The mullahs are destroying yet another landmark of Persia’s ancient past. And it’s easy to understand why: it memorializes an anti-Islamic rebel.
Mohammad-Ali E. from Isfahan
LONDON, (CAIS) — The tomb of Firuzan commonly known as Emāmādeh Abu-lolo (or Abu Lulu) in Kashahn, Isfahan province is being destroyed by the order of the Islamic Regime.
A large crowd of Iranians have gathered outside the governor’s office on Tuesday, June 26th, to voice their objection regarding the destruction of the Iranian heritage, and a shrine which was one of the symbols of Iranian resistance against the Arab invaders in 7th century CE, and to some, a Shia and a revered Sufi.
Umar al-Khattab, the second Moslem Caliph was put to death by Firuzan in 645 CE. It is said that Firuzan was a POW captured after the fall of Ctesiphon in what is today known as Iraq, and sold as a slave. A parvenu Arab leader called Mughira ibn Shu’ba bought him and took him to Medina in Arabia for slavery work.
Most probably Firuzan was a Zoroastrian (by some accounts he was a priest), as the majority of Iranian were at the time of Arab occupation of Iran in 7th century.
“His [Firuzan] action was in response to atrocities that were committed by Arab-Muslim invaders in Iran, which resulted in massacre, rape, looting of our country – we Iranians never forgot nor forgive their crimes against us”, said one of the protestors.
The impetus for the desecration of Firuzan’s tomb came, understandably enough, from Arab “scholars”:
Mohammad Salim Al’awa, the Secretary-General of the International Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS), who believes God have “created women for pregnancy and childbirth” purposes speaking to Al-Arabiat New-agency said: “the request for its destruction was delivered to Iran by a group of Arab representatives a few months ago, after the Doha assembly at the beginning of the year. At the assembly a large number of Sunni scholars asked Iran for the destruction of the tomb”.
No wonder the Muslim world is the way it is.
And by the way, notice that Shi’ite Iran is doing a favor for Sunni religious leaders. I don’t suppose the CIA–which still seems to believe that Sunnis and Shi’ites can’t cooperate–has noticed.



Digg This
del.icio.us

PJM Home







5 Comments
Anusherawan:I don’t think words can describe my ANGER right now.
Jul 2, 2007 - 2:58 am Winston:Islamic regime has inflicted un-reversable damages to Iran since 1979. The entire nation is devastated…
Jul 2, 2007 - 3:07 am Brownie:Nope. The CIA, who don’t believe that Sunni or Shia will cooperate and probably don’t know the difference, are Realists who probably believe, as does our Realistic Secretary of State, that they are all just really nice, peace-loving folks who want so terribly, desperately to do the right thing if only they had a road map to show them the way. Evidently the main problem for Islamofascists is a poor sense of direction.
Jul 2, 2007 - 11:49 am Baroness Wyszynski:Why, Michael, this is how the ‘religion of peace’ maintains.
Jul 2, 2007 - 12:26 pm Ravener:How divisive to have more than one point of reverance…or view.
No surprises there. That society is desperately in need of a Persian Susan B. Anthony.
Great piece from Mr. Card, in the vein of “Faster, Please”:
http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2007-06-03-1.html
ML:
Orson Scott Card, one of the really great fantasy writers, and a pretty good political thinker too. Funny how they go together, iisn’t it?
Jul 2, 2007 - 5:24 pm