
Dec 1, 2009 - 7:42 am 24. Paden Cash:Fearless Leader: I hope that the buck never gets to the UN.
Dec 1, 2009 - 8:03 am 25. David W. Lincoln:There is more, Claudia. Take a look at this http://www.edmontonjournal.com/business/Gary+Lamphier+often+experts+leave+their+footprint+with+feet+clay/2288739/story.html especially the part about the US coal industry.
Frankly, I am in favour of no more oil being sold to the US. Canada is the largest supplier to the US, and frankly it makes more sense to ship the oil to Asia. As for the chest thumping about the US defending Canada militarily, I know this: each commander, regardless of military branch, has a budget. When the budget is spent, nothing happens. So, given the US is flat broke, where is the money going to come from to fund the military?
Dec 1, 2009 - 8:12 am 26. John Blake:Will China accept more debt? I don’t think so.
As revealed by the KGB’s Venona Transcripts, the UN originated as a Soviet-inspired blanket organization charged with papering over Stalin’s Comintern (Communist International) thrust to sabotage and subvert free-market entrepreneurial prosperity worldwide.
Both Harry Hopkins, FDR’s most senior advisor, and Alger Hiss of Pumpkin Papers fame communicated directly with the Moscow Politburo, ensuring that the emerging UN organization would be hamstrung by Soviet vetoes in the Security Council while fostering sub-rosa guerilla insurgencies worldwide (think Huks in Philippines, Vietcong, Castro and Chavez, Chile’s Sendera Luminoso, multiple crapulent African abd Central American regimes). Like Kerry’s full-size statue in Hanoi’s Museum of the Revolution, J. Robert Oppenheimer’s full-length portrait stands in the quondam KGB’s entrance lobby to this day. Evil exists; it lives.
By design, the putative UN enables brutal thugeries from North Korea to Iran, Cuba to Venezuela, Zimbabwe to any West African kleptocracy whatever. Anti-Semitic, tyrannical, racist to the core, after Dag Hammarskjold’s assassination in the Congo (1964) the magical UN has accommodated among others a former Nazi (Waldheim), a Ghanaian grand-larcenist (Annan), now a blithering Korean climate cultist who stated in mid-September 2009 that unless ten trillion dollars (!) was immediately shoveled to his socialist cesspool Planet Earth would become a baking desert in four months (Ban Ki-moon).
In league with nihilistic Muslim terrorists of every stripe, the UN has evolved to a jihadist propaganda platform. The Ugandan democide, Oil for Peace, hosannas for Ahmadinejad’s murderous mullahs are of a piece: In not one single instance since Brezhnev’s invasion of Afghanistan, Iran’s hostage-taking of U.S. diplomatic personnel, nevermind 9/11 or Bush’s carefully vetted toppling of Saddam Hussein, has the UN –Allah be praised– done more than bleat and squeak. Annan’s response to the tsunami that devastated SE Asian littorals in December 2004 was to convene a two-day conference in 5-star Malaysian hotels some three months later. Thanks, Kofi.
By the inexorable rule-of-72, organizations such as the UN definitively outlive their usefulness over two 36-year cycles: Lenin’s Sovietism, for example, lasted from AD 1917 to 1989 (call it 1919 – 1991). Founded on false pretenses, hymned by collectivists’ mindless hype in 1946, Ban Ki-moon’s slushfund-of-choice is due to deliquesce about 2018. Can’t happen soon enough.
Dec 1, 2009 - 8:20 am 27. ronnor:“Obama administration climate czar Carol Browner on Wednesday rejected claims that e-mails stolen from a British university show climate scientists trumped up global warming numbers, saying she considers the science settled.” Here is why: “Santa Clara, CA – March 10, 2008 – APX, Inc., the leading infrastructure provider for environmental and energy markets, announced today that Carol Browner, former Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, has joined its Board of Directors.”
She stands to make millions and her company billions, she was also worked for Al Gore as an aide when he was a Senator. The UN is full of thieves drooling that they just might get some percentage of the GNP of the United States. Remember this, over 75% of UN members murder their own citizens, some even kill them and sell body parts [China].
Dec 1, 2009 - 8:28 am 28. algie:The UN is the only organization to make the US Congress look good in terms of transparency, and
honesty. This takes a lot of effort. The self serving arrogant dirtbags currently sitting in Washington, are so corrupt that only by comparison with the UN can they avoid the title World’s Worst!
I look at Congress and what do I see
A group of drunk monkeys out on a spree
Urged on by their frenzied greed
Blind to fix the nation’s need
Now it is time for the power of T E A
….nnnn..’o.o’..uu!u….algie
Dec 1, 2009 - 8:45 am 29. Climategate: Brit Hume on Fox News « Gathering of Eagles: NY:Illegitimi nOn carborundum
[...] Claudia Rosett asks When do we see the rest of the emails? [...]
Dec 1, 2009 - 8:56 am 30. NCBob:Back off! They were going to release ALL these e-mails last week but couldn’t because the Secretary General’s dog ate them. Yeah, true story!
Dec 1, 2009 - 9:04 am 31. Ole Sandberg:For unsurpassable satire of climate scientists gone wild, read “The Secret Life of Climate Scientists” at http://iowahawk.typepad.com/.
Dec 1, 2009 - 9:07 am 32. LindaS:We get to read the rest of the emails after you file FOI requests for them. There are plenty of organizations involved who are subject to FOI (UK) and FOIA (USA).
Dec 1, 2009 - 9:53 am 33. LindaS:#10 riversty – Almost right. The IPCC was created to report on “human-induced climate change”. It is not their business to report on natural climate change. Of course the result is a collection of human-caused literature.
Dec 1, 2009 - 9:59 am 34. American Solzhenitsyn:Riversty –
You are joking, right? Whether it does reasearch or not, the IPCC is the body that issued the report upon which the largest transfer of wealth in history is being based. Moreover, your statement that its members do not represent their governments is equally ludicrous. You are obviously a troll, so why don’t you just go back under the bridge where you came from?
Dec 1, 2009 - 10:22 am 35. SukieTawdry:Following his tenure as UN Ambassador in the 70s, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, one of the last honorable liberals, called the UN a theater of the absurd, a decomposing corpse, and an insane asylum. In the ensuing years, it’s only gotten worse, exponentially so. We should never, I repeat never, follow its lead.
Dec 1, 2009 - 11:30 am 36. Jack in Silver Spring:I would say that at this point, the United Nations is comparable to the pre-WWII Leage of Nations, but that would demean the League more than it should be demeaned.
Dec 1, 2009 - 11:42 am 37. mojo:Lots of whining about the emails being “taken out of context”…
Ok. Fine. Let’s have some context. Show us the rest of the mail, ALL of it, in context. Let’s see what it says.
Unless you’ve accidentally deleted it, I mean.
Dec 1, 2009 - 12:08 pm 38. Rich Vail:What is really needed at the UN is a complete audit of very program and office…just the US government needs one. Then…simply eliminate all those “jobs programs” that are masquerading as departments, bureaus, etc…won’t happen, but it’s a thought.
Dec 1, 2009 - 1:45 pm 39. John "birther" Samford:#10 riversty
Dec 1, 2009 - 3:40 pm 40. howiem:Follow the money. Since the UN has the most to gain from the AGW scam, it is only reasonable to want to see what they were doing to advance their interests. How much non-official communication was there between the UN and Hadley CRU?
When tracking a criminal conspiracy, it is important to follow each money trail to it’s end. That is how the OIL for Fraud scam was unravelled. The UN as a body knows this.
As I type they are busy deleting and shredding files.
It is worth noting that on the IPCC website http://.ipcc.ch (see Organization link on the left ) it states that
“The IPCC is a scientific body. It reviews and assesses the most recent scientific, technical and socio-economic information produced worldwide relevant to the understanding of climate change. It does NOT conduct any research NOR does it monitor climate related data or parameters. Thousands of scientists from all over the world contribute to the work of the IPCC on a voluntary basis. Review is an essential part of the IPCC process, to ensure an objective and complete assessment of current information. Differing viewpoints existing within the scientific community are reflected in the IPCC reports.”
Comment: Garbage in-Garbage out
The disclaimer on not monitoring “climate related data or parameters” is a fairly recent change, which until the other day could be determined by going to the way-back machine http://www.archive.org/ and looking up the ipcc web site. However, now all the links I tried returned “Not in Archive”.
Dec 1, 2009 - 3:56 pm 41. Berlet98:This looks like a coverup. Unless you try it, don’t come back and say that it is not.
Climategate, Part Two
“You gonna believe Obama or you just wanna believe yer lyin’ eyes, yer dumb brains an’ all that phony evidence out there? We sez it’s so, so it’s so, dammit. Case closed!
Using more diplomatic rhetoric and somewhat better English, thus spaketh chief White House flack-hack Robert Gibbs in response to queries concerning the furor over Climategate.
And, furthermore, he asserted covolutedly, “climate change is happening. I don’t think that’s anything that is, quite frankly, among most people, in dispute anymore:” http://bit.ly/6fga41
Mr. Gibbs, sorry to burst your bubble but your office and the presidency don’t confer upon you or Barack Obama the gift of infallibility or wisdom: The global warming game is up. The deceivers lost, truth won.
The long-running Climategate fiasco, the revelation that much of the scientific community has been distorting, exaggerating, out and out lying, and covering up the facts about climate change for their own vain and venal purposes, is over.
(See “Climategate Part One,” http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1350.)
Look, the warmists had their day, celebs, politicians and money grubbers like Al Gore milked it for all it was worth, pseudo-scientists and academics amassed their grants, and the dark, guiding force behind it all–the United Nations–managed to terrify the planet. . .
(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1353)
Dec 1, 2009 - 11:37 pm 42. Btok:Time is getting short and it is coming down to the fact, that soon ( December 7 to December 18 ) I will have to pray to the good Lord to maintain our freedoms and not allow our leaders to sign the Copenhagen Treaty, which will take away our liberties, let go and let God-this being a challenge to our Lord and Saviour? However, while there is still time to prevent the loss of a lifetime, perhaps loss of life it’s self – I will do what I am able to fight for our freedoms! The whole Climate Change agenda is a proven fraud and racketeering, but the United Nations and Globalist governments don’t care as that is just the excuse instrument they have used to ensnare us! Has everybody out there become a tree hugger? The tree will be standing 100 years from now, but will you be looking at the tree, from inside the fence of a Concentration Camp? Anyone out there want to fight to maintain their freedom anymore? Please do all you can to preserve freedom in North America!
Check out what Government is doing behind your back at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU
Canadians: to request that PM Harper doesn’t sign the Copenhagen Treaty, thereby causing Canadians to lose
their Sovereignty and Freedom email the PM at: pm@pm.gc.ca
Any lawyers want to help out by filing this Copenhagen Treaty be classified as an illegal Treaty, in order to, help save Freedom in North America? ( Unlimited Promotion Opportunity Here For a Law firm to Gain a favorable high profile
Dec 2, 2009 - 4:26 pm 43. westerncanadian:The UN motto: “Global problems require global
Dec 2, 2009 - 10:12 pm 44. westerncanadian:solutionsgovernment.”The UN strategy: “By hook or by crook we’ll make every local problem global. If that fails we’ll invent problems and make them global.”
Oops! I screwed up my HTML code. Time for a beer.
Dec 2, 2009 - 10:14 pm 45. Global Warming Is About The Socialism « Tai-Chi Policy:[...] eagerly await more email and fraud to be observed, with more heads on the chopping [...]
Dec 5, 2009 - 7:52 am 46. Steyniac 401th « Free Canuckistan!:[...] WHEN DO WE Get to Read the Rest of the UN Emails on Climate Change? …. [...]
Dec 11, 2009 - 5:30 pm