UN sanctions are only as useful as the will of the feckless UN to enforce anything — and the usual practice at the UN is to prevaricate and cheat. Previous U.S. ambassadors to the UN, such as Richard Holbrooke and John Negroponte, have had a dismal record of calling the UN to account on such stuff — remember Oil-for-Food. John Bolton has managed the amazing art of getting resolutions passed while still– as far as possible for anyone working for the State Department — telling it like it is. With John Bolton soon to be gone, what’s the value of UN sanctions on North Korea?
The Rosett Report
October 15th, 2006 4:20 am
Without Bolton, What Happens With UN Sanctions on North Korea?
Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers
| Comment | Digg This |
del.icio.us |
![]() |
![]() |
PJM Home |


Digg This
del.icio.us

PJM Home


1 Comment
1. Gayle Miller:Good reason for a loud, noisy and incessant campaign to be raised for Bolton’s retention RIGHT WHERE HE IS.
Also another good reason to vote Republican - retaining both Houses of Congress would be a salubrious splash of icy water in the face of the leftist scum inhabiting parts of Congress AND give our President the wherewithal to renominate and CONFIRM Mr. Bolton!
Oct 17, 2006 - 4:50 pm