November 9th, 2009 12:46 pm

The Desire Named Streetcar

Great post on the silliness of light rail by Diane Medved, wife of the Seattle-based talk radio host:

Everyone knows that light rail is a financial disaster. I can’t find any instance where publicly funded rail lines have made a profit. Rather, they serve a political agenda–to eliminate private autos and ultimately, independent travel. It’s part of a larger worldview that promotes leveling the field–eraticating differences between people based on wealth and achievement.  Often camouflaged as an effort to promote environmental causes, the crusade against cars and for mass transit really seeks to quash anything that differentiates and individualizes people and their choices.

I can understand that classic subways, like Manhattan’s or Paris’ are necessary–they serve cities built before cars, urban sprawl and suburbs.  But west-coast towns, like L.A., San Francisco and Seattle burgeoned because of the automobile; trying to reconfigure these cities to light rail is like trying to cram toothpaste back in the tube.

I certainly enjoyed my jaunt today on Seattle’s downtown “tube.” It was cheaper and lengthier than a ride at Disneyland.  Unfortuntately for taxpayers, like the attractions at the Magic Kingdom, Link light rail is also built on fantasy.  No one wants to give up his car to take four times longer and pay perhaps double or triple, with much greater inconvenience.  Even friends who, in principle, support light rail admit they don’t use it.  Every time I drive by the Othello Station on Rainier Avenue, which I do often, I search the station for activity. Usually there’s no one, either walking near the station or on the trains. Once I saw an orange-vested maintenance man.

Seattle just elected Mike McGinn its new mayor, by a super-thin margin.  His primary promise is to expand light rail; he worked to block new suburban roads. He’s a Sierra Club officer and rides his bike to work.  Though he’ll rationalize Link’s poor performance and lack of customers, sanity may still prevail.  Given the cost over-runs and delays inherent in building light rail (Central Link is the most expensive such project in the nation, ever), he’ll long be out of office before the next segment can break ground.

For more on “The Desire Named Streetcar”, click here.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

3 Comments

1. Whitehall:

Here in Silicon Valley, we were sold a light rail system. No one rides it except the few who live in the low income apartments built near the stations.

Worst, the whole mass transit system here (Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority) gets only 10 cents revenue for each dollar expenditure. Tha balance is from property taxes and other subsidies.

So buy a ticket for a one way express fare of $4 and the the taxpayers are chipping in $36.

Why not just call a cab?

Nov 9, 2009 - 1:29 pm 2. John:

The Washington Orange line along the I-66 median is basically how modern rail has to be built, but at the same time, any rail system nowadays can’t be successful if it’s built with the idea that everyone wants to go downtown.

You can find early NYC subway pictures of the end of the line in the early 20th Century looking like someplace 50 miles out in the country, so the development pre-WW II followed the rail lines. Now the development has grown along the Interstates into and the loops around the city, and in many cases, commercial business have built up on those loops so that people don’t want to go downtown, they want to go from one outer area to another.

That means the feeder roads also have been developed to get large amounts of people to and from those main highways, and that’s where the stations (and the parking garages) have to be, and the lines have to link for transfers in places besides the central city hub. Mass transit systems that force you to go downtown and then back out again to get from one outer area development to another isn’t going to have many takers.

Nov 9, 2009 - 2:36 pm 3. aclay1:

San Francisco is so backwards it thinks that putting fewer parking spaces into new condo developments will ease congestion and force people on to public transportation. All it does is make it harder to find a parking space.

Nov 11, 2009 - 10:28 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments:
 

Ed Driscoll

Author Photo
Since 2002, News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo!

Archives

Etcetera


Steal This Button!

Subscribe

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

youtube_logo.gif