Here’s a rare harmonic convergence: the liberal Associated Press and conservative L.A. talker John Ziegler agree for possibly the first time ever. As AP puts it: “Letterman threw spitballs from his own glass house.”
Of course, the “spitballs” tossed by a liberal late night host in 2009 means something very different than the relatively benign, centrist humor Johnny Carson served up.
Fortunately, riding to Letterman’s defense (along with the Washington Post’s Tom Shales) is Maureen Dowd, who’s eager to give Letterman a Clintonesque pass, and compares him to the days of Don Draper and Roger Sterling trolling the Sterling-Cooper intern pool. But I thought the point of a fiercely moral show such as Mad Men was that (a) how wrong that is and (b) how far society has come since Boomers such as Dowd made the Long March through Culture, as Roger Kimball would say.
Meanwhile, Roger L. Simon notes that Letterman has comitted another sin — he’s become sclerotic and boring:
My problem with Letterman is this: I don’t find him funny. For all the Letterman writers composing those lists of ten and the fancy guest like the president, etc., I’d much rather watch “Red Eye,” which probably doesn’t have much of a writing staff and so far hasn’t had any administration guests, to my knowledge, but has a much cleverer host and funny sidekicks. Letterman’s predictable comedy (with its pathetic and inaccurate nastiness about other people’s private lives, i. e. Palin) is an indication of how square liberals have become. Greg Gutfeld, the putative conservative, is considerably more hip – and more decent.
Which may explain why that late night show is cleaning up with a key TV demographic.
Finally, John Nolte spots “The Oprahfication of David Letterman” — and sentimentality ill-becomes the man who practically invented television irony a quarter of a century ago.





PJM Home





Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.