In response to a question asking Democratic Party delegates whether they felt George W. Bush was legitimately elected in 2000, fully 91% of respondents said he wasn’t. The poll also noted the response rate of self-identified Dems overall, 78% of whom thought Bush’s 2000 election was illegitimate (question 56).
Just for perspective.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Feb 05, 2010 at 7:08 am Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 26, 2010 at 6:59 am Link Comments Off.
CHANGE: December home sales down nearly 17 percent: Home sales plunge nearly 17 percent in December after tax credit deadline extended. “Sales of previously occupied homes took the largest monthly drop in more than 40 years last month, sinking more dramatically than expected after lawmakers gave buyers additional time to use a tax credit.” More dramatically than expected, eh? That keeps happening . . . . Plus this: “Many experts project home prices, which started to rise last summer, will fall again over the winter. That’s because foreclosures make up a larger proportion of sales during the winter months, when fewer sellers choose to put their homes on the market.”
UPDATE: Bill Gates Says Recovery Will Take Years: “Although there have been signs of economic improvement in recent months, as well as a collective sense of optimism in the IT industry that spending could rebound this year, there’s little concrete evidence to indicate that this is anything more than wishful thinking. And if unemployment remains high, the dreaded ‘S’ word — stagflation — could begin to creep into discussions about the economy. Gates said even when the economy does improve the government will have to institute systemic changes in order for any real rebound to take root. “The budget’s very, very out of balance and even as the economy comes back, without changes in tax and entitlement policies, it won’t get back into balance.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 25, 2010 at 2:54 pm Link Comments Off.
AN UPDATE ON THE “ELLIE LIGHT” ASTROTURFING STORY: Patterico notes that we’ve actually seen two types of astroturfing:
Donald Trump Astroturfing: A letter published in multiple places from one person claiming to live in multiple cities. Ellie Light was the quintessential Donald Trump Astroturfer. In fact, her real estate holdings would put Trump to shame. She published the very same pro-Obama letter in 65 publications — including 31 states, and the District of Columbia. It also appeared in 3 national publications and a Yahoo link — and in 2 foreign publications, including a publication in Bangkok, Thailand.
And she claimed to live in almost all of these locations. Because that claim enhanced her ability to place her letters. So she claimed to live in Philadelphia, PA; and Daly City, California; and Mansfield, Ohio; and Waynesboro, Virginia; and Algoma, Wisconsin; and Bangor, Maine — and dozens of other places.
Who said Obama supporters were all downtrodden?
Mark Spivey appeared in several places as well. And Ellie Light and Mark Spivey claimed residence in almost every publication to which they sent their letters.
Not even Donald Trump can claim such extensive real estate holdings!
The conclusion is simple: Ellie Light and Mark Spivey are liars. They pretend to be from multiple places to enhance their credibility. In fact, they are from one location — and they are trying to pretend they are individuals from all over America.
But they aren’t. And that leads us to Category #2:
David Axelrod Astroturfing: Identical letters published in multiple places claiming to be from different people
You get suspicious when you see the same letter appearing in multiple locations with multiple names.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Don Surber emails: “As a person who has dealt with letters to the editor 20+ years, the fault is with my counterparts at other newspapers, not Ellie Light. They got burnt. The Cleveland Plain Dealer didn’t. It blew the whistle. And yes, I have been burnt in the past.” Well, she did lie about where she lived. Or else she’s got more houses than John McCain.
And reader Brian Gates emails:
From that Cleveland article on Ellie Light: “I must give the Tea Partiers credit for even knowing who [Power] is,” Light’s e-mail said.
On Wednesday, nobody had ever heard of her; today, she’s the most polite leftist working in the media.
From later in the article: “Just because it is inconvenient for us in the news business to find out who people are doesnt mean it isn’t important anymore,” [University of Missouri journalism professor Tom] Rosenstiel said.
Too bad that doesn’t apply to Presidential candidates too, or this whole thing may never have come up.
Heh. [LATER: First link was bad before. Fixed now. Sorry!]
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 25, 2010 at 8:01 am Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 13, 2010 at 10:51 am Link Comments Off.
A NEW ANTI-PIRATE SHIP: the U.S.S. Independence. I have to say, I never really thought I’d be writing about “new anti-pirate ships” in the 21st Century. . . .
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 12, 2010 at 6:15 am Link Comments Off.
While climate delegates are quarreling in Copenhagen, and President Barack Obama is collecting his Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, an important story is unfolding in relative obscurity, in North Korea. Furious over a confiscatory currency “reform,” citizens of the world’s most repressive state have begun publicly criticizing their government.
It is hard to overstate just how bold a move that is.
Indeed.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Dec 10, 2009 at 10:53 am Link Comments Off.
YEAH, I ALREADY POSTED ON THIS BUT I’M GOING TO DO IT AGAIN: Copenhagen climate summit: 1,200 limos, 140 private planes and caviar wedges. If they were really worried about global warming they’d be doing this by Skype. But they live in a culture of entitlement. Energy conservation and carbon limits, like taxes, are for the little people.
Related: From ClimateGate to Carbonhagen. “For the delegates to the Copenhagen Climate Change summit, inconvenient truths abound. Not the least of which is the prediction that attendees will generate a carbon footprint equal to all of 2006 for Morocco.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Dec 07, 2009 at 2:01 pm Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Dec 06, 2009 at 1:57 pm Link Comments Off.
UTAH TEA PARTY ORGANIZER DAVID KIRKHAM WRITES:
These 4 pictures should strike more fear into the heart of a politician than any rockous town hall meeting, call, letter, or Tea Party. 24 hours ago we put out the word we needed 13 volunteers to be “Legislative Captains,” (one for each of the 13 state legislators we have here in Utah county). The Legislative Captains would work in their respective legislative districts to recruit delegates for the convention. We sent about 50 very targeted invites to people based on their address. We gathered the names from our Tea Party sign up sheets. 20 people showed up. So, with the extra people, we asked what expertise everyone had. We then divided up duties on Facebook, events, marketing, and a new website, www.utah912teaparty.com. On the whiteboard “POP” stands for Precinct Operation Program. Just say NO to RINOS.
