July 13th, 2009 1:30 pm

Some Narratives Are Better Than Others

Betsy Newmark spots Diane Feinstein “gushing yesterday on Fox News Sunday about Sonia Sotomayor’s personal story”:

And what has been amazing to me is how she’s overcome adversity and disadvantage and carried on and done it basically by herself. She’s an amazing story, and I think that’s been written up now. I think people are beginning to understand her.

And you know, she’s entered into some 3,000 appeals. She’s tried 400 cases. She’s written opinions. Obviously, people will find this or that they don’t like.

But overall, the story is so encouraging — it is so much a part of the American dream — and she has done so well at what she’s done, it’s really — I take enormous pride as a woman in voting for her. And I never say how I’m going to vote before a hearing, but in this case, I — John, I find her amazing. I really do.

As Betsy writes, “clearly having an amazing personal story is only good for Feinstein if the candidate is a liberal”:

Otherwise, she wouldn’t have voted against Miguel Estrada, a Honduran immigrant who had made it on his own in his new country, or Janice Rogers Brown, the daughter of an African American sharecropper. She voted against Samuel Alito, the son of an Italian immigrant. And does anyone doubt that she would have voted against Clarence Thomas if she’d been in the Senate in 1991? No one had a more amazing up from poverty story than Clarence Thomas.

But the story isn’t what matters. I was always uncomfortable with conservatives who acted like Clarence Thomas’s personal story was what qualified him to be on the Supreme Court. If we don’t like the idea of “empathy” being a qualifying trait for the Supreme Court when liberals speak of it, then we shouldn’t be aiming to out-biography them with our nominees. It’s playing the game on their field and we’ll never win, because biography only counts when the nominee is a liberal who has learned the politically correct lessons from having grown up poor.

Meanwhile, at Commentary’s Contentions blog, Jennifer Rubin is blogging a storm on the first day of rubber-stamping hearings for Sotomayor; just keep scrolling. (Unless you’re Lindsey Graham, of course.)

Update: “Video: Wise Latina sends Chris Matthews to leg-thrill heaven.”

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.


Ed Driscoll

Author Photo
Since 2002, News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo!

Archives

Etcetera


Steal This Button!

Subscribe

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

youtube_logo.gif