Comments on: Pretzel Logic http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/11/27/pretzel-logic/ Since 2002, News, Technology and Pop Culture, 24 Hours a Day, Live and in Stereo! Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:18:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Rick Caird http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/11/27/pretzel-logic/#comment-11636 Rick Caird Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:41:09 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/?p=25824#comment-11636 When the lovely and talented Andrew says: "They are different because they assert things that are demonstrably, empirically untrue", does that not really apply to Andrew and his whole derangement syndrome? Rick When the lovely and talented Andrew says: “They are different because they assert things that are demonstrably, empirically untrue”, does that not really apply to Andrew and his whole derangement syndrome?

Rick

]]> By: smitty http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/11/27/pretzel-logic/#comment-11632 smitty Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:19:39 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/?p=25824#comment-11632 Maybe <a href="http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/11/paging-dr-helen.html" rel="nofollow">Dr. Helen</a> should opine. Maybe Dr. Helen should opine.

]]> By: syn http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/11/27/pretzel-logic/#comment-11626 syn Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:46:44 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/?p=25824#comment-11626 For a devout Catholic, why is Andrew Sullivan performing bizarre Crucifixion-like fervor against the Madonna and Child. Perhaps the Pope might try having a Catholic conversation with devout Catholic Andrew Sullivan before Sully completely turns the Catholic Church and the Pope into useless joke. What is the taste when sharing the communal body of Christ with those Catholics obsessed with crucifying Mother and Child? It must be a nasty flavor. For a devout Catholic, why is Andrew Sullivan performing bizarre Crucifixion-like fervor against the Madonna and Child.

Perhaps the Pope might try having a Catholic conversation with devout Catholic Andrew Sullivan before Sully completely turns the Catholic Church and the Pope into useless joke.

What is the taste when sharing the communal body of Christ with those Catholics obsessed with crucifying
Mother and Child?

It must be a nasty flavor.

]]> By: tehag http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/11/27/pretzel-logic/#comment-11623 tehag Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:24:47 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/?p=25824#comment-11623 And to think The Atlantic was once respectable. Everyone associated with them is tarnished. And to think The Atlantic was once respectable. Everyone associated with them is tarnished.

]]> By: David Thomson http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/11/27/pretzel-logic/#comment-11621 David Thomson Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:24:03 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/?p=25824#comment-11621 "What is this strange hold Andrew Sullivan has over the right blogosphere?" Andrew Sullivan should be normally ignored simply because he rarely has any anything intelligent to say. The guy is something of a jerk. But this wasn’t always true. Roughly six years ago Sullivan was one of our most insightful bloggers. He is living off his past reputation. “What is this strange hold Andrew Sullivan has over the right blogosphere?”

Andrew Sullivan should be normally ignored simply because he rarely has any anything intelligent to say. The guy is something of a jerk. But this wasn’t always true. Roughly six years ago Sullivan was one of our most insightful bloggers. He is living off his past reputation.

]]> By: K http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/2009/11/27/pretzel-logic/#comment-11618 K Sat, 28 Nov 2009 06:05:35 +0000 http://pajamasmedia.com/eddriscoll/?p=25824#comment-11618 What is this strange hold Andrew Sullivan has over the right blogosphere? He's a prat. A literate prat, but a prat just the same. Why keep quoting him? Is it some sort of reciprocity? He's obsessed with Palin, thereby giving her mounds of coverage but only while the right blogs do the same for him? What is this strange hold Andrew Sullivan has over the right blogosphere? He’s a prat. A literate prat, but a prat just the same. Why keep quoting him? Is it some sort of reciprocity? He’s obsessed with Palin, thereby giving her mounds of coverage but only while the right blogs do the same for him?

]]>