Chesler Chronicles

October 15th, 2008 10:04 pm

No One Talked About Jihad in the Last Great Debate

Granted: Our leaders, both Democrats and Republicans, have allowed the American economy to fail. The pain this has caused and will continue to cause is incalculable. Maybe We, the People should fire everyone in the House and the Senate, hang Wall Street out to dry, and start from scratch--only we can't, that game is rigged against us.

Maybe this dreadful economic failure was the "October surprise" that Obama's people kept promising. A handful of policy pundits have opined that the Arab Oil Cartel and possibly George Soros had a hand in this economic meltdown. I wouldn't be surprised but I'd need to see the smoking gun on this one.

But then there was the matter of the camel in the room. Neither candidate seemed to notice the "rough beast whose hour has come round." Three debates--and neither Obama nor McCain seriously wrestled with the imminent danger of Islamic jihad, Obama because he does not see it that way, McCain because he has chosen not to make an issue of what is possibly the Mother of all issues.

As McCain would say: My friends, America has not only endured 9/11 and its complicated aftermath, we are now faced with a silent jihad, a soft, stealthy, slow and patient imposition of shari'a law in America.

All over our country, Muslim students and leftist professors are being funded to showcase the Big Lies of Palestinian Victimhood and Israeli Evil. And above all, to hate America. Tommorrow, at Georgetown University, the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center
for Muslim-Christian Understanding, is hosting a conference titled: "Is There a Role for Shari'ah in Modern States?" The infamous John Esposito will be speaking and none other than Harvard's Noah Feldman will be delivering the keynote address.

In addition, Muslim students are demanding and receiving separatist halal kitchens in college; heretofore, they shared the kosher facilities with Jewish students but no longer, at least not at Columbia University. Footbaths are being demanded in public spaces, more and more women are walking around fully sheeted or in hijab, one encounters an increasing number of prayer services in the street which have the feel of an aggressive political protest and not a humble, private surrender to God.

All this is accompanied by charges of "Islamophobic racism."

As I sat down to share my thoughts about this final debate, I received an email from a blogger known as "YidwithLid." He did a quick piece of research about one of the men whom Obama, in this last debate, said would be advising him when Obama is in the White House: Senator Richard Lugar. Although Obama has said he is pro-Israel, according to my blogger informant, Lugar is one of the most anti-Israel Senators.

"When, on May 22, 1998, the Senate, by a vote of 90 to 4, passed the Iran Missile Proliferation Sanctions Act, imposing sanctions on foreigners who help Iran's missile program, Mr. Lugar fetched up among the four senators who voted against the measure.

On July 24, 2001, the Senate voted 96 to 2 to renew the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act to help deny Iran and Libya money that they would spend on supporting terrorism or acquiring weapons of mass destruction. The only two senators who opposed the measure were Obama's buddies Lugar and Hagel.

On April 6, 2001, 87 members of the Senate sent President Bush a letter saying Yasser Arafat should not be invited to meet with high-level officials in Washington until he renounced terrorism against Israel. Lugar declined to sign the letter.

On April 18, 2002, when the Senate, by 88 to 10, voted to ban the import to America of Iraqi oil until Iraq stopped compensating the families of Palestinian Arab suicide bombers, Messrs. Lugar and Hagel were among the handful who voted to bring in the oil.

In a July 10, 2003, editorial headlined "Ayatollah Lugar," have already reported on how Mr. Lugar watered down the Iran Democracy Act that was introduced by Senators Brownback, Schumer, Kyl, Inouye, and others."

Obama was relaxed, urbane, eloquent, he seemed to be enjoying himself. But Obama kept smiling, even smirking, each time McCain caught him in a lie. I am not sure whether such smiling is sheer arrogance on Obama's part or whether it suggests that this is how he has learned to deal with attacks, pretending that they don't matter, that he's not hurt.

McCain displayed true principle, especially when he talked about his non-ideological ("no litmus test") requirements for Supreme Court nominees, and the fact that he voted for both Breyer and Ginsberg for the highest court in the land. And yet, his heart was not that of a fighter, willing to go that extra distance to draw blood.

Let me close by quoting a member of one of the many Focus groups shown on television tonight. "We are not electing the best debator. We are electing the President of the United States."

Let's try to remember that when we cast our votes.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

33 Comments

1. Dave:

Looks like we have to suppress a major religion,Islam, in order to keep it from repressing us.

Goes against our grain to do this.

What we lack is the achieved capability to point out that Muslims bring the suppression
upon themselves.

Their theology is such that they are currently
incapable of refraining from theocracy. That is what happens when you worship what a colleague of mine aptly described as “a sock-puppet deity.” Until they learn to reject the notion of an anthromorphic god and grasp that of a transcendent one, their religion will remain a Leninist one.

We have every natural right to put it in its place.

Oct 15, 2008 - 10:46 pm 2. David Thomson:

“But Obama kept smiling, even smirking, each time McCain caught him in a lie.”

Obama is far too casual with his lying. It is second nature to him. This should scare the hell out of us. He clearly lied regarding his position on infanticide. What else is he lying about?

“And yet, his heart was not that of a fighter, willing to go that extra distance to draw blood.”

John McCain is too politically correct “to draw blood” from a “man of color.” In his heart of hearts, he is afraid of being charged with racism. That is the number one reason why McCain has continuously fought against Obama with one hand tied behind his back.

Oct 16, 2008 - 4:17 am 3. David Thomson:

The fear of being charged with racism is very widespread. I just remembered that Phyllis Chesler’s own son warned her not to be racist towards Barack Obama! This is a quintessential example of the extent of the madness. We are in serious danger. I am utterly convinced that if Obama possessed blue eyes and blond hair—most people would quickly realize the grave threat.

Oct 16, 2008 - 5:31 am 4. George Jochnowitz:

I hadn’t known about Lugar’s voting record. Thank you for telling me, Phyllis. McCain must have known how his fellow Republican senator voted. He could have responded to Obama’s “I was 8 years old” statement about Ayers by saying that Lugar was part of present-day politics.

Oct 16, 2008 - 6:40 am 5. cfbleachers:

Phyllis, the problem with the debate format for getting out key issues that are relevant to Senator Obama’s positions, policies and predilections is that that particular medium allows for only putting an issue “in the shop window”. It is usually up to our information stream to then expand upon it and to present facts that give it fuller meaning. One problem, if the information stream has been hijacked, we never receive the fuller meaning.

Let’s take for instance the Jesse Jackson statements in France, whereby he declares that the “Zionists” will be stripped of their “influence” in America under the Obama regime.

Senator Obama’s campaign returns to a tried and true non-denial, repudiation of the comments. He says that Jesse Jackson is not an advisor to the campaign. But, that’s really not the issue at hand, would you think? The real issue, completely, wholly and utterly ignored by the entrenched media…is why would Jesse Jackson believe such a thing in the first place? It is of little moment that Jackson is not an “official” advisor, with a title in the campaign, if indeed Jackson has daily contact with a dozen insiders who allow him to “indirectly” influence the shifting tides of sentiment within it.

What our suddenly very incurious members of the imprisoned and silenced information stream utterly failed to ask, is why this particular issue seems to pop up in different places, only to be hammered down again like an insidious game of Whack A Mole.

Robert Malley, he of the rabid Jew hating parentage, his parents having been kicked out of France for despicable acts of slander and hatred, was found to be meeting with Hamas, albeit, it was claimed to be without the campaign’s knowledge or sanction. Much like Lugar, anyone who didn’t know Malley’s prior antipathy toward Israel, and his coming from a lineage of venomous hatred, might simply be accepting of the quick exit stage left, very far left of one, tiny little infraction, by someone who was, of course…”not an official member of the campaign, who didn’t have an official title, who doesn’t mean anything, nothing happening here, please move along”.

Of course, we are told to ignore and forget the ramblings of Jeremiah Wright, the twenty year associaton with Wright, his rabid and venomous hatred and the embrace of Wright, more importantly the lionizing by Wright and his congregation, of Louis Farrakhan. Our suddenly sonambulent entrenched media are too sleepy to connect the deductive dots, they studiously avoid even connecting the ADMITTED dots.

Of course, Wright, Moss, Meeks, Pfleger are “distractions” who do not hold any “official” title in the campaign and do not act as “advisors” on policy…blah, blah, blah.

But why would Jeremiah Wright say that he and Obama spoke and they agreed that Wright would have to be “hidden” until after the campaign, because he holds such venomous views that most of America would recoil from and would force Obama to disavow. And now, they too have disappeared.

Tony McPeak, one wonders…is he an “official” person with a title within the campaign? Because our entrenched media has developed a keen eye for digging into Gov. Palin’s child bearing activities, but not so much into the soft anti-Semitism and hard line antipathy of Tony McPeak, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Samantha Power, Anthony Lake, Susan Rice. McPeak spoke at one point, as if he was an inner circle member of the campaign…but perhaps all of these people, who were, at one time reported to be a part of the advisory, “do not hold official titles and are not advisors” at all, but merely folks who walk by the campaign headquarters and gain knowledge enough to speak by way of osmosis.

And Rashid Khalidi was quoted as saying the very same things that Jackson, Wright and Farrakhan seem to be so gleeful about. Khalidi said that Senator Obama told him that the good Senator had to repress his outward show of true feelings on the issue, so dear to Khalidi. Khalidi lionizes suicide bombers, much the way Wright, Pfleger, Moss and Meeks lionize Farrakhan’s hateful views of whites in general and those who practice that “gutter religion” in particular. Khalidi seemed to believe that after the election, Senator Obama’s “true” beliefs would come out. So did Jackson. So did Wright.

But none of them are “official” members of the official advisory team with official credentials and offical decoder rings apparently.

If indeed one chooses to believe that Senator Obama’s “dear friends” of two decades don’t know him as well as they say they do, that is is one’s prerogative. If one’s spiritual guide, one’s mentor, one’s life “advisor” doesn’t know the Senator as well as our ennui drenched media, then we should simply forget the issue as just a “distraction”.

With Ayers, Dorhn, Wright, Pfleger, Rashidi, Brzezinski, McPeak, Power, Moss, Meeks, Farrakhan, Klonski, Davidson, Lugar, Jackson, the New Party, ACORN, Frank Marshall Davis, the late Edward Said, Sam Graham-Felsen, Malley, NAFTA and the Canadians, …there certainly is much to ignore in Senator Obama’s campaign. Nothing to see here, move along.

I apologize for being distracted, I’ve been watching our Chuckie Cheese media play Whack A Mole and they apparently ask no quarters and give none in playing their game.

Oct 16, 2008 - 7:01 am 6. Pam:

If Barack Obama were a white man from Louisiana who spent the last twenty years at the feet of David Duke and who launched his political career in the living room of an unrepentant bomber of black churches, no one would consider him to be a serious candidate for president. No one. Because Barack Obama is black, from the north, and doesn’t eat funny food or have a funny accent, his monstrous bigotry is perfectly acceptable and understandable. It seems that Americans have such an astonishingly low opinion of black people that we don’t expect them to think in even a minimally civilized fashion.

I am an all American mutt. My first ancestors in the New World were here for the founding of the Jamestown Colony in 1607. A lot happens in 400 years. I have ancestors from nine different European countries plus North Africa (the black eyed Irish). I have Jewish ancestors and Native American ancestors on both sides. I am also from the South. I do not vote for people who hate me. It is deluded to think that someone who hates you will not hate you if you vote for him.

The various hate groups, white, black and IslamoNazi, hate each other to a great degree. However, no matter how much they may hate each other, they hate Jews more. That is their common ground: Jew hatred.

Oct 16, 2008 - 10:06 am 7. Bruce:

Dr. Chesler is quite right to point out this important omission from last night’s debate. It should have come up in the first debate, the one cut short and reoriented from foreign policy to largely about the economy.

Still, it’s easy to remember that only McCain has called militant Islam the “transcendental threat of our generation.” He’s absolutely right. Even the sick economy pales in comparison. But they are linked through oil and the recycling of oil dollars into jihad.

Oct 16, 2008 - 10:36 am 8. Helen Freedman:

I was painfully aware that the “camel in the room” was totally ignored. The threat of militant Islam never came up, even though it is at our doorstep. The voices in the wilderness will be drowned out as always, until the prophecies come true, and then people will ask in amazement, “How did it happen?” How does one then begin to explain the slow, deliberate, evil progress of a destructive force?

Oct 16, 2008 - 1:32 pm 9. Todd:

If we can’t stop the transition from English to Spanish in America, or stop the flow of illegals into the country, impeach corrupt politicians, or even stop the elite in the country from stealing a trillion dollars from taxes, what makes anyone think we can stop the muslims? This country is finished. The numbers add up, and the writing has been on the wall for more than a decade now. We’re seeing the transition from America to a new international land which will be free to anyone in the world. Wait until the peoples’ land plots are taken back from the Gov’t (for the benefit of the country)…Wait a minute,…They already started doing that.

America hasn’t seen anything yet. Just wait until Venezuela, Russia, and the Middle Eastern block move in and destroy us. And I hope no one expects France or Britain to come and save us. They’ll be too busy studying Islamic ideologies. Ask yourself one thing,…What’s more important, saving your country’s freedom or building up corruption in Israel?

Oct 16, 2008 - 3:25 pm 10. Gregory Hill:

It’s about the time for new blood. We the people have the
obliigation for We The People Convention soon!!!

Oct 16, 2008 - 3:46 pm 11. From Phyllis Chesler…”No One Talked About Jihad in the Last Great Debate” « Mind Mining…dig for knowledge:

[...] October 15th, 2008 10:04 pm [...]

Oct 16, 2008 - 5:32 pm 12. butch:

i suggest every one read the coran. there is no tolerance for anyone but muslim. no tolerance,no tolerance, learn it. it is time to pick up what we cling to and put it to use. pray about it later. they are here to bread us out. the left has prepared us to be more tolerent. but there is no tolerance, in there blood, for us, our beliefs, of freedom. i am a republican,13,14,15,amendments first and only party of freedom for all.NATIONAL BLACK REPUBLICAN ASSOCIATION.

Oct 16, 2008 - 6:29 pm 13. Dick:

Islam is a repressive, violent cult from the dark ages and needs to be weeded out of the west before it is too late. Get this garbage off our streets, get all the nonsense out f our schools and government. Our fathers fought for America’s freedom. We can’t let a bunch of smelly camel jockies take it away. Go Home Mo!

Oct 16, 2008 - 6:56 pm 14. Greg:

I was actually suprised the war on terror didn’t really come up but however the moderater did say that the topics were domestic and economic issues. So in that respect, both candidates kept the focus on what the general thesis of the debate points.

I think McCain did a far better job at the final debate than he did in the first two debates. I would have liked to see McCain swing harder on the final debate but whether or not that would have been wise is speculative. A huge firefight by McCain to Obama would have definetly pleased the conservative base but could have turned off the moderates. It was a fine line for McCain.

McCain could have used foreign policy and the war on terror in his closing statement and I think that would have been a fair injection given that the thesis of that particular debate was domestic and economical issues.

Oct 16, 2008 - 7:16 pm 15. Judy, NYC:

jay severin (spelling?) conservative political analyst 2 days ago reported on the joan hamburg a.m. radio show that jessie jackson speaking to a crowd in france promised that “under an obama administration the jews will be out of government”.
the nytimes today, october 17 contains an article in “world” headlined palestinian killed in west bank. further down it states the isreali army “says”, this man was holding a firebomb and was attempting to throw it. the article also prints remarks by palestinian Leaders who are outraged. quite the even handed appraisal. this follows constant focus on islamic issues in the main section of the times.
the unthinkable is upon us. it will be a long night. i am happy to know, however, that islamics use footbaths, they really do stink up the place.
i hope their supporters, obama and company does the same.

Oct 16, 2008 - 9:26 pm 16. John, Sartell, MN, USA:

Of course we can not constitutionally discriminate against ISLAM as a religion, BUT What if we consider ISLAM as a 1400 year old street gang, engaged in murder, extortion, robery, slavery, and the sexual abuse of minors?
If you don’t believe me read the KORAN and the HADITH.
As a gang we can deal with ISLAM as Mohamad’s gang under the federal RICO laws.

As a ‘theocracy’ a mosque is not a house of worship but a government office building and thus a legitimate military target.

Oct 16, 2008 - 9:58 pm 17. syedmdasadullah, syedmdasadullah@gmail.com:

Muslim Penchant for spinning state-sponsored conspiracies: Will it turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy?

But do we ever come across a word of gratitude, even gratitude expressed to God, for what “in practice already had become a Brahmin-dominated state” to have not gone the Pakistan way or the Islamic way?

Do we ever wonder what would be our situation if we were living as a religious minority in an Islamic state? Do we ever move our lips or lift our little finger in support of the religious minorities living in Islamic states next door? Well, what to support them, we have hounded out the one Muslim lady who dared to speak for them in Bangladesh? There are so many Hindus and even Hindu ladies who fight for our causes in this country: would we like the Indian system to hound them out of the country and of course, not get any refuge anywhere else, certainly not in a Muslim country? …

We have tens of thousands of mosques and madrasas running throughout the length and breadth of this country, but one of our mosques, a dilapidated and disused one, was demolished by people who were characterised by the Supreme Court as miscreants, and we blew that into an issue of our religious freedom in the country. We have still not solved that problem and allowed it to fester, to our nation’s detriment. Do our intellectuals take time off fighting the system and tell us it is not in our interest to allow a cancer to grow. The mosque is gone. We apparently don’t worship bricks and soil. Bricks too are gone in any case. Why can’t we initiate an amicable solution, as it would be in our own interest too? We need a plot of land to pray, we can pray anywhere in the area. Why do we need to blow it out of all proportion, make it such a big issue, when the country – the system – is allowing us to have as many mosques and madrasas as we wish?

An analysis by Sultan Shahin, editor, NewAgeIslam.com
9 Comments More.

http://www.newageislam.com/ArticleDetail.aspx?ArticleID=877

Oct 17, 2008 - 2:17 am 18. Destined For Destruction:

It is interesting to read these comments. Well aware of those who see this threat coming …Well actually already here…. I would suggest that as well as reading the Koran anyone who needs an insight should look to biblical prophesy and look into their heart as a true believer in the One TRUE God! These times could not be more telling then the very words that have foretold them. In your heart of hearts each one who truely believes in GOD knows that these times have been foretold so should it come as a surprise to any that believe in GOD and His word that even now the destroyer is even now amoung us making clear the path for who else but the Great deceiver who cometh next?
The armies of the world are even now being gathered in one place where it all began even unto the rivers Tigress and Euphrates where Babylon is.
Should it then also come as a surprise that anger against the Israeli people be rekindled?
If you do not support Israel, Gods people, even with all their faults, who do you support and what ground is there left to stand on?
Should this very nation founded and raised up by God, friend to Israel, now turn their back upon God and His people?
If so shall not God in His anger turn His back upon this nation?
Of course Jessie Jackson should say the Zionists will lose alot of influence. The time is now. The hour is near! To explain –If a blackman is elected to the office of president of the United States of America then America can no longer be declared to be a racial nation so those who created and stayed in their positions blaming race to be black against the white will now chose a race against whom they can turn to keep their now defunkt power that was gained through keeping the race issue alive in this country. Who else but the Jews? And should God abandon the Jews? I tell you he shall not! And if this country abandons both God and His people it shall indeed be at our own peril!

Oct 17, 2008 - 5:29 am 19. Hildegard Christiansen:

If I hear one more time that Obama was eloquent and kept his cool during the debate, I will break something. Don’t you hear the hollow sound of this tin-man? What about his stumbling, studdering? Listening to him is a chore. Is that eloquence? He kept his cool? Yeah, because he is a conman. He looked more like a little boy being lectured by his father. …. And that arrogant smurk – trying to mask how he does’nt know a thing.
And yesterday he was complaining in New Hampshire about negative ads.
Getting beat up in the schoolyard little pretty boy? And you want to be commander in chief?

Oct 17, 2008 - 6:13 am 20. Matt:

Supporters of Islam continually label anti-islamists as oppressors of religion. This is false. Islam is not a religion, but an oppressive theocracy guided by the Muslim religion. I was surprised and disappointed to see that McCain did not mention Obama’s campaigning for Odinga who wishes to rule with Sharia law. Campaigning in that fashion sure looks to me like treason. Supporters of Communism, Socialism, or Islamic Law have no right to sit in American political positions.
They pledged “and to the Republic for which it stands”

Oct 17, 2008 - 6:46 am 21. mikeyh0:

Three of us share a cab as drivers. One is a Jew, one a Muslim and I am a Christian. How can this be? THINK ABOUT IT!!! Let hate rule you and it doesn’t matter your “faith”.

Oct 17, 2008 - 7:15 am 22. ArtinChicago:

Islam is not a tolerant religion. It is a war-mongering hate-group hiding under “sheets” and the GUISE of religion.

It should be as easy for a Christian American to accept the allegations of Islam (which by the way, means Surrender)as it would be for an African-American to accept the the allegations of the Ku Klux Klan (which also lide and hid under the cross burning guise of Christianity). We all know who the senators and representatives are that are working against our rights, democracy and freedom of choice. Now let us use the 2nd Ammendment for what it was meant to be used for; “the Security of a Free State”.

Oct 17, 2008 - 7:22 am 23. Rico:

The only thing McCain was concerned about was Joe 6 pack and Joe the plumber. Pathetic! Nit to mention character questions. Obama was not able to muster enough gumph to fight back. AT least he tried to keep on the issues.

Oct 17, 2008 - 9:57 am 24. anita:

Since neither candidate will stick up for the folks, can we, the people, gather ourselves and sue the government for corruption? Can we lead our own investigation of who stole our money? Can we impeach those who were involved? Can we make every elected official give back any money that Freddy and Fannie gave them for their campaigns?

We the people, want justice

Oct 17, 2008 - 10:24 am 25. Lauren:

Phyllis, I knew IMMEDIATELY when he brought up Lugar that he was one of the most anti-Israel senators. I’m rather shocked to learn you didn’t or that McCain didn’t point that out either. Maybe McCain realizes most people in our country don’t care about what happens to the Jews anymore.

Oct 17, 2008 - 12:05 pm 26. Robert:

They didnt focus in on “Jihad” because it was a debate about domestic issues. They discussed Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Israel and Iran in the first debate.

Like it or not, terrorism is off the table as a domestic issue. Its all about the economy now. Good or bad, thats the truth.

Oct 17, 2008 - 12:41 pm 27. Albert:

It should be clear to everybody by now that the left has infiltrated the key institutions of this country to the point where they are using its “democracy” to destroy it. In such a situation only a fool would still believe in the democratic process. No, what we need is for Americans to take up arms and take the country back. Ideally the armed forces should march into washington, as well as wall st., and arrest all the corrupt gangsters and execute them. Declare martial law, arrest the enemies in the media,aclu, public schools, colleges and big corporations and execute them. This will save the american PEOPLE. If they fail to do so then it will be left for the american people to fight, and they may then be at odds with the military or those in the military without the balls to desert, which would be a shame. One can go ahead, sit on the sofa and whine about how America is disappearing but that will accomplish as much as voting-which is absolutely nothing.The system is rigged against us but bullets aren’t travel in one direction-where one aims.

Oct 17, 2008 - 8:57 pm 28. Ronald:

Ok, I get it. We are in DANGER. DANGER DANGER DANGER. And so the question must be asked: what are we going to do about it? Post comments on line about how much danger we are in? Protest? Not vote? Vote for the lesser of two useless tools? If that is your plan then just convert now because you will not make a difference.

At what point is the use of violence to fix things the best option? I will tell you when. When its TOO LATE.

We are fighting enemnies (domestic and foriegn) that are already using violence to get their way and we play nice. Gee, I wonder how long this strategery will work for us. I suppose that when we work full time for The State and we bow to Mecca 5 times a day we will finally know we lost. Or will we? Or will we have reconciled ourselves to our fate and justified our conversion and submission in our minds and actually believe it was the right thing to do?

Oct 18, 2008 - 9:22 am 29. bbloom:

Unfortunately,comments 27 & 28 or right on target ( yes the pun is intentional ). This is why I have said all along in this election we all lose. We are bound for social unrest that can only become the next civil war. The odds are against us. Jews maintain the ” concentration camp ” mentality. If we are tolerant, they won’t really kill us. They did ! They are ! They will !
As a “child of the South”, I was always ill at ease with the whole “love thine enemies mentality. It was ultimately the downfall of my attempt to live in Israel. Islam is a plauge upon humanity. I thank HaShem that there are people willing to fight. Every day is an uneasy struggle in Israel. It will only be a short time for us here. I will ” take my stand ” in Dixie. It may be taking awhile for Americans to wake up, but when we do I don’t think we will be easy to conquer.

Oct 19, 2008 - 7:50 am 30. Lauren:

Phyllis, Have you seen this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8QcpdUtxNQ

Would you consider posting it? I’ve been saying for a while that I am scared to death of this man. The more I find out the less I feel anyone can call me paranoid about it.

Oct 19, 2008 - 6:04 pm 31. Will the Right attempt to do to Obama what they did to Clinton? - Page 4 - US Message Board:

[...] Sued Citibank Under CRA to Force it to Make Bad Loans | Media Circus HYMAN: Obama’s Kenya ghosts Chesler Chronicles No One Talked About Jihad in the Last Great Debate Obama Crimes Today in Investor’s Business Daily stock analysis and business news Obama’s Syrian [...]

Oct 22, 2008 - 11:45 am 32. Courage and the Long War against Islamic Supremacism and Jihad (Part 2 of 2) « ACT!For America — Northern Virginia & DC Metro Chapter:

[...] killings” and abuses happen in America. We must develop coalitions with leaders such as Phyllis Chesler and women’s rights organizations in coordinating the campaign against Islamic [...]

Feb 8, 2009 - 12:03 pm 33. The Long War against Islamic Supremacism and Jihad « Islam: Human Rights, Spiritualism, Rethinking Islam, Jihad…:

[...] killings" and abuses happen in America. We must develop coalitions with leaders such as Phyllis Chesler and women’s rights organizations in coordinating the campaign against Islamic [...]

Aug 8, 2009 - 10:33 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: