Faster, Please!

August 27th, 2008 4:18 pm

The Women

Support Pajamas Media; Visit Our Advertisers

If there’s going to be a real revolution in the Middle East, I think it will have to be led by the women. A couple of years ago, I organized a symposium on “the women of the middle east,” which had considerable echo. It was not the usual “women and Islam” discussion, important as that is, but included Jews, Copts, and atheists, from several different countries. It featured an Israeli woman who said, rightly I thought, that she felt sorry for her Arab sisters, who were not free to speak their minds or even pursue their lives. Many of the other women thanked her, and said she was entirely right.

I think that the tyrannical rulers of the Middle East actively fear their women, at all levels of their being. They fear anything approaching equal rights for women because they know that women have been singled out for humiliation, degradation, and constant violence, both the official kind (as in the recent Iranian case where two women were beaten up by ‘morals enforcers’ for dressing inappriately) and the ‘normal’ kind, where husbands beat wives, fathers beat daughters, and so forth.

An American Army poet stationed in Iraq, Army Specialist Danielle Wheeler, has said it far better than I can:

Behind the Veil

If you asked who the strongest woman would be, I’d say an Iraqi woman.
They’re the strongest I’ve seen.
Here a woman can get beat up just for not being pretty enough.
I guess it all starts off when they are daughters.
Sold off to be married to other men by their fathers.
That poor woman, married to someone she doesn’t know,
Told she’d have his children and make his home.
If her husband is poor without a camel or a cow,
She’ll be outside in the sun pulling the plow.
When her husband comes home and his dinner is burned,
She’ll get a black eye she believes she earned.
She could try to dodge, get away from the attack.
She knows it’d be worse if she tried to fight back.
You think it doesn’t get worse than this?
All this is done in front of the kids.
When she starts to show her age he can beat her to death,
Find someone younger, prettier and marry again.
No matter what happens, she’s always wrong.
That’s not everything; I could go on and on.
If I were them, I’d wear a veil too.
No better way of hiding a bruise.

h/t to Blackfive, as usual an invaluable source on our heroes in the region.

Iraq is far from the worst place in this regard, but you cannot get to know an Iraqi woman without hearing about the nastiness of their lives, and this includes very important woman, members of Parliament for example, leaders of political parties, even women at the highest levels of ministries. In other places, women can’t ever reach such status. They’re just oppressed.

There is no clearer sign of the fecklessness of the West, above all the Western Left, than the near-total silence about the oppression of women, especially in our enemies’ countries.  The American and European feminists were never about real liberation, anyway;  they just wanted to be treated like men.  They got it, by and large, so that big balloon is now out of air.  There is nothing left for their truly oppressed foreign sisters.

An unknown number of Iranian women are on death row, awaiting their terrible execution by stoning. The Iranian Government has suspended some of these sentences for the moment, but the latest stoning was just last year, a new legal code does not ban stoning, and government ministers continue to defend it.

And I haven’t even mentioned Saudi Arabia, the monster misogynist of the region.

Go to any of the scholarly studies of the failure of the Arab world (and Iran, not an Arab country, can join this crowd) to advance its civil societies, its creative enterprises, its industries, its educational systems, and you’ll find that the exclusion and oppression of women is invariably listed as one of the most important causes.

It’s another one of those cases, about which I am now writing a book, where everyone sees the evil but nobody is willing to do anything about it. One might “understand” the West’s unwillingness to recognize the evil in the Kremlin or the evil in Damascus; doing something effective against such regimes is difficult, risky and costly. But what does it take to denounce the oppression of women? I think the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Iran’s Ms. Ebadi was what we used to call a conscience-balm; a lot of Westerners could tell themselves that “we supported her/them, now let’s move on.”

The women of the Middle East are a revolutionary force, which we are morally, politically and strategically obliged to support. The Bush Administration, which featured a lot of women in high office (from Laura to Condi to Karen to Harriet etc etc), disgracefully failed to rally to the side of oppressed women. Let’s hope the next crowd does better.

Comment DiggDigg This Delicious del.icio.us Digg Print Digg PJM Home

12 Comments

1. RAN:

Next crowd? Dunno. Telling women to avoid Wall Street and to serve instead in social programs doesn’t sound all that ‘liberating.’ [Then again, one can blithely recommend such from the height of $300kpa. Changes one's perspective.]

Aug 27, 2008 - 7:14 pm 2. heather:

and why not? It seems so simple to me: the weakest part of the Islamic world is its treatment of women… how to get at that topic without running up against the (understandable) reaction of these women to well meaning advice by such as Karen Hughes.

And getting at this issue is so important to the fate of OUR world, as we go about this Long War. Phyllis Chesler has been covering this. One thing we can do in this country is define “honor killings”, and set up places where these women/victims can hide and begin new lives.

I still remember one journalist talking about how, the desert around Riyadh is crowded with the ghosts of murdered women.

Aug 27, 2008 - 8:45 pm 3. Dan:

Come on Professor,

the women there are TOO beaten down to even think of standing up.

There are voices in the deserts and wastelands of the Middle East, and if you’re silent you can discern the mournful echo of women who tried to stand, who tried to resist, who tried to preserve a small shred of human dignity, ———————– and were uncermoniously dragged out into the empty spaces, and laid low.

And that has been occurring for CENTURIES now.

Mohammadenism IS TOTALITARIANISM, it’s the longest running Totalitarianism in human history. And as the late Solzhenitsyn warned us of such Totalitarianisms, they don’t last not because there isn’t resistance thereto, they last because they are INHUMANLY strong, Satanically strong, strong as the very foundations of Hell itself.

There has been no uprising amongst Mohammedan men.

There will be no uprising amongst Mohammedan women.

Relief will come from without.

As Sherman journeyed South, as Patton tore through the Saar, only then will ordered liberty ever stand a chance in such societies.

Aug 27, 2008 - 9:28 pm 4. Dan:

That’s grim indeed, I know.

But just read some of the writings of Andrew Bostom, just read some of the stuff by Bat Yeor.

There will be nothing from within, it will only arrive from without.

Aug 27, 2008 - 9:30 pm 5. kourosh:

“Islam is deeply anti-woman. Islam is the fundamental cause of the repression of Muslim women and remains the major obstacle to the evolution of their position.[1] Islam has always considered women as creatures inferior in every way: physically, intellectually, and morally. This negative vision is divinely sanctioned in the Koran, corroborated by the hadiths, and perpetuated by the commentaries of the theologians, the custodians of Muslim dogma and ignorance.
Far better for these intellectuals to abandon the religious argument, to reject these sacred texts, and have recourse to reason alone. They should turn instead to human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted on December 10, 1948, by the General Assembly of the United Nations in Paris and ratified by most Muslim countries) at no point has recourse to a religious argument. These rights are based on natural rights, which any adult human being capable of choice has. They are rights that human beings have simply because they are human beings. Human reason or rationality is the ultimate arbiter of rights - human rights, the rights of women.”

Reference:
http://islam-watch.org/IbnWarraq/Islam’s-Shame-Veil-Tears.htm

Then how come the so-called defenders of human rights (Free world, particularly Western European countries) allow the atrocities against women to continue. As a matter of fact the men who are loaded, despite the fact that they are committing atrocities against women, are welcomed in Europe along with their 16 wives and their cars. They would brought their Camels if allowed. That means there is nothing that Islamist petro-dollars can’t buy. That includes: Hush Hushing Human Rights, IHT, BBC, and Amnesty International. Otherwise, these organizations would have a program to pressure European countries denying visas to those who force women to cover themselves head to toe, and marry 100 of women at the same time. When there is money, human rights is only a slogan for European. Just visit London, Rome, and Paris, you will see 000s of oppressed women shopping big time. That is the bottom line for the West, not the Human Rights.

ML:

Yes, well said. It is an old story, as the oppressors try to buy off the oppressed. But it is a dangerous game, since all those women shopping in the West see how their sisters are living, and they wants it, in Gollum’s great line.

Aug 28, 2008 - 8:57 am 6. Cyrus:

What about our “moderate” Arab ally of Saudia Arabia. They are the same as the Taliban was before they got their asses booted out of Afghanistan , which was to the delight of the people of Afghanistan. But the problem is is that the Saudis have strong supporters in the U.S.; so allot of their human rights atrocities aren’t well known as they should be. Go Steelers!

Aug 29, 2008 - 4:32 pm 7. 11B40:

Greetings:

My father used to tell me that Moses took the Jews into the desert for forty years so that those who suffered slavery could die off and a new generation could come to its maturity.

Aug 29, 2008 - 8:30 pm 8. heather:

a friend of mine pointed out that the type of woman exemplified by Hillary (strong, cold-eyed, ruthless wife of strong man) is well known in the tribal lands of the Middle East.

Someone like Sarah Palin, though, is a whole new kettle of fish: she is self made, her husband is a hard worker as is she; she is a mother of 5 children; she hunts moose, and she fishes, and she is a member of the NRA; she is a Governor of Alaska, she is CUTE, she and her husband work together (and while she is busy governing, he stays home with the kids, when he isn’t winning snowmobile endurance races, and fishing on the ocean, and working on oil rigs.)
She has broken the mold of women politicians. I think she is the kind of role model that will make the Middle Eastern woman sit up and take notice.

Aug 29, 2008 - 10:19 pm 9. a Duoist:

After thousands of years of evolving standards, the current sociology of Judao-Christian peoples is ‘guilt/rights,’ whereas the sociology of the Islamic peoples is ‘honor/shame.’ These sociological differences are so disparate that there is no real likelihood of one becoming more like the other in the near years ahead.

It would be much more effective to stress Muhammad’s dramatic personal improvement in the lives of Arab women, and ask why ‘frightened’ Muslim men no longer follow his example of improving the lives of women.

Sep 1, 2008 - 2:21 am 10. ginger:

Laura Bush made several very compelling speeches on this subject. Pity the press didn’t choose to cover it. But it’s an election year. Can’t do anything supportive of the Republicans.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/11/20011117.html

Katie Couric on the other hand agreed to don a burka so she could cover a puff piece on a Saudi market for the Today show. That was when I stopped watching NBC. It used to be where I got my morning news.

Later she “impishly” donned a burka to read the news when she became a nightly anchor. Real cute, Katie.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/09/18/060918crte_television

ML:

Laura’s remarks are seven years old, I’m not aware that there has been any decent followup. Please tell me I’m wrong…
Don’t blame the Bushes for this one.

Sep 2, 2008 - 7:03 am 11. kourosh:

I believe strongly the people who ran German economy, industry, and official media these days, are all Left-Over-Nazis. Germany is the main supporter of anti-human regime of Khomeinists. As a matter of fact from the time Ahmaghi-nejad has opened his dirty mouth and issued treat against non-Muslim and particularly Jews and Israel, Germans have expanded their economic cooperation with murderous regime of IRI by 20%. German don’t care about the plight of women, students, journalists, and other human being. It seems they are still living in 1940s when it comes to human rights. In addition, German Nazi-based media is constantly propagating nonsense against the USA, and for pleasing the IRI. As it was reported in the media, even 9/11 terrorists planned their anti-civilization attack on NY in Germany. German still provide tribune to terrorists Islamists, including IRI, Hezbol-Ah, and other Islamo-fascists. In recent months there have been many events welcoming and pleasing IRI thugs in Germany. These events include free- dinner gathering (to gather more uneducated bazaari-style merchants who care more about their stomach and there lower, than anything else) in Hamburg. One wonders, when these IRI-Terrorists supporting Germans will become real human.

Sep 3, 2008 - 10:48 am 12. Alex Bensky:

It’s not the silence of western feminists that appalls me, it’s the fact that some of them manage through convuluted reason actually to support it or atleast deem it a legitimate cultural expression.

Besides, we all know what the cause is of the oppression of Muslim women: Israeli occupation of the territories. We know this because it’s the cause of all the troubles in the Middle East.

Sep 5, 2008 - 2:17 pm

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
remember personal info?
Comments:
 

Michael Ledeen

Author Photo

Elsewhere on the Web

Books


The Iranian Time Bomb: The Mullah Zealots’ Quest for Destruction
by Michael Ledeen

The War Against the Terror Masters: Why It Happened. Where We Are Now. How We’ll Win.

by Michael Ledeen

…transcend[s] mere descriptive narrative and seek[s] to fix a value—political, philosophical or strategic—on the events of 9/11…
—Tunku Varadarajan
Wall Street Journal


Tocqueville on American Character: Why Tocqueville’s Brilliant Exploraton of the American Spirit is as Vital and Important Today as it was Nearly Two Hundred Years Ago
by Michael Ledeen Michael Ledeen takes a fresh look at Tocqueville’s insights into our national psyche and asks whether Americans’ national character, which Tocqueville believed to be wholly admirable, has fallen into moral decay and religious indifference.

Machiavelli on Modern Leadership: Why Machiavelli’s Iron Rules are as Timely and Important Today as Five Centuries Ago

by Michael Ledeen

American Enterprise Institute resident scholar Ledeen offers an updated version of the rules for leadership laid down by Machiavelli. Its the nature of humans to do evil, and war is our natural state. Anyone who would wield power in such a setting, writes Ledeen, echoing Machiavelli, “must be prepared to fight at all times.” This is as true in business, sports, and politics as it is on the battlefield.
Kirkus Reviews


Freedom Betrayed: How America led a Global Democratic Revolution, Won the Cold War and Walked Away

by Michael Ledeen

With the skill of a born storyteller, Michael Ledeen weaves together key moments in the fall of communism. His insider’s knowledge of the interplay of complex personalities and Byzantine strategies makes a compelling narrative, one enlivened by his wry wit and flair for the dramatic.

In this call to embrace the worldwide democratic revolution, the author argues that global democracy should be the centerpiece of U.S. strategy.

Archives