Chesler Chronicles

December 4th, 2008 2:56 pm

The Electronic Jihadist: A Brief Conversation With Dr. Nancy H. Kobrin.

One of my favorite people came by: Dr. Nancy Kobrin, with whom I have written articles (you may read some of them, Here, Here, Here, and Here) and whose work I adore. Dr. Nancy is an Arabist and psycho-analyst whose book about terrorism was once in press at Looseleaf Law, a publisher of law enforcement and counter-terrorism titles. At the last minute, the publisher rejected the work because he was honestly afraid that he would not be able to adequately protect his staff from bomb threats, riots, or lawsuits. How very fragile our political speech turns out to be! This happened long before the brou-ha-ha over the The Jewel of Medina. Whenever we’re together we mean to relax and to even engage in “small” talk–but we never do. Thus, here we are, talking, at our most relaxed.

PC: Welcome Nancy! Tell me, when is your book coming out?

NK: The book has been completely edited. One new publisher, The Center for the Study of Political Islam, has expressed serious interest. I am very optimistic.

PC: Yes, that’s Bill Warner’s rather excellent publishing house. They publish very thoughtful and important titles with no authorial byline. Your byline might be their first. They have been publishing a major series about “political Islam.” Their titles include: Mohammed’s Life, the Sira ; The Traditions of Mohammed-the Hadith; The Koran; and The Submission of Women and Slaves. They have also just released a Self Study Course on Political Islam which also exists as a c.d. (What a great idea!)

NK: Bill Warner is the only one that I know who has done a statistical analysis of the Qu’ran in terms of ideological topics.

PC: Remind us, what is the name of your book?

NK: The Sheikh’s New Clothes. The Naked Truth About Islamic Suicide Terrorism. One wonders whether a reticent publishing world will be willing to change post the Mumbai massacre.

PC: It might make them even more reticent and yet such acts of horror might also act to firm up our resolve.

NK: It seems more than ever that we have to go to a deeper level of analysis in order to understand the psychology of extremism and the gender issues involved in terrorism. Both India and Pakistan are shame and honor cultures. The “Jew” is the ultimate female, the ultimate “other” in the Muslim unconscious. Initially, this massacre was referred to as the “Mum” attacks. Is this a reference to “mother” in British, so to speak? And is the psychological motive involved an anti-colonialist and anti-woman motif? Can’t let her go, can’t live with her either?

PC: Granted that we know very little about them, still, what do you make of these Mumbai terrorists?

NK: As you know my book deals with the imagery and the psychology of Muslim terrorist attacks. The imagery of Mumbai reminds me of a very violent video game. This is what I call an “E-jihadi” phenomenon. These jihadists are addicted to violence and violent videos. They are also recruited via the internet. It reveals an enormous deficit in their ability to relate to people in a healthy way. They relate only through violence.

PC: Thank you Nancy.

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

4 Comments

1. sisterrosetta:

Ms. Chesler,

Just a note to let you know that I appreciate very much your contributions.

And I look forward to the notices you send me of your latest effort.

Thank you.

Dec 4, 2008 - 3:28 pm 2. Norman Simms:

Good to see you and Nancy together.
If we support one another, as you two do, that’s a start really towards tikkun ha’olam.

Norman

Dec 4, 2008 - 3:37 pm 3. George Jochnowitz:

Every 20 or 30 or 50 years, a major chunk of the world goes crazy. Eugene Ionesco called this “rhinoceritis” and wrote a play, RHINOCEROS, about it. We are living through such a period at the moment. Our current form of rhinoceritis is centered in the world of Islam and is focused on the question of Israel. Terrorists are engaged in destructive acts that can succeed in killing people but can in no way aid their cause, whatever it may be. 9/11 was such an event. It couldn’t have done anything to strengthen Islam; instead, it brought about the displacement of the Taliban from Kabul and northern Afghanistan. Nevertheless, Islamists are proud of it. They say it was a skillfully performed triumph. At the same time, they say the Jews did it. They see no contradiction. The recent murders in Mumbai, like 9/11, were carried out professionally and successfully but can in no way serve the ends of the perpetrators—unless their only aim was murder for its own sake.

Dec 4, 2008 - 6:11 pm 4. BL:

Drs. Chesler and Kobrin,

Over the years, your individual and collective efforts have provided so much enlightment to me, imagine my surprise when I read this morning in the free METRO NY newspaper an article about “The Social Terrorists.” You two are so cutting edge, it blows my mind!

“Ten years ago, when Dr. Gabriel Weismann, a communcations professor at the University of Haifa, started monitoring terrorist Web sites, there were 12. Today they are at least 6,850.”

Bull’s eye, you hit the nail on the head, and guess what, the “social” in the article’s title, does not mean “social” in a healthy way as Dr. Kobrin pointed out. It means “social” in the KKK way. You can get answers to your questions about how to be an unhealthy, disconnected, sociopathetic pycho-bomber from real life “terrorists, online. Access plans on how to hold to a “terrorist” attack in your community, ad nausium!

Yet, when a violent video game (I don’t even play Solitaire) is launched where killing terrorists (yes, they happen to be Muslim: the ones who play the violent games where you kill Jews and Christians), there’s an uproar from the “faux moderate Muslim” community. Go figure.

What an excellent tie in to your previous post, “Take Them At Their Word Before It’s Too Late.”

If there is a bright side, the article talks about how one radical group is trying to kill the web masters of another radical group.

Keep on keeping on, you guys are spot on!

Dec 4, 2008 - 7:45 pm

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: