Chesler Chronicles

Email This to a Friend

* Your name:

* Your email address:

* Your friend's name:

* Your friend's email address:

Message:

* Required Fields

July 24th, 2008 11:56 am

The Hero Wears Hijab. A Film Review.

There is a certain kind of film that casts a spell over its viewers: You enter its reality as if the film is your own private dream and its’ languorous, dream-like effect lingers long after you’ve left the theatre. Brick Lane is such a film.

Yes, I know, the film has been out for awhile. Call me old-fashioned but I think that some things are worth thinking and writing about forever, not just as breaking news and potential fish wrap.

I wanted to see how well the film portrayed immigrant Muslim life in London. Would it focus only on British-Caucasian racism or only on Muslim charges of “Islamophobia?” The film shows us both realities–but since it is a work of art, not merely another television-like piece of entertainment, it shows us much more, but very quietly, softly. The film is told from it’s heroine’s point of view.

When she is seventeen, a young, shy, quiet, modest, and uneducated Bangladeshi girl, Nazneen Ahmed, is sent off to London to marry a man, Chanu, whom she has never met, who is old enough to be her father, and who looks about three times her size. She has lost her mother to suicide and her father has now separated her forever from her sister, who is also her best and only friend, and with whom she corresponds, almost daily.

The film’s first magic trick is to show us how, over time, an arranged marriage (in this particular case, or in the case of those who accept this custom), can both “work” and even lead to love.

Nazneen’s husband, (played by Satish Kaushik), is an educated man, pompous, decent, hard-working–a domestic tyrant but not a physically abusive one. He does not have a prayer of succeeding in England. He is never promoted. His pride forces him to quit his civil servant’s position; unwisely, he borrows money from a scavenger, a bottom-feeder–a Muslim woman, a usurer, who enriches herself at the expense of other Muslim immigrants. Chanu, who reads Hume and Proust, finally gets a job as a bus driver.

Nazneen lives in profound but uncomplaining isolation. When her husband quits his job, she decides to work for money sewing clothing at home. Chanu does not approve of this but he does not stop her. Nazneen–who thinks of the Bangladesh of her childhood when she is having marital sex–has extraordinary chemistry with Karim, the young British-born Muslim man who brings her the garments to sew. Karim, (played by Christopher Simpson), views Nazneen as “the real thing,” a simple village girl. The chemistry between them is extraordinary and they are inevitably drawn to each other. Our shy girl enjoys a brief and unexpected adulterous affair.

“Oh-oh,” my companion and I thought: It’s a Bangladeshi Anna Karenina. How wrong we were. What happens is nothing short of amazing.

Nazneen refuses to divorce her husband to marry her beautiful lover, who has become an angry Muslim anti-Western activist. And, when her husband, who cannot bring himself to condemn England, finally decides to return to Bangladesh after 9/11–Nazneen decides to stay in London without him! And she does so at precisely the moment it becomes clear to her that she really loves her husband.

Then Chanu matches her. Playing against type, he lovingly blesses her decision to remain in London together with their two westernized daughters.

And yes, our hero wears hijab. For those who know my work, let me assure you that this film has not led me to approve of forced veiling (or even of veiling), but that is not the issue in this film and the hero is indeed a hero and she does wear hijab.

This film is a powerful female coming-of-age story and a fine feminist drama. We care about these people, they are “real.” They are with me still and might remain with me for a long time.

Kudos to director Sarah Gavron, to her peerless cast, and to Monica Ali, who wrote the novel upon which the film is based.

I urge you to see Brick Lane or to rent the DVD. It stands head and shoulders above all the violent and cynical Hollywood re-runs that dominate our screens this summer.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

3 Comments

1. mizpants:

Saw it yesterday, on your recommendation. It was terrific. My only complaint was the insistent soundtrack, and maybe a few too many lyrical flashbacks.
Your summary was excellent, but what really stays with me is the husband’s endearing and admirable efforts to educate himself in Western literature, and, especially, his great moment during the meeting of the Bengal Tiger self-defense militia, when he makes his plea for Enlightenment values. That’s the film’s turning point.
I plan to read the novel now. If the movie represents it at all accurately, it must be a thoughtful one. It seems to me that maybe we’ve reached a point when the deeper significance of 9/11 has sunk in and is surfacing as literature. After all, it was so very recent.

Jul 27, 2008 - 7:52 am 2. J.J. Sefton:

Great movie. Stunning visuals and great performances. Interesting how the girl’s character “arced,” as we screenwriters say, through the performances of her husband and her lover. Go see it.

Jul 28, 2008 - 7:37 am 3. S. Berry:

I put the blame on “Jihad Rising” on Jimmy
Carter and his pusillanimous response to the
Iranian takeover of the American Embassy. The
Jihadists read his non-action as a sign that
the west was weak and the time had come to reverse 1492,

Aug 1, 2008 - 12:46 pm

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: