Tonight Bloody Cartoons will be shown on Danish TV. The movie is part of the Why Democracy? project that has been launched to make 10 documentaries from around the world.
It involves 35 broadcasters worldwide and a global web presence. Bloody Cartoons was made by Danish filmmaker and journalist Karsten Kjaer. It’s a great documentary, though it doesn’t tell the story behind the publication of the cartoons; the fact that they didn’t come put of the blue, but were commissioned and published as a reaction to widening self censorship in Denmark and Western Europe regarding the coverage of Islam.
The documentary very effectively shows that the outburst of violent reactions in the Muslim world was a well planned operation by Islamic clerics and political leaders in the Middle East. Few of the angry people had actually seen the cartoons.
Phillippe Val, editor of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, that was put on trial for republishing two of the cartoons marvels at the fact that anyone may perceive the cartoon of the prophet with a bomb in his turban as a provocation.
”Is it a provocation to ridicule people bombing trains? No, if we cannot ridicule them, we have lost. This kind of ridicule represents the mental well being of our citizens,” says Philippe Val.
Well said.
Bloody Cartoons talks to the global mufti and TV-imam Yussuf al-Qaradawi who back in February 2006 called for a ”day of rage” against Denmark. The old man reveals that in the documentary he sees the cartoons for the first time. He is not happy with the interview and demands that the reporter signs a letter confirming that al-Qaradawi’s words will be translated properly. The secretary general of the Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC) Ekmeliddin Ihsamoglu isn’t happy either, that he is being confronted with the fact that he bears some responsibility for the violence.
He insists that this part of the interview be left out. Obviously, it isn’t easy for these people in powerful positions to answer critical questions. They are not used to this kind of speech. Free speech
The scoop of the movie is an interview with a professionel demonstrater in Iran. This 72-year old man is instructing the Basij forces of the revolutionary guard to attack the Danish embassy. Reporter Karsten Kjaer finds him in a town outside Teheran, and contrary to all the official figures the guy is honest.
”We heard that the Prophet had been insulted, so in a letter to the Danish ambassador we demanded that the Danish government punish the offenders and apologize,” he explains.
“But did you see the cartoons?”
“No, I did not.”
When he is presented with the cartoon showing Mohammed with a bomb in his turban he replies.
”Is this Mohammed? He doesn’t look like the prophet. He is an Indian Sikh.”
Oh, that’s really insulting.
Watch out for November 11. That’s the day Bloody Cartoons will be broadcasted on Al Arabiya. It’s going to very interesting to follow reactions in the Middle East.
Digg This
del.icio.us
PJM Home
2 Comments
Jon Herstad:A very good documentary though you could argue that it lacks some background since the mere premise of the whole incident—self censorship—is taken out. But I actually think that letting the preamble out is serving a purpose it narrows the scope so that the difference between Islamists fundamentalists and democratic values are crystal clear; thus emphasizing the core point of the piece.
What saddens me most from the whole Muhammad cartoons controversy is actually the fact the British and (especially) American news-outlets failed to show the cartoons BIG TIME. For those of us who follow US media in general knows all to well that CNN, FOX, WSJ, NYT etc. has no problems showing demeaning drawings of a vast variety of groups and religions if it is appropriate and/or necessary for a certain story, but for some reason non of them thought these drawings where appropriate nor necessary to show—most of them coming with a lame excuse that their viewers/readers could see them online—which in my opinion will be a shame on those news-outlet fore a long time.
You Flemming Rose will on the other hand always have my fullest respect!
Oct 8, 2007 - 1:26 am Marko Ajdaric:It does NOT tell the story behind ‘the publication of the cartoons’????
Oct 10, 2007 - 10:11 pmMaybe because that should be dangerous. You can lie many occidentals for almost all their lives. But donot think everyone is blind. It is as clear as the sy that the new was REISSUED many times, with a difference of WEEKS in different European countries, UNTIL the ‘cartoons’ were ‘discovered’. Who the occidentals, that change their minds every 3 weeks thinh they are to judge other people?