Here’s one of the pics. Cool setting!
UPDATE: A reader emails: “I like it: Garage-band politics.” Heh. But that’s no ordinary garage.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Dec 05, 2009 at 8:02 am Link Comments Off.
A CLIMATEGATE UPDATE. “Phil Jones tried to hush my paper. SUNY Albany won’t discuss the investigation my paper initiated. And QUB ignored my three FOI requests for their data.”
And Rand Simberg says call it Climaquiddick. “In other words, expect the media to try to whitewash and minimize it.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Nov 25, 2009 at 8:39 am Link Comments Off.
A TEA PARTY PROTEST IN SALT LAKE CITY: Reader David Kirkham emails:
Saturday we had the most important Tea Party in Utah to date! We have a delegate system here in Utah. If a candidate wins 60% of the delegate votes at the convention they become the party nominee and there is NO PRIMARY election–the winner immediately advances to the general election. This delegate process levels the playing field and allows for challengers with relative little money to take on an entrenched incumbent like Senator Bennett.
We (Tea Party and 912ers) decided it was time to put down our protest signs and start to organize for the convention. Notice there are no signs in the pictures. This was strictly business. We got all our email lists together and put out a call to action for a Tea Party/912 event to train people how to become delegates. During the event, I asked how many people were currently delegates…no more than 8-10 people raised their hands. There were all NEW people to the political process.
We had the Utah State Capitol people (GREAT guys) set up 500 chairs and it was standing room only. There must have been 600 people at the event–they all drove through a snow storm to be there. Everyone one of them wants to be a delegate. There are only 3,300 delegates in the state. We gathered names and emails and are currently breaking them down into the precincts. We are setting up precinct captains for further training mobilization. A State Representative told me he simply could not believe the turn out. The most telling comment of the day came from another State Representative, “Bennett’s toast.”
No media–oh well. We’ll do it without them.
I guess I’m a community organizer now LOL.
Those are springing up everywhere lately. Pic below.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Nov 15, 2009 at 10:33 pm Link Comments Off.
But Mickey Kaus wonders if it’s all trumped-up. I think, though, that the reason they’re not bothering to distinguish between H1N1 and seasonal flu is that at the moment, there isn’t really any seasonal flu yet. If it’s flu, it’s swine flu.
And more skepticism from Michael Fumento. Plus, several readers think this is a case of Rahm “never let a crisis go to waste” Emanuel at work — declare a health crisis and it makes national health care look somehow more urgent. But while I discount the “Swine Flu Vaccine Is Obama’s Katrina” talk, their handling so far isn’t something I’d put forward as an actual argument for more government involvement in health-care delivery.
More here, including the full text of Obama’s order.
Richard Warman, the hate speech complainant who is personally responsible for all but two section 13 censorship prosecutions this decade, is now being investigated by the Canadian Human Rights Commission for hate speech himself.
I know. It sounds crazy. Just like it sounded crazy when it was revealed that Warman and the CHRC were members of neo-Nazi organizations.
Warman is a former CHRC investigator himself; and even after he left the CHRC they continued to pay his expenses to file and prosecute complaint after complaint. All this, despite the fact he’s been under investigation for hate speech for three years.
At the same time as Warman was a complainant, he was a defendant.
At the same time as the CHRC was cutting him cheques to cover his expenses, they were probing his conduct.
At the same time as he held himself out to be an anti-hate crimes activist, his own hateful speech was being probed.
Sounds like they’re running a topflight organization, there . . . .
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Sep 24, 2009 at 9:38 am Link Comments Off.
HMM: Ethics Panel Investigates Waters, Graves and Jackson. Interesting extra bit about Jesse Jackson, Jr. “A statement issued by the ethics committee said each of the investigations is ongoing, but the panel will defer its efforts in Jackson’s case in light of an ongoing Justice Department inquiry.” Hmm. What could Justice be looking at?
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Sep 16, 2009 at 12:36 pm Link Comments Off.
READER JODY GREEN WRITES: “We went to the protest in Washington and we walked up and down Pennsylvania Avenue during the march. We saw thousands of signs and 99% were hand made and unique. The one person we saw handing out signs was handing out the pre-printed ‘Bury Obama Care with Kennedy’ sign. He had hundreds of them in packages and was handing them to everyone that passed by. I did not take one because I thought it not a very effective sign and would probably only cause negative coverage. Well that is what it has caused. There have been numerous stories from some big names saying how this was offensive. Rush had a montage today of reporters talking about this sign. I even heard it on a local radio station as top of the hour straight news. Just curious if any of your other readers saw what I saw and maybe learned where this guy came from. I guess I smell a rat.”
Anybody else know anything about this?
UPDATE: Reader Luis Hess writes:
The American Life League is responsible for the “Bury Obamacare with Kennedy” sign: http://americanlifeleague.stores.yahoo.net/index.html
What’s strange is that this sign stands far apart from all their other Pro-Life memorabilia. The Pro-Life movement has nothing to do with Obama or Kennedy insofar as it comes to universal health care (outside of the abortion issue). According to the BBB (http://www.bbb.org/charity-reviews/national/toc/american-life-league-in-stafford-va-2294), the organization has only existed since July 2009. Something smells strange about the entire set-up.
Hmm.
MORE: Hiawatha Bray writes: ‘It’s a real pro-life organization that’s been around since 1979. And Brian Gates writes: “I’m not sure where Mr Hess is getting his information, but here is a 4th Circuit record of a case the American Life League was involved in in 1995.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Sep 14, 2009 at 7:52 pm Link Comments Off.
CHARLES COOPER: “Again, if this discussion becomes a question of ‘who lied,’ then the Democrats lose. Healthcare reform is their big enchilada. The administration can’t afford to get caught up in a game of liar liar, pants on fire. Been there, done that – thrice so far in 2009. Remember the Henry Louis Gates flap in July?”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Sep 10, 2009 at 9:22 pm Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Aug 17, 2009 at 8:48 am Link Comments Off.
DRAWING A CONTRAST BETWEEN BOB DYLAN AND SKIP GATES. On the other hand, there’s this: “I find it pretty depressing. There was a time when we condescendingly used the term ‘your papers, please’ to distinguish ourselves from Eastern Block countries and other authoritarian states. Post-Hiibel, America has become a place where a harmless, 68-year-old man out on a stroll can be stopped, interrogated, detained, and forced to produce proof of identification to state authorities, despite having committed no crime. I guess I just don’t see the punchline.” Nope, but there’s a Ray Bradbury story reference. . . .
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Aug 16, 2009 at 6:07 pm Link Comments Off.
I WONDER IF HE’LL SAY THAT THE SEIU ACTED “STUPIDLY” in sending thugs who beat up Ken Gladney? Obama to enter town hall fray. I predict more nuance. It’s not like this was Skip Gates. Funny how the story leaves that beating out while playing up some non-issue “incidents with firearms.” Not up to The Hill’s usual standard — seems like a lot of the stuff comes straight from a ThinkProgress press release. Which is a dangerous source of information.
UPDATE: I dropped an email to The HIll’s online editor, Bridget Johnson, and got this reply: “Your point is very valid, Glenn. I’ve just had a talk with staff on the need to carefully balance coverage on this issue. Thanks for sharing your concerns.”
Thanks for listening to them!
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Aug 11, 2009 at 9:40 am Link Comments Off.
WELL, HE WOULDN’T NEED HEALTH INSURANCE if SEIU thugs hadn’t beaten him up. It takes chutzpah to try to turn him into a poster child for ObamaCare. This is close to killing your parents and asking for mercy as an orphan . . . .
UPDATE: By the way, Gateway Pundit is Gladney Central these days.
ANOTHER UPDATE: “Never mind!” Reader Joe O’Rourke writes:
At the bottom of the thinkprogress article, it mentions an update that, in fact, Gladney is insured.
Of course, they left this update at the very bottom instead of mentioning it at the top. It sorta negates the article’s premise….
An army of Emily Litellas. Really, you couldn’t make this kind of thing up. Well, you could, but thanks to ThinkProgress and the Obamacare gang that can’t shoot straight, you don’t have to.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Aug 11, 2009 at 8:29 am Link Comments Off.
For a graphic illustration of the difference between real and contrived protests, see this. Meanwhile, how’s all that “post-partisan” hope-and-change talk going to play into a strategy to call your opponents dumb rednecks who are pawns of Satan insurance companies? Can they do this without hurting their own credibility?
UPDATE: Poll: Obama mishandled comments on race. “The president’s approval ratings fell, especially among working-class whites, as the focus of the Gates story shifted from details about the incident to Obama’s remarks, the poll said. Among whites in general, more disapprove than approve of his comments by a two-to-one margin.”
ANOTHER UPDATE: If only it had worked out this way. Instead, from the video, the get-together looked rather strained.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 30, 2009 at 9:29 pm Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 30, 2009 at 9:20 pm Link Comments Off.
THE AUDACITY OF HOPS: “The president, we are told, will be drinking Bud Light, Crowley will have Blue Moon, and Gates will have Red Stripe — Red Light and Blue.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 30, 2009 at 10:38 am Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 27, 2009 at 1:00 pm Link Comments Off.
TUNKU VARADARAJAN: The Professor, the Cop, and the President. “This episode, for all its sordidness, confirms the greatness of America. Where else could a humble cop–a Lilliput of a sergeant–stand up so publicly to a president? And not just stand up but invite himself over for a beer with the president? What theater it has been, what entertainment. And yes, a teachable moment–for Professor Gates, and for President Barack Obama. Sgt. Crowley may believe that he had nothing to learn, but I’m certain he has grasped a small truth or two as well.”
UPDATE: Radley Balko: It’s not about race, but about police abuses of power. “The power to forcibly detain a citizen is an extraordinary one. It’s taken far too lightly, and is too often abused. And that abuse certainly occurs against black people, but not only against black people. American cops seem to have increasingly little tolerance for people who talk back, even merely to inquire about their rights. . . . If there’s a teachable moment to extract from Gates’ arrest, it’s that arrest powers should be limited to actual crimes. Instead, the emerging lesson seems to be that you should capitulate to police, all the time, right or wrong. That’s unfortunate, because there are plenty of instances where you shouldn’t. . . . Police officers deserve the same courtesy we afford anyone else we encounter in public life—basic respect and civility. If they’re investigating a crime, they deserve cooperation as required by law, and beyond that only to the extent to which the person with whom they’re speaking is comfortable. Verbally disrespecting a cop may well be rude, but in a free society we can’t allow it to become a crime, any more than we can criminalize criticism of the president, a senator, or the city council.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 27, 2009 at 10:50 am Link Comments Off.
PROF. JACOBSON ON CROWLEY, GATES, AND OBAMA: We Need The Truth, Not Beer And Apologies. “The best evidence as to the truth will be the recordings of the 911 call which precipitated the police going to Prof. Gates’ house, Sgt. Crowley’s radio calls once on the scene, and the accounts of eyewitnesses, including neighbors, passers-by, and the two other policemen on the scene.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 26, 2009 at 11:38 pm Link Comments Off.
TOM MAGUIRE: MOVE ON? “If the Cambridge Police Dept had besmirched my behavior and deportment by telling people I was ‘tumultuous’ and acting strangely, I would demand the release of the dispatcher tapes to blow away their lies.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 26, 2009 at 11:29 pm Link Comments Off.
GLENN LOURY: Obama, Gates and the American Black Man. “The Gates arrest is a made-for-cable-TV tempest in a teapot. It is the rough equivalent of a black man being thrown out of a restaurant after having berated an indifferent maître d’ for showing him to a table by the kitchen door, all the while declaring what everybody is supposed to know: this is what happens to a black man in America. . . . It is depressing in the extreme that the president, when it came time for him to expend political capital on the issue of race and the police, did so on behalf of his ‘friend’ rather than stressing policy reforms that might keep the poorly educated, infrequently employed, troubled but still human young black men in America out of prison.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 26, 2009 at 5:25 pm Link Comments Off.
MARK STEYN: He Said / VIP Said. “Professor Gates is now saying that, if Sergeant Crowley publicly apologizes for his racism, the prof will graciously agree to ‘educate him about the history of racism in America.’ Which is a helluva deal. I mean, Ivy League parents re-mortgage their homes to pay Gates for the privilege of lecturing their kids, and here he is offering to hector it away to some no-name lunkhead for free.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 26, 2009 at 2:44 pm Link Comments Off.
CHICAGO’S MAYOR DALEY WEIGHS IN ON GATES CONTROVERSY: “President Obama should have gathered the facts first before commenting on Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.’s encounter with Cambridge, Mass. police, Mayor Daley said Saturday, wading into the controversy.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 26, 2009 at 8:51 am Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 24, 2009 at 11:56 pm Link Comments Off.
ROGER SIMON: Gates, and Obama’s nostalgia for racism. “The problem is that this nostalgia not only blames people unfairly, it also increases the very thing it pretends to oppose – racism itself. The unfair or inaccurate imputation of racism promotes racism.” Of course, that increases the power of people who trade on charges of racism . . . .
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 24, 2009 at 11:14 pm Link Comments Off.
“I COULD HAVE CALIBRATED THOSE WORDS DIFFERENTLY.” AN OBAMA SORT-OF APOLOGY to Sergeant Crowley.
And Tom Maguire is cutting no slack: “With two wars and a faltering health care reform effort, maybe President Stupidly should not be bloviating about local police matters, especially when he does not have the facts.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 24, 2009 at 1:23 pm Link Comments Off.
Plus this: “And now we know the name of the woman who called the police. I suppose her life will be ruined now, as she’ll be portrayed as a racist. Lesson learned: If you think you’re witnessing a crime, mind your own business. Somewhere, the new Kitty Genovese walks into the alleyway.”
Plus, Alan Bock: Did the Cambridge Police Act Stupidly? My take: Bad arrest, but not motivated by racism. The issue was likely “mouthing off” — not a crime, but a frequent cause of disorderly-conduct arrests without regard to race. It was just that Gates had the resources to make it a big national story.
Perhaps, as we view this confrontation between an Harvard Prof who’s a friend of the President and a Cambridge cop, we can also have a national conversation about class?
Have you seen the police report on The Smoking Gun? In it, three things jumped out at me that I haven’t seen reported in any of the coverage I’ve read on the incident:
First, according to Crowley’s writeup, before providing his ID Gates made a call in which he asked someone to “get the chief”. How many people can make a phone call in the sincere expectation that they’ll be able to immediately reach the chief of police, whether Cambridge PD or Harvard’s campus police?
Second, Crowley felt it appropriate to request the presence of the Harvard CPs to help him handle the situation. Would he have done that if Gates had been a Harvard student? When I was at MIT in the late 80s and early 90s, when the Boston police visited us, they certainly didn’t summon the MIT CPs (although we would, if there was a real problem, because the MIT CPs were very much on our side).
Third, Harvard sent someone from the University maintenance department over to secure Gates’ house and/or fix the broken lock on his front
door. How many people have an employer who’ll send maintenance staff over to fix up or watch over their house?
Not me.
And reader Joe Scuderi writes: “If Obama wants to speak out for a Black man who is getting a raw deal, how about this one?” Apparently that’s left to me and Radley Balko.
MORE STILL: On that “national conversation,” a reader emails: “I think you mean ‘class’ in both senses of the word.”
And some thoughts from Victor Davis Hanson. “The Gates incident seems to have had little to do with race but a lot to do with the natural human misunderstandings that happen every day in police scenes — and its final twist has everything to do with insider privilege and aristocratic disdain.”
And apparently, even being one of the diversity police doesn’t get you a pass on those . . . .
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 23, 2009 at 6:46 pm Link Comments Off.
DAN RIEHL accuses Obama of premature opining on the Gates case. “As the occupant of the WH, Obama has a responsibility to speak for all Americans. He appears to be showing a pattern of not doing that, but seeing everything through a lens of racial politics, first. It is as unfortunate as it is dumb.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 13, 2009 at 5:09 pm Link Comments Off.
STIMULUS! Victor Davis Hanson on The War Against The Producers. “Ponder a simple fact: The Obama administration is dispersing income lavishly to those who do not pay taxes and it will have to be paid for by those who do. For all the talk of that awful percentile who make over $200,000, this administration has not distinguished the hyper-rich 1% that make untold money (e.g., the Buffets, Soroses, Turners, Gateses, Kerrys, Gores, etc), from the much more demonized, larger 5% of the population whose income does not come from investments and insider influence and deal-making, but rather from providing more tangible goods and services–the family doctor, the plumbing contractor, the small lumber company owner, the car dealer, the local family-held insurance company, the airline pilot, the car-leasing firm, the patent attorney, etc.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 12, 2009 at 4:23 pm Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jul 03, 2009 at 10:43 pm Link Comments Off.
WELL, GOOD: Gates: US puts more missile defense around Hawaii. “Gates told reporters at the Pentagon he has sent the military’s ground-based mobile missile system to Hawaii, and positioned a radar system nearby. Together the systems theoretically could detect and shoot down a North Korean missile if it came to that.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jun 18, 2009 at 6:24 pm Link Comments Off.
President Barack Obama says he has lost confidence in the inspector general who investigates AmeriCorps and other national service programs and has told Congress he is removing him from the position.
Obama’s move follows an investigation by IG Gerald Walpin of Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, who is an Obama supporter and former NBA basketball star, into the misuse of federal grants by a nonprofit education group that Johnson headed. . . . The IG found that Johnson, a former all-star point guard for the Phoenix Suns, had used AmeriCorps grants to pay volunteers to engage in school-board political activities, run personal errands for Johnson and even wash his car.
I’ve been trying to discover the real reason for Obama’s move, and it’s still not clear. I’m told that it could be a combination of the normal tensions that surround any inspector general’s office, or the president’s desire to get his own people in IG positions, or a dispute over a particular investigation. “Bottom line,” one source wrote, “getting rid of a tough, Republican-appointed IG who has been aggressively going after waste and fraud gives Obama a chance to replace that IG with a more compliant team player.”
I’m also told that a number of inspectors general around the government have been expressing concerns to Congress recently about threats to their independence. . . . Bottom line: The AmeriCorps IG accuses prominent Obama supporter of misusing AmeriCorps grant money. Prominent Obama supporter has to pay back more than $400,000 of that grant money. Obama fires AmeriCorps IG.
Under a Republican President, this would be a huge scandal.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jun 12, 2009 at 8:51 am Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jun 04, 2009 at 10:35 pm Link Comments Off.
MICHAEL YON meets Defense Secretary Robert Gates in Singapore. “Secretary Gates has made it clear that we have no intention of rewarding bad behavior, as we have done in the past with North Korea. Many readers seem to hold a special disdain for President Obama, and I actively campaigned for McCain, but I get the feeling that Obama is tougher and proving wiser than many people seem to think. I do not detect that we are slinking away from North Korea. “
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jun 01, 2009 at 10:08 am Link Comments Off.
In his third term in the Senate, Bob Bennett finds himself in unfamiliar and unfriendly waters, roiled by public frustration with Washington and with at least two sharks circling, believing the Republican senator might be vulnerable.
Attorney General Mark Shurtleff is expected to announce his Senate bid today and Tim Bridgewater abandoned his bid for state party chairman last week, saying he heard all over the state that delegates wanted a more conservative choice for senator.
Bennett was a prime target of tax protesters at “Tea Party” rallies last month, who booed the junior senator for supporting a bank bailout last year; conservative state legislators are breaking with Bennett and lining up with his challengers; and Shurtleff’s internal polling shows Bennett might have cause for concern.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on May 13, 2009 at 12:41 pm Link Comments Off.
A VILLAGE CAN’T RAISE A CHILD WITH NUCLEAR ARMS, OR SOMETHING: Obama Breaks With Gates, Cancels Nuke Program. “Obama’s new budget plan includes a little-noted sea change in U.S. nuclear policy, and a step towards his vision of a denuclearized world. It provides no funding for the Reliable Replacement Warhead program, created to design a new generation of long-lasting nuclear weapons that don’t need to be tested. (The military is worried that a nuclear test moratorium in effect since 1992 might endanger the reliability of an aging US arsenal.) But this spring Obama issued a bold call for a world free of nuclear weapons, and part of that vision entails leading by example. . . . Obama’s budget kills the National Nuclear Security Administration program once and for all.”
So, a question: If Obama were trying to wreck America as a superpower, what would he be doing differently?
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on May 12, 2009 at 1:34 pm Link Comments Off.
HMM: US replaces top general in Afghanistan. And not very nicely: “Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he asked for the resignation of Gen. David McKiernan. Gates said new leadership is needed as the Obama administration launches its strategy in the seven-year-old campaign.”
UPDATE: That’s interesting: A 3:22 pm edit took out the line about resignation above. Perhaps that means it was in error. Stay tuned.
On the other hand, this UPI report says he was asked to resign.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on May 11, 2009 at 2:59 pm Link Comments Off.
RAISING BILL GATES: A “headstrong” child, he required correction that a few would probably call abuse today. And he benefited from growing up with a strong father. So what’s happening to this generation’s Bill Gates?
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Apr 26, 2009 at 8:38 pm Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Apr 08, 2009 at 2:29 pm Link Comments Off.
POLITICIZING THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT: Jennifer Rubin investigates. “Under the Bush administration, Sens. Patrick Leahy and Chuck Schumer would be certain to drag the attorney general in front of the cameras and start hammering away at the first hint that he had given insufficient attention to career attorneys’ legal research or neglected legal restrictions on the government’s policy objectives. But now they have zero interest in quizzing the Democratic administration’s top lawyer. Some public pressure might be brought to bear on them, but they are unlikely to be swayed by pleas for them to fulfill their Constitutional obligations. So where are the Republicans?. . . . For now, we are left to ponder whether Holder is serving up just what the administration wants to hear (as was alleged in his role in controversial Clinton-era pardons) or whether he really is the man of integrity his supporters claimed him to be. Right now the available evidence suggests he is a compliant figure uninterested in providing objective legal advice and constitutional discipline for an administration badly in need of both.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Apr 05, 2009 at 2:03 pm Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Mar 29, 2009 at 11:11 pm Link Comments Off.
MORE ORLANDO TEA PARTY PICS HERE: Also, Rachel Pereira has posted over 100 pictures. Note the appearance of John Galt:
Here’s a news report from the event. And reader Freddy Clayton sends this report from Orlando: “I am an enthusiastic reader who has checked in with Instapundit nearly daily for almost six years. I thoroughly enjoy your perceptive comments and your quirky and often witty selection of stories and links, and I have cited you to my two sons often. One of them, Walker, is home for Spring Break from Stanford, where he is a junior. He is a libertarian, and he often finds himself philosophically isolated and lonely in Palo Alto. He and I attended the Orlando Tea Party this afternoon, and I have attached a photo of Walker there. While I am an inveterate issues nerd, always eager to read about and discuss political/economic/social issues, I have not been very active politically, so today was a rare treat for Walker and me. The crowd at the rally was friendly, enthusiastic, and good-natured, and we heard few comments directed towards the President or Congress that were nasty or personally derogatory.” Here’s a picture. And there are plenty of libertarians in Palo Alto, Walker, though you may have to get off campus to meet most of them . . . .
And reader Brian Gates reports from the scene: “Nice crowd. Lots of Reagan fans wearing this or this. There were also quite a few references to John Galt. I’ve been thinking of sending my representative copies of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead. Sure, it’s 1800 pages, but the geniuses in Congress can read a thousand pages overnight….”
Plus, reader Laurie Lane has pics from the Ridgefield, CT protest and reports: “Here are some pix I took of this awesome event of approximately 300 enthusiastic, good humored and very concerned citizens. More pix (taken with my Nikon D300) are in my gallery, link below.” Follow the link to see ‘em. I note another appearance by The Debt Star! It’s everywhere! Reader Patrick Courtney also reports from Ridgefield: “I attended this event today. Beautiful weather, good sized crowd (100 expected, 200-300 in attendance).” Here’s a news report from Ridgefield.
Meanwhile, reader Peter Matthews reports from Lexington, Kentucky: “Here are some pics from the Lexington, KY Tea Party held today from noon to 2pm at the Fayette County Courthouse. At least a thousand in attendance – maybe more.” He sends this picture, among others. And there’s lots more Lexington coverage here — just keep scrolling.
And here’s another from the Raleigh protest, mentioned earlier, from reader David Moore:
What’s most striking about all of these, of course, is that these are people who don’t usually go in for protests.
Well, that and the fact that — unlike the AIG media event — the press doesn’t outnumber the protesters. Heck, it barely shows up at all.
UPDATE: Much more from Michelle Malkin. Her comment: “Maybe if the Tea Party protesters burned the American flag instead of waving it proudly, the AP would send out reporters…” And, of course, all of this is just a warmup for April 15.
ANOTHER UPDATE: More from Ridgefield, via reader Andrew Bunger: “About 200 – 300 people showed up in the historic (and very Democratic) town of Ridgefield, CT. Very polite, well organized, and very much against Dodd. I would guess it is the first protest for about 95% of us (myself included). It takes a lot to get a bunch of conservatives to stand on Main Street and shout slogans at passing cars. We have a way to go before we catch up to the professional protests of the Dems but this was the most encouraging event I have witnessed in the last year. Dodd is sinking fast in CT.”
I like the “Dump Dodd” and “Dodd Man Walking” signs.
MORE: Another Orlando pic, courtesy of reader Jay Stannard:
STILL MORE: Reader Dan Steele writes: “Long time reader, first time commenter. Two things I think worth noting about the photos from the tea parties on Saturday: All of the signs (some made me lol) looked to be homemade by the people who were carrying them, in contrast to the pre-printed signs common at the ANSWER organized hatefests. Also, I couldn’t identify a single uniformed police office in any of the photos. Apparently, fiscal conservatives are better able to exercise their First Amendment rights without shedding their clothes, breaking stuff or lighting things on fire. Let’s HOPE that doesn’t CHANGE.”
MORE STILL: Okay, one more Orlando pic, courtesy of reader David Reid.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Mar 21, 2009 at 9:35 pm Link Comments Off.
That’s $165 million in bonus money handed out to AIG debt manipulators who may be the only ones who know how to defuse the bomb they themselves built. Now, in the scheme of things, $165 million is a rounding error. It amounts to less than 1/18,500 of the $3.1 trillion federal budget. It’s less than one-tenth of 1 percent of the bailout money given to AIG alone. If Bill Gates were to pay these AIG bonuses every year for the next 100 years, he’d still be left with more than half his personal fortune.
For this we are going to poison the well for any further financial rescues, face the prospect of letting AIG go under (which would make the Lehman Brothers collapse look trivial) and risk a run on the entire world financial system? . . . If you thought the AIG hysteria was a display of populist cynicism directed at a relative triviality, consider this: There are more than 6.5 million trucks in the United States. The program Congress terminated allowed 97 Mexican trucks to roam among them. Ninety-seven! Shutting them out not only undermines NAFTA. It caused Mexico to retaliate with tariffs on 90 goods affecting $2.4 billion in U.S. trade coming out of 40 states.
Of course we are. Because to our governing class, polls are more real than reality. And consequences, like taxes, are for the little people.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Mar 20, 2009 at 9:56 am Link Comments Off.
JERRY POURNELLE: “If the Gates Foundation decided to take mankind to space they could permanently end problems caused by shortages of energy and mineral resources. Wealth is generally the answer to many problems, including over-population.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Mar 10, 2009 at 8:48 am Link Comments Off.
UPDATE: Ouch: “That makes … how many appointments to fail in the Greatest Transition Evah?” I’ve lost count. This morning, I forgot Zinni. It’s gotten so you can’t remember all the transition screw-ups without a cheatsheet.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Thomas Prewitt writes: “I am struggling to identify any area in which Obama has demonstrated competence since he became president. Seriously can you name one? Hell, he can’t even speak without using a teleprompter.” Hmm. Ending the medical marijuana raids was a good idea, but that’s not really about competence. Anybody got a suggestion?
MORE: Reader Fred Butzen writes:
Normally, I’d rather damn Obama than praise him. But since you ask, I think he’s shown a degree of competence in managing the war in Iraq. Retaining Gates, and maintaining continuity with the Bush administration policies that were working. He had to make a show of setting a deadline, I guess to keep his supporters happy, but he eased under the bus the “mad dash for the exits” strategy that he had trumpeted during the campaign.
Obama could have shown just a smidgen of grace and made a nod in the direction of his predecessor, who, despite the unwavering opposition of people like Senator Barack Obama, managed to pull victory from the jaws of defeat; but Barry doesn’t do magnanimity.
Nope, that’s the “graciousness deficit.” Born of insecurity, I’d say. But, yeah, he’s been better than I expected on Iraq.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Mar 05, 2009 at 8:05 pm Link Comments Off.
A TEA PARTY IN GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA: “Mike Miller brought his young daughter downtown Friday night to the “Greenville Tea Party” rally at the RiverPlace complex, as the Upstate Young Republicans and others protested the government spending in President Barack Obama’s stimulus plan. They weren’t alone. A crowd estimated at 800 to 2,000 people took part in a loud hourlong rally, one of an estimated 60 around the country.”
Despite terrible weather in many cases, citizens braved the wind, cold, and rain to exercise their Constitutional right to protest the current direction of the country under Barack Obama and the Democrats.
In St. Louis, over 1500 attended the Tea Party at the famous arch.
In Chicago, between 800 and 1000 braved the bad weather to gather to protest the massive spending of taxpayers’ money by the federal government.
Atlanta was the site of another well-attended Tea Party.
Many smaller towns and cities participated in the semi-simultaneous events around the country, such as Shelby, Alabama, Asheville, North Carolina, and Greenville, South Carolina.
Stay tuned.
UPDATE: Reader Kaye Evans writes:
You have posted pictures of the Nashville Tea Party gathering at the Legislative Plaza on February 26, and there was much to be learned from the folks who came out on that rainy day.
I was there and spent more time studying the assembled crowd than listening to the speakers. I was struck by how the crowd grew throughout the lunch hour. Many I spoke with had traveled to be a part of the protest.
It was glaringly obvious that these folks were not the $250+K fat cats whom Obama castigates. These people represented the middle class who, ostensibly, will be “helped” by the stimulus spending bills. They clearly were not convinced; they were angered by the class warfare components of his economic policies and the awareness that the burden of his ruinous spending will eventually become theirs to bear.
On a related note, may I suggest an appropriate coda for the New American Tea Party?
In 1835 Alexis de Tocqueville cautioned, “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”
I think we’ll see more people upset about this as time passes.
And reader Miles Wilson says don’t give Rick Santelli too much credit: “Just wanted to remind you that the Rick Santelli ‘rant’ was not the genesis of this movement – in fact, at least four events (Seattle, Denver, Mesa, Overland Park) occurred before the coining of the term ‘tea party’. So credit where credit is due – to the grassroots organizers far from the madding media crowd.”
(Had it as “Mike” Wilson earlier; sorry for the error.}
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Feb 28, 2009 at 8:59 am Link Comments Off.
JOE WURZELBACHER TALKS TO DEMINT, COBURN, BROWN ABOUT THE STIMULUS. Video, 5 minutes; free w/no registration. “Do you think it would be smart for the government to start cutting things instead of spending more?”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Feb 06, 2009 at 7:07 am Link Comments Off.
OH, GOODY: Treasury in plans for record debt sale. “The US Treasury on Wednesday opened the floodgates of government bond issuance, revealing plans for a record debt sale in February and more frequent auctions in the months to come. The announcement came amid growing fears about US government deficits and sent the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note rising to 2.95 per cent, up from just over 2 per cent at the end of December. The rise in Treasury yields has been pushing mortgage rates higher, complicating efforts to revive the economy.” So the “stimulus” is now a drag on the housing market. . . .
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Feb 04, 2009 at 10:56 pm Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 27, 2009 at 10:56 am Link Comments Off.
SOME READERS THINK I’VE BEEN TOO EASY ON GEITHNER: Ila Peralta writes:
I beg to differ with you regarding the importance of Geithner’s tax “lapse”. Why would anyone neglect to pay taxes? Forgot? Not a good sign. Procrastination? Not good. Didn’t know about it? Maybe o.k. for a plumber, but… Above it all? Won’t get caught? Didn’t have the money? (I’m self-employed, too, and I make sure I have the money). Doesn’t believe in taxes? Can you think of one good reason for not paying taxes that portends well for a Secretary of the Treasury? I’d feel better.
And reader Jeff Carlson emails:
I’m sorry but if you do your own taxes and don’t use one of simple, cheap and easy programs available then you are too ignorant to be the Treasury Secretary. And if you did use one it would have prompted you to calculate those SS and Medicare contributions. Only by ignoring them could you have “forgotten” to pay them … for 4 years in a row. Doesn’t pass the smell test. These are not complicated calculations like actual income tax, they are straight percentages.
Yeah, he could have saved himself a world of embarrassment for a mere $42.99. And Jim Treacher is right to note the discrepancy between the press’s ho-hum treatment of Geithner’s unpaid tax problems and its very different treatment of Joe The Plumber’s. But, see, Geithner’s not showing the press up.
Now that said, if we had a Treasury Secretary under Obama who “doesn’t believe in taxes,” well, I could live with that — as long as the hostility extended to taxes paid by other people, too . . . . Meanwhile, here’s a roundup of reactions.
UPDATE: Reader Brian Gates emails: “I’m not questioning Geithner’s taxes . . . but isn’t Joe Biden concerned about Geithner’s patriotism?”
And Donald Hertzmark writes: “I know a lot of yanks working at the Bank/Fund. The personnel department makes a VERY BIG DEAL about making sure that you understand to pay your FICA. This does not wash. Just another chiseler, like Rangel.”
Speaking of Rangel, reader Bob Beales emails: “Maybe we should be nominating Tim Geithner and Charlie Rangel to head up the Internal Revenue Service. They may have a little more compassion for us ‘little guys.’” You’d think so, but it seldom seems to work out that way . . . .
ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Chris Carolan writes:
Yes – “they” are all crooks – but only one crook gets his name on the dollar bill – and in these days of handing out $trillion$ of dollars, the U.S. govt is going to need to borrow those and many more $trillions from foreigners. And that ability to borrow is directly linked to the govt’s ability to get money from the people via the tax code. Anything that encourages people to think that there are two sets of rules, one for us and one for them, erodes the government’s ability to gain tax compliance from the populace. The fact is, this issue and this office are both at the nexus of the ability to fund the future of this country through the tax and borrowing mechanism. For that simple reason, should Mr. Geithner take office, he will do grave harm to our nation.
It does look rather bad that way, and certainly some people will see it as a reason to be less scrupulous regarding their own taxes.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 14, 2009 at 1:50 pm Link Comments Off.
Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, with about $60 billion in assets each, are America’s richest men. With all that money, what can they force us to do? Can they take our house to make room so that another person can build an auto dealership or a casino parking lot? Can they force us to pay money into the government-run retirement Ponzi scheme called Social Security? Can Buffett and Gates force us to bus our children to schools out of our neighborhood in the name of diversity? Unless they are granted power by politicians, rich people have little power to force us to do anything.
A GS-9, or a lowly municipal clerk, has far more life-and-death power over us. It’s they to whom we must turn to for permission to build a house, ply a trade, open a restaurant and myriad other activities. It’s government people, not rich people, who have the power to coerce and make our lives miserable. Coercive power goes a long way toward explaining political corruption.
Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s hawking of Barack Obama’s vacated U.S. Senate seat; Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel’s alleged tax-writing favors; former Rep. William Jefferson’s business bribes; and the Jack Abramoff scandal are mere pimples on the government corruption landscape. We can think of these and similar acts as jailable illegal corruption. They pale in comparison to what’s for all practical purposes the same thing, but simply legal corruption.
Read the whole thing.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 12, 2009 at 10:10 am Link Comments Off.
There’s Rep. Charles Rangel, a New York Democrat who, despite heading the Ways and Means Committee that writes tax law, can’t seem to pay his own taxes. Nor does he see an ethical problem with using his congressional stationery to solicit contributions for a school that City College of New York was building in his honor, a matter that last year became grist for the House ethics committee.
Among those Mr. Rangel hit up for money were officials of insurance giant American International Group. Shortly after their April 2008 meeting, a senior AIG executive who had attended it asked Mr. Rangel to support legislation that would save the company millions. That doesn’t square with Mr. Rangel’s public assertion last summer that he couldn’t recall any issues concerning AIG that came before his committee, or that AIG raised any legislation with him.
Then there’s the matter of New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, President-elect Barack Obama’s nominee for commerce secretary. Mr. Richardson withdrew his name from consideration amid a grand jury investigation into $100,000 in donations to his political action companies from a company, CDR Financial Products. In 2004, around the time of the donations, the company won a state contract worth almost $1.5 million.
And finally there’s Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Mr. Obama’s choice for secretary of state. As part of his wife’s vetting process, former President Bill Clinton agreed to lift the veil of secrecy surrounding the donors to his foundation. Among them was Syracuse (and Crossgates)mall developer Robert Congel, who gave $100,000 in 2004, around the same time that Mrs. Clinton was helping to secure millions of dollars in federal support for Mr. Congel’s Destiny USA project. The help for the project, supported by many New York politicians, included tax-exempt bonds for the complex, and $5 million in a highway bill for road construction.
Yeah, it could almost make you kind of cynical. And they don’t even mention Chris Dodd!
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Jan 06, 2009 at 2:59 pm Link Comments Off.
Last week, two studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine reported promising news about a malaria vaccine candidate that our company, GlaxoSmithKline, is developing in collaboration with the Malaria Vaccine Initiative, a program of the nonprofit organization PATH, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and scientists from across Europe, North America and Africa.
The studies focused on the most vulnerable populations in Kenya and Tanzania. One study reported that the vaccine candidate was 53% effective in preventing episodes of clinical malaria in children five to 17 months old. The second study demonstrated that the vaccine candidate can be administered alongside the standard set of vaccines used in national immunization programs for young infants.
I mentioned this in passing earlier, but this is potentially huge. Most westerners have no idea what a burden malaria is on large parts of the world, but just imagine how economically productive you would be if you had the flu most of the time and you’ll get some sense. I hope it pans out.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Dec 17, 2008 at 6:38 pm Link Comments Off.
JULES CRITTENDEN ON BUSH’S VICTORY LAP: “Mission Accomplished? Well, since you ask, yes. Just like last time, when the mission of knocking out Saddam was accomplished. Don’t believe me, just ask Obama. Or his guy Gates.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Dec 14, 2008 at 10:47 am Link Comments Off.
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Dec 05, 2008 at 11:36 pm Link Comments Off.
NOW THEY TELL US: Obama’s “Not Black,” according to a piece in the Washington Post. Hmm. Gates reappointed at Defense, an Iraq-Hawk Secretary of State, keeping the tax cuts, and now the next President turns out not to be black — hey, they told me if I voted for McCain we’d get a third term for Bush, and I guess they were right!
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Nov 30, 2008 at 9:03 am Link Comments Off.
FRED KAPLAN: “Keeping Robert Gates as secretary of defense is a great idea.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Nov 27, 2008 at 10:03 pm Link Comments Off.
IT’S OKAY WITH ME, BUT NOT THAT CHANGEY: Obama Picks Graybeards As Wartime Cabinet. “Obama has assembled a national security brain trust populated by graybeard establishment figures with decades of combined experience and even a few medals. He is entrusting critical wartime management to people with unassailable credentials and low buzz factor.”
Posted at by Glenn Reynolds on Nov 26, 2008 at 2:21 pm Link Comments Off.
Barack Obama’s signature issue in the primaries was his “good judgment” to oppose the Iraq war. He invoked this more than any other qualification in his early battles with Hillary Clinton. She may have experience, he’d charge, but she lacked the wisdom to oppose the war. Indeed, the whole Democratic establishment was somehow corrupt or out of touch for not opposing the war, according to the Obamaphiles. So now Barack Obama is going to appoint Hillary Clinton to be the chief architect of his foreign policy. Moreover, he picked Joe Biden to be his running mate and “partner” in the White House explicitly because of his foreign policy experience and judgment. But wait: Joe Biden, too, supported the war. Meanwhile, at Defense, it looks like he will keep George W. Bush’s man, Robert Gates. Admittedly, Gates has always been more nuanced about the war than, say, Don Rumsfeld. But surely keeping Bush’s SecDef is not exactly what the anti-war Dems had in mind as “change we can believe in.” Heck, Joe Lieberman’s sitting pretty and he endorsed McCain. It will be interesting to see how long Obama’s charisma can paper over reality.
UPDATE: Reader C.J. Burch emails: “The right bloggers should study all this. Should they form their own Kos contingent they can pretty much count on the same sort of treatment from a future Republican President.” I think that’s probably right and it’s one reason — one of several — why I think the Kos path isn’t the way to go.