This speech was given last September to the San Diego Military Advisory Council at breakfast, by Major General John Kelly (USMC). He’s now the Commander, Multinational Force-West, in Iraq. At the time, he was the deputy to Lt. General James Mattis, a legend among our warrior class, and a great phrasemaker. General Kelly turns out to be every bit as eloquent as his boss, for whom he was substituting that morning in San Diego.
I read it every now and then, good for the spirit.
…we are winning, we are really winning. No one told me to say that, I saw it for myself. The higher command in Baghdad told us four years ago when we first took responsibility for the Al Anbar not to worry about victory, as no one–military or civilian–thought it possible. That thirty years from now when the rest of Iraq was a functioning democracy, Al Anbar would still be a festering cancer within.
…by relentless pursuit by a bunch of 19 years olds with guns who never flinched or gave an inch, while at the same time holding out the carrot of economic development (the sheikhs in Anbar) have seen the light and know AQ can’t win against such men. By staying in the fight, and remaining true to our word, and our honor, AQ today can’t spend more than a few hours in…al Anbar…without being IDed by the locals and killed by the increasingly competent Iraqi Army, or by Marines. That’s the way it is today in this war, but it is also the way it has been since the birth of our nation…
…a few years ago…we were just south of Iraq along the Iraqi-Kuwait border, and poised to launch an attack that would take us over the next three weeks 650 miles into the guts of Iraq, far beyond Baghdad and indeed to Saddam’s hometown palace in Tikrit. When the artillery fires commenced just as the sun went down, and the evening sky above us was one endless formation of Marine, Navy and Air Force fighter aircraft speeding north to smash targets deep in Saddam’s vitals, I was sitting taking it all in with my driver Cpl Dave Hardin from Dallas, and with a reporter from the Los Angeles Times. The reporter asked me a question that I’d never considered in my entire 36 years in the Marine Corps as both enlisted man and officer before the asking, but one I took up in my mind when he did. He pointed out the size and capability of the Iraqi forces in front of us that was many, many times bigger than we were in men, tanks, and artillery. He emphasized much to my discomfort the massive supplies of chemical weapons Saddam was thought to have, and the multiple means he had to rain their terrible kind of death upon us. He asked if I’d ever contemplated defeat. If it was even possible? My thoughts immediately took me back to trips I’d made to Guadalcanal, Iwo Jima, Inchon Korea, and Vietnam, and the conversations I’d had with veterans of those battles, mostly old men now. They tell of friends who made it, and many who didn’t. About the good times, and the bad, but mostly about the good as is typical of our veterans. My response to the reporter was something like: “hell these are Marines. Men like them held Guadalcanal and took Iwo Jima, Baghdad ain’t shit.”
That last line is on a bogus Marine poster that runs around the net every now and then, along with another one that shows half a dozen really mean looking Marines, and a quotation from General Mattis to Iraqi sheikhs, which I can paraphrase: “I come in peace. I did not bring artillery. But I say to you, with tears in my eyes: If you (mess) with me, we’ll kill you all.”
That Kelly could see clearly last September that we were winning in Anbar is significant, it seems to me. He recognized the great, oft ignored fact of this war: that once the Iraqis realized that the Americans couldn’t be beaten, and weren’t going to leave, the whole balance of power shifted. I’ve said that before, but it can’t be repeated often enough. And as the balance of power shifts in Iraq, there is a ripple effect throughout the whole region.
Just ask Khamenei, who is scrambling to buy time, regroup, and find some way to end the humiliation of his failing jihad.
Exciting times indeed.





PJM Home
Accomplice to Evil: Iran and the War Against the West
The Iranian Time Bomb: The Mullah Zealots’ Quest for Destruction
The War Against the Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We Are Now. How We’ll Win.
Tocqueville on American Character: Why Tocqueville’s Brilliant Exploraton of the American Spirit is as Vital and Important Today as it was Nearly Two Hundred Years Ago
Machiavelli on Modern Leadership: Why Machiavelli’s Iron Rules are as Timely and Important Today as Five Centuries Ago
Freedom Betrayed: How America led a Global Democratic Revolution, Won the Cold War and Walked Away
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
1 Comment
1. Terje:Michael,
For you ….
US to Prepare Retaliatory Military Attack Plans on Iran
Following the visit to Washington DC by various Israeli officials, ***** (omitted) understands that
President Bush has ordered the Pentagon to come up with new options on preventing A) Iranian fast-boat attacks on US naval ships and cargo/container ships. B) IF the Iranians are ‘successful’ in attacking a ship, Bush has ordered the Pentagon to come up with the appropriate retaliation.
Meanwhile, as a second US aircraft carrier steamed into the Persian Gulf, the Pentagon in response to Bush’s order, has ordered military commanders to develop new options for attacking Iran.
According to the report, the planning was being driven by what one officer called the “increasingly hostile role” Iran is playing in Iraq – smuggling weapons into Iraq for use against American troops.
Targets would include everything from the plants where weapons are made to the headquarters of the organization known as the Quds Force which directs operations in Iraq.
—-in response to any US attack on Iran, Pres Bush would immediately order SPR supplies to be released mush as his father did in the run-up to the first Gulf War. Crude actually topped out well before the first Gulf War started. Interesting to note that Bush has been asked about the SPR and why does the US govt continue to add to it supplies – in fact the Bush admin wants to increase its capacity to over 1bln barrels.
—-in fact the merchant ship that fired warning shots last week in response to Iranian fast-boat provocation, shows that there has been to a degree an increase in the level of the US response. No longer will the US simply allow Iranian fast-boats to threaten and move within 100yds (from what we understand that is the “line not to be crossed”) of a US guarded ship or a US naval ship. If the Iranians cross that line, an outstanding order is in place to fire to remove the threat. There is not one country in the Mideast at this time that would criticize the US for taking such defensive measures. And every American remembers the USS Cole.
**** (again omitted) has discussed previously the last major confrontation with Iran in 1986 in what was dubbed “Operation Praying Mantis” by President Reagan. This attack came in response to the US Naval ship almost being sunk by one of Iran’s mines in the Persian Gulf. On April 14, 1988 the guided missile frigate USS Samuel B. Roberts stuck a mine and almost sunk. Ominously analogous to what happened last week, the Roberts was protecting convoys as part of “Operation Earnest Will”. The US naval attack response was the largest surface naval attack by the US since WWII. It destroyed Iranian oil platforms and bases.
Net /net: while the world focuses on $120 oil and an accelerating US recession, it may appear that Iran has slipped somewhat to the back pages. Well, not for people who think of such matters for a living…
ML:
Reads like Debka. I don’t believe it.
Apr 30, 2008 - 12:04 pm