In 1995 Ibn Warraq published the international bestseller %%AMAZON=0879759844 Why I Am Not a Muslim%%. The book has been translated into several languages and was written in response to the Rushdie affair, Ayatollah Khomeini’s fatwa in February 1989 on Salman Rushdie and the ensuing riots, assassinations and debate. Yesterday I asked Ibn Warraq to share his thoughts with Pajamas Media on the knighting of Salman Rushdie. Here is his comment:
SIR SALMAN RUSHDIE
“I was delighted when I heard of Salman Rushdie’s knighthood, but quite clearly thousands of Muslims around the world, who took to the streets burning effigies of the writer, were not. Various fanatical groups such as the Organization to Commemorate Martyrs of the Muslim World offered rewards for Rushdie’s assassination.
“Could and should the British government have foreseen the reactions? There was immediate speculation as to the motives for bestowing this honour on a writer hated in the Islamic world as an apostate and blasphemer. Rushdie has acquired enough literary awards and prizes–the Booker of Bookers prize, the Whitbread novel award (twice), the James Tait Black memorial prize–to justify the knighthood on purely literary merits, and yet one wonders if there was not after all an extra-literary reason for the decision. One could see the knighthood as a magnificent gesture signaling Britain’s determination to abide by its values and traditions–the tradition of free speech, the tradition of reverence for its artists. The riots and reactions in Pakistan and Iran certainly underline the enormous gap in the worldviews of the West and the Rest. We should, in the West, celebrate the knighthood as a grand defiant statement, and drink to Sir Salman.”


Digg This
del.icio.us

PJM Home





5 Comments
1. JKRibera:Ibn Warraq is consistently brave. What a man!
And thanks to PJM for a Flemming Rose blog. Bookmarked.
Jun 20, 2007 - 7:15 pm 2. The Foreigner:I, too, thought the knighthood was evidence that Britain thought free speech was worth a damn.
(As in, worth the damnation of some pretty ugly people.)
I may have been mistaken. From the Jun 20th edition of The Guardian:
The committee that recommended Salman Rushdie for a knighthood did not discuss any possible political ramifications and never imagined that the award would provoke the furious response that it has done in parts of the Muslim world, the Guardian has learnt.
It also emerged yesterday that the writers’ organisation that led the lobbying for the author of Midnight’s Children and The Satanic Verses to be knighted had originally hoped that the honour would lead to better relations between Britain and Asia.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/pakistan/Story/0,,2106965,00.html
Unbelieveable!
Jun 21, 2007 - 5:34 am 3. bour3:Here’s to Sir Salman.
*raises glass*
Jun 21, 2007 - 7:38 am 4. gringoman:*clink*
No doubt about it: The Left may want to forget, but this is a Knight to remember. It’s also enough to get an American to “Hail, Britannia!”
Jun 22, 2007 - 3:29 am 5. JohnSobieski:Well I read the Satanic Verses and was not impressed. Tedious in a word.
I don’t understand why he was nominated. Rushdie puts down the West, why is that worthy of the Queen’s beknighting?
In any case, it may be good in that the Muslims’ rage will make England finally look at what their appeasement has wrought.
Grow a spine England. jeez…
Jun 22, 2007 - 9:31 am