Jim Treacher writes, “To the people who are comparing this to the Imus debacle: Do what you want, but I have no interest in emulating Al Sharpton. He demands an apology and then, when it’s given, turns it down as insufficiently sincere.” In contrast, Jim writes:
Since I’m being congratulated on both the left and the left for starting the ball rolling on this — I can’t take all the credit, guys, but thanks for the high praise — it’s probably expected of me to give a public response to Letterman’s apology last night.
He did the right thing.
He gave an apology in which he actually apologized to the specific people he wronged. Which, to some observers, is apparently optional. I don’t think it is, nor does anyone else who’s honest enough to admit what the word “apology” means, so I’m glad he specifically included an expression of regret for his actions.
And he named the wronged parties, particularly Willow and Bristol Palin. That’s the main thing. Whether he intended it or not, he hurt a kid whose only crime was going to a baseball game, and her older sister, whose only crime was having a child out of wedlock just like David Letterman. Well, that’s putting aside the unforgivable crime of being born to Sarah Palin.
He said he was sorry, and he didn’t play it for laughs (mostly). It might be a week late, but he did finally swallow his considerable pride and say it. And it only took half as long as the last “apology,” maybe because he didn’t yet again read off the jokes that got him in trouble in the first place and wait for the audience to applaud him for it.
That seems fair. In 2006, Letterman began to publicly adopt a sharply partisan leftwing stance, breaking with the liberal but cooler and more politically aloof style of his late idol and mentor, Johnny Carson. And as this latest flap illustrates, he seems to be permanently stuck in the world that existed prior to the election of President Obama, where George W. Bush is still in the White House and Sarah Palin is still running to be the next vice-president. I’m sure Letterman will find another target on the right to attack soon enough.





PJM Home





Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
3 Comments
1. Gaffe Prices:I agree, let’s let this go right at this point. No more attention should be paid to Letterman or how he apologised, no matter how hollow it rings, he still apologised, he did the best he can do: Two wrongs don’t make a right.
Having said that, I still want to see all involved with Imus’ firing with their heads on a stick, for all the obvious first amendment reasons, but it doesn’t mean I should have my way on that.
Letterman goes, he stays, makes no difference to me, he went downhill decades ago: he still should not be ‘fired’ over this. Check out Greg Gutfeld’s take on this. Letterman should be quietly shunned.
I don’t want to engage in the kind of vindictive fascism of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, despite any temptation to do likewise as they do.
Jun 16, 2009 - 1:03 pm 2. Bob:This planned incident was bait for the right…shortly every passionate statement made by Rush or Levin will be paraded on the airwaves and the Left will demand they be canned.
Jun 17, 2009 - 12:08 pm 3. Steynian 365 « Free Canuckistan!:Who cares what anybody sats?
[...] TREACHER: “Hey, How About We Accept Letterman’s Apology?”; and Lileks– “Comedy Is Hard. Those [...]
Jun 19, 2009 - 4:28 pmSorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.