Yesterday, the indomitable Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld had her day in court. This time, the New York State Court of Appeals heard her case. Ehrenfeld was sued by the ever-litigious billionaire, Sheikh Khalid Bin Mahfouz, who sued her in London for writing a book (Funding Evil) which was published in America where Ehrenfeld, an Israeli-American citizen, resides.
Ehrenfeld chose not to appear in the London courtroom and Mahfouz won a default judgment. Instead, she counter-sued Mahfouz here. Ehrenfeld is arguing that New York should have jurisdiction to decide whether such a judgment is enforceable in New York State where, after all, authors enjoy a First Amendment right to publish their views.
Ehrenfeld is doing the heavy lifting for us all. She is doing so on her own. A new, brief video about her important First Amendment/Libel case has just been released in both English and Arabic. PRESS HERE TO VIEW IT.
Indeed, western publishers are increasingly reluctant to publish work, however well documented or timely, if it exposes the Islamist funding of terrorism and the influence of the Saudi and Palestinian Lobbies. Publishers fear that they will be sued or bombed or that they, too, may have to pulp an already published book as Cambridge University Press has recently done to the book Alms for Jihad.
Thus, Free speech and academic freedom are indeed under siege in the West–not because of western government censorship but because Islamists like Sheikh Khalid Bin Mahfouz either sue authors and publishers or influence intellectual points of view by funding academic Institutes, organizations, and conferences.
In an era where fatwas have been issued against those who have exited and/or who criticize fundamentalist Islam (Salman Rushdie, Taslima Nasrin, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Flemming Rose, Lars Viks all immediately come to mind), an era in which countless authors and news media have written letters of apology to bin Mahfouz in order to avoid costly lawsuits, author Rachel Ehrenfeld’s principled stand is highly commendable.
My most recent work about Islamic religious and gender Apartheid (The Death of Feminism), has, for the first time, been unable to find a European publisher, including one in the UK–no matter that my publisher, based in both London and New York, submitted the manuscript to a grueling and careful review by a prominent First Amendment lawyer.
My circumstance is far from unique. I have written an Introduction to a cutting edge book by Dr. Nancy Kobrin, which explores the psycho-analytic roots of Islamic suicide terrorism. At the last moment, Dr. Kobrin’s American publisher backed out of the contract; they said that they could not afford to pay to protect their employees.
All people who care about freedom of thought and speech will either have to pay the high price such liberties exact or be prepared to lose them.
Yes, in case you were wondering: The video makes the rather sensational claim that Mahfouz has moved his young male lover into an exclusive mansion in Mayfair. He can do so in London; regrettably, if this is true, his life would be endangered in Saudi Arabia.



Digg This
del.icio.us

PJM Home
The Death of Feminism: What’s Next in the Struggle for Women’s Freedom
Women and Madness
The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It
Woman’s Inhumanity to Woman
Women of the Wall: Claiming Sacred Ground at Judaism’s Holy Site
Letters to a Young Feminist
With Child: A Diary of Motherhood
Feminist Foremothers in Women’s Studies, Psychology, and Mental Health
Patriarchy: Notes of an Expert Witness
>Sacred Bond: The Legacy of Baby M
Mothers on Trial: The Battle for Children and Custody
About Men
Women, Money & Power


4 Comments
mac latner:Its pretty sick & disgusting how so many people cave in when they are threatend by big money or sell out to big money. being born a british subject in canada and having served in world war 11 in the canadian forces, I am ashamed to acqnowledge that I have anything to do with the present english country . its royalty or its govt.
Nov 16, 2007 - 11:34 am George Jochnowitz:Deborah Lipstadt’s book HISTORY ON TRIAL spells out in detail the enormous expense and risk involved in responding to the lawsuit against her by David Irving. She won, with the economic and legal help of others, but the average person would not have had the resources to deal with such a situation
Nov 16, 2007 - 1:22 pm Mundus611:It’s past time the Congress addresses this. Not doing so,makes a travesty of our Human Rights laws and
Nov 16, 2007 - 5:35 pm David Thomson:advocacy and the FREEDOMS guaranteed by the First Amendment.We cannot and must not permit this to continue, and the US and the UK can agree to forbid this.Otherwise, this kind of suppression will spread to many other subjects.
Phyllis, you DO have an enormous amount of support.I think, it is past time ,also, to form a concerted group
to push for women’s rights and their comparable freedoms–in accordance with the West’s concepts–NOT that of the Muslims.
“It’s past time the Congress addresses this.”
A Democrat controlled Congress is not going to do any such thing. Neither Nancy Pelosi nor Harry Reid dare defy the politically correct leftist “elites” who dominate their party. Your only hope is with the election of conservative Republicans in 2008. The less than perfect GOP is the only game in town.
Nov 16, 2007 - 11:36 pm