Faster, Please!

May 3rd, 2008 10:06 am

Ice

When I first came to Italy in 1965 (egad!) I went to Florence.  It was August.  No air conditioning.  Frightfully hot.  In piazza San Lorenzo, back of the Medici family church, they sold bottles of Coca Cola for some small number of lire, and it was hot Coke, because there wasn’t any ice.  Probably in the luxury hotels you could get some ice cubes in your coke, but out there in the streets and piazzas, no go.  Of course I asked, in my then-fractured pidgen Italian, and they all said that I really didn’t want ice in my coke because ice was so terribly dangerous to the liver.  Indeed, people drinking cold Coke were known to drop dead from it, as the liver went into total paralysis.

As time passed, I learned that the list of things very dangerous for your liver was quite a long one, including eggs for example.  One night, many eggless months after my arrival, I had an egg gouamba, and ordered six of them over easy, and a quantity of bacon.  The waiter actually begged me to reconsider.  He clearly thought I was going to die in his trattoria.

You don’t hear much about the fragility of your liver these days, and if you order a Coke and you don’t want ice, you have to stipulate “no ice.”  Otherwise it comes with the usual cubes.  How do things like this happen?  It strikes me as a fundamental cultural shift.  Did we ugly Americans convince the Italians that ice was ok?  Did medical advances strengthen the Mediterranean liver so that the locals could drink cold Coke without fear of a painful and certain death?  Or did tastes change?  And if they did, why did they change?

We historians worry a lot about such questions.  On a higher cultural level, this sort of thing is similar to the famous question, “why is there a history of art?”  Why did artists change the way they portrayed reality on canvas?  Yes, Giotto worked out perspective, but why was that important to him?  And why didn’t previous artists do the same?  And where did the idea come from?  Careful with your answer.  If you’re tempted to say, well it’s obvious, isn’t it?  The world is three dimensional, so artists wanted to show the world as it really is…then how will you explain later changes like expressionism?   And what will you do with Picasso?  Dali’?  And then how did things swing back toward hyper realism like Warhol?

And why do the Italians like ice nowadays?  Does it have something to do with Berlusconi, is it part of the political revolution that is apparently under way?

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

2 Comments

1. Roger L Simon:

Hey, Mr. Occam… what about the possibility that they can afford freezers now?

ML:

Sure, in the sense that they needed freezers to make the ice. But that whole theory about killing off your liver, that isn’t technology driven, is it? And I don’t think that just being able to do something translates into a desire to do it. Rather the other way around, normally.

May 4, 2008 - 10:49 am 2. j green:

Assuming that the cause of death for many people had been “liver failure due to ice or egg ingestion,” if indeed a decrease in such fatalities has occured, it is undoubtedly related to a) the Italians learning how to properly diagnose causes of death, b)the Italians having better sanitation methods, or c) the Italians embracing more western habits rather than their old-world traditions. Either way I relate it to Berlusconi’s capitalist policies that Italy is far more successful now.

May 4, 2008 - 3:02 pm

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments:
 

Michael Ledeen

Author Photo

Archives

Books

by Michael Ledeen

by Michael Ledeen

by Michael Ledeen

...transcend[s] mere descriptive narrative and seek[s] to fix a value—political, philosophical or strategic—on the events of 9/11…
—Tunku Varadarajan
Wall Street Journal

by Michael Ledeen

Michael Ledeen takes a fresh look at Tocqueville’s insights into our national psyche and asks whether Americans’ national character, which Tocqueville believed to be wholly admirable, has fallen into moral decay and religious indifference.

by Michael Ledeen

American Enterprise Institute resident scholar Ledeen offers an updated version of the rules for leadership laid down by Machiavelli. Its the nature of humans to do evil, and war is our natural state. Anyone who would wield power in such a setting, writes Ledeen, echoing Machiavelli, “must be prepared to fight at all times.” This is as true in business, sports, and politics as it is on the battlefield.
Kirkus Reviews

by Michael Ledeen

With the skill of a born storyteller, Michael Ledeen weaves together key moments in the fall of communism. His insider’s knowledge of the interplay of complex personalities and Byzantine strategies makes a compelling narrative, one enlivened by his wry wit and flair for the dramatic.

In this call to embrace the worldwide democratic revolution, the author argues that global democracy should be the centerpiece of U.S. strategy.