I grew up believing that the “truth” of a matter really existed and that, in the words of the immortal John Keats, that “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,–that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.” (See below for Keats’ Ode on a Grecian Urn).
Well, to some, Keats is just one more dead, white man. Today, the intellectual elite and their followers believe that truth does not exist; that there are many truths and isms; that everything is relative, Rashomon-like; that people have different points of view and that all such views are “equal.”
In addition, people have been taught to worship lies, paranoid projections, linguistic reversals, and photo shopped images. False accusations are mass produced and continue to pass for sweet truth in every language under the sun: Israelis are “Nazis” who killed 12 year-old Mohammed al-Dura in his father’s arms, perpetrated a “massacre” in Jenin, built an “Apartheid” Wall in the West Bank, are presiding over a “Holocaust” in Gaza.
If anyone thinks these are just words, no harm done, everyone is entitled to their opinion, please note that the entire world “cares” about Gaza and Palestine like no other places on earth. It makes sense. In the last month, the New York Times often published two articles a day, accompanied by large photos, about Gaza. They also simultaneously featured op-ed pieces, editorials, and letters on Gaza in the very same issue.
The same mainstream media that once wrote about the alleged “massacre” in Jenin, has now spread the lie that more than 1,000 Gazans, including many women and children, were killed by Israelis in battle. Now, too late for the world’s brief attention span, we learn that no more than 600 Gazans died, and that they were mainly Hamas warriors dressed as civilians, not civilians, not women and children. My God! Compare that to the daily death tolls in Darfur and Congo and you will understand how very yellow this journalism truly is.
Once, barbarians ate their enemies’ hearts in order to incorporate their power. Today’s barbarians assert that they are the victims, thus hoping to incorporate the moral stature of those whom they envy, defame, and victimize. How can a “victim” be a victimizer?
Over the weekend, I published a piece about Douglas Murray’s dis-invitation as a moderator by the London School of Economics. Now, several commentators ( see comments 18, 31, and 32 for examples) suggest that the matter was really more… complicated, that LSE was not exactly, precisely, in the wrong. But is this true?
Based on my own experience with how Cambridge University dis-invited me but then denied having done so, and based on what Douglas has told me, I think not. Thus, once world media attention took note of the dis-invitation, the London School of Terrorism and Appeasement tried to cover their sorry ass exposure. According to Douglas Murray:
“The LSE has been desperately trying to firefight since the press here started on them. They even tried to ‘re-invite’ me an hour and a half before the event started. All their earliest media responses are different from the later ones when they tried to pretend there was no problem. They were caught off guard by the amount of media interest and decided to try to come up with a new ‘narrative’. Pretty pusillanimous from a university, or to be expected!
Their press officer has been in a terrible spin and has been writing to blogs and papers everywhere. But the Telegraph and Evening Standard here saw the original emails (which I’m very happy to send to you too) dis-inviting for all the reasons shown in the original press reports
Of course the LSE actually IS a hot-bed of radicalism and has repeatedly produced terrