Comments on: Nonie Darwish: “The Non-Muslim World Must Have No Illusions.”

By: David Adetona

David Adetona — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:39:52 +0000

Dear brethren,
calvary greetings to you in the name of our Lord Jesus christ. During the process of surfing the web, i came across your crusade which is holding towards the ending of this year.i will be very glad to make two of our church anoited men of God to be partaker of the powerful crusade. I will be very glad to recieve your response,thanks and God bless everyone of us in the name of christ our Lord.

yours faithfully,
Pastor David Adetona,
General overseer.

By: Nicolas Krebs

Nicolas Krebs — Sat, 09 May 2009 15:37:45 +0000

"Europe has morphed in to Eurabia" (Fern Sidman) No, except in the mind of conspiracy theorists and Europeans-haters.

By: Gaza and Sharia « PurpleSlog

Gaza and Sharia « PurpleSlog — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:32:11 +0000

[...] The reasons for choosing violence over peace is due to Sharia. Mainstream Sharia books define Jihad as: “to war against non-Muslims to establish the religion.” (Shafi’i Sharia 09.0). Jihad is not just the duty of the individual Muslim, it is also the main duty of the Muslim head of State (the Calipha): “A Muslim calipha is entrusted to take his people into war and command offensive and aggressive Jihad. He must organize Jihad against any non-Muslim government. [Link: PJ Media] [...]

By: Book review by Phyllis Chesler on Nonie Darwish’s new book on sharia law | Vlad Tepes

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:11:17 +0000

[...] Author Nonie Darwish on Gaza and on the “Terrifying Global Implications of Sharia Law. Gazan-Egyptian, Nonie Darwish, well known as a “Muslim Shahid’s daughter,” (her father died in battle against the Israelis), is an amazingly brave woman who, unsurprisingly, writes amazingly brave books. Her first book, Now They Call me Infidel. Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel, and the War on Terror was first published in 2006. She is also the founder of the organization Arabs for Israel. [...]

By: Chaz

Chaz — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:55:35 +0000

May I clear things up concerning the comments on the Vatican:
1) It is true that some popes were waging wars! Some for just causes, others for causes not so just.
2) The crusades were a response to Islamic Aggression. Most notably in Spain and France where the Castellans and Franks respectively had to turn back the Moors. The only way to stop them was (ironically enough!) to bring the fight to their front door (and if any of this sounds familiar, congratulations!).
3) The crusades were done when most of Europe was Catholic.
4) There was no way whatsoever that the crusades would’ve worked if Individual nations were to try the same thing.
5) it wasn’t until a while later (when protestant religions started popping up) that the Vatican tried to re-impose Catholicism on unwilling nations. In particular the Spanish Armada (Spain vs England) and Germany’s 30 years war come to mind.

By: South America « Sake White

South America « Sake White — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:48:19 +0000

[...] particularly good look at Islam comes from an insider. Gazan-Egyptian, Nonie Darwish, well known as a “Muslim Shahid’s daughter,” (her father died [...]

By: Gail

Gail — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:42:51 +0000

Phyllis, this lady is speaking truth which many want to ignore. I pray that ears and hearts be receptive to her wisdom and her words! She is spot on!!

My heart is grateful to you and to her for telling truths most do not want to hear. May God go before you both and prepare the hearts and minds of those who are fortunate enough to hear truths!

Many Blessings to You, my Friend,
Gail

By: David Ross

David Ross — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:47:08 +0000

7 John Galt, the Vatican has never sought political domination over the whole world.

The ideal state of affairs from a Vatican perspective would be a mosaic of independent states who ignored religion and whose citizens all went to Mass voluntarily. Failing that last, the Vatican has settled for alliances with princes who have established Catholicism, or at least promise to protect the Church against interference from powerful monarchs like (usually) the King of France.

The Vatican has on occasion attempted political domination over central Italy, but this it did in order to stave off interference by France, Sicily, various northern citystates and finally Austria. The biggest supporters of this policy were the Borgias who weren’t even Italian.

(I’m leaving aside that in the Vatican you’re picking a small and unrepresentative sect of Christianity from a Dark Age perspective. In those days most Christians were Asian Nestorians under Arab or Turkish rule. I somewhat agree that they don’t matter, because their policy turned out to be a total failure compared to that of the Vatican.)

By: Idler

Idler — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:15:23 +0000

While this is true today, Christianity via the Vatican during the Dark and Middle ages sought world domination and total control over the private lives of each individual.

How did Christianity seek world domination during the Dark and Middle Ages? Colonialism came later. During that period Christians were mainly fighting (and usually losing to) Islamic expansion, from Syria to Iberia. Also, is there really anything in Christianity analogous to Sharia? Christian countries had a tradition of a legal separation between the spiritual and temporal spheres.

By: Almost Ali

Almost Ali — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:51:04 +0000

With the election of Barack Obama, our conversion to Sharia is all but complete.

Ironic, too, because just when the we needed a lion, we got a lamb. A hope-born goat leading American Gothic to the slaughter.