December 22, 2008
HOLDING RESCUERS liable for injuries. Plus, Why Ohio is better than California. It’s worth noting, of course, that liability for rescuers’ torts is a common-law tradition, along with the lack of any duty to rescue.
HOLDING RESCUERS liable for injuries. Plus, Why Ohio is better than California. It’s worth noting, of course, that liability for rescuers’ torts is a common-law tradition, along with the lack of any duty to rescue.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds at 7:47 am
InstaPundit Store!
Unfair Doctrine
Deceiver.com
Books For Kids Blog
Cherries Divine
PostGlobal
Pajamas Media
GlennReynolds.com
My TCS columns
Air Congress
Albion's Seedlings
Arms and the Law
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
Chequer-Board
Cliopatria
DP Review.com
Dr. Helen
Mike Godwin
Personal Effects
Six: The Movie
Steve's Digicams
StrategyPage
WiFi Net News
Yahoo! Blog Directory
Ask me about my BlogChildren!
