Comments on: Who Next at the World Bank? http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/who_next_at_the_world_bank/ Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:59:50 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Sandy http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/who_next_at_the_world_bank/comment-page-1/#comment-741 Sandy Mon, 21 May 2007 03:30:21 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2007/05/18/who-next-at-the-world-bank/#comment-741 How about yourself? (Ed. - Thank you, Sandy. But if the country gets desperate enough to send in a journalist to clean up the Bank, my nominees would be Mark Steyn or P.J. O'Rourke). How about yourself?

(Ed. – Thank you, Sandy. But if the country gets desperate enough to send in a journalist to clean up the Bank, my nominees would be Mark Steyn or P.J. O’Rourke).

]]> By: Jack Jolis http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/who_next_at_the_world_bank/comment-page-1/#comment-740 Jack Jolis Sat, 19 May 2007 11:52:12 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2007/05/18/who-next-at-the-world-bank/#comment-740 Don Imus is your obvious man. What with his kids-with-cancer ranch he already knows all about helping needy people, plus with his wife Deirdre hovering nearby he wouldn't be prone to any Wolfie-type lady imbroglios. Quick-quick, Don Imus. quack-quack. Don Imus is your obvious man. What with his kids-with-cancer ranch he already knows all about helping needy people, plus with his wife Deirdre hovering nearby he wouldn’t be prone to any Wolfie-type lady imbroglios. Quick-quick, Don Imus. quack-quack.

]]> By: Mahon http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/who_next_at_the_world_bank/comment-page-1/#comment-739 Mahon Sat, 19 May 2007 05:23:39 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2007/05/18/who-next-at-the-world-bank/#comment-739 Fun, but futile. This is a job for Joe Lieberman. Not even subject to Senate confirmation. Fun, but futile.

This is a job for Joe Lieberman. Not even subject to Senate confirmation.

]]> By: Aaron http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/who_next_at_the_world_bank/comment-page-1/#comment-738 Aaron Fri, 18 May 2007 17:02:48 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2007/05/18/who-next-at-the-world-bank/#comment-738 I think you are really on to something here. To go a step further, why don't we appoint Bolton for a limited term, say a year and a half or so, and then turn the helm over to an over-qualified candidate sure to get people's attention: George W. Bush? Seriously, though, yours is a terrific idea and would send exactly the right message. I think you are really on to something here.

To go a step further, why don’t we appoint Bolton for a limited term, say a year and a half or so, and then turn the helm over to an over-qualified candidate sure to get people’s attention: George W. Bush?

Seriously, though, yours is a terrific idea and would send exactly the right message.

]]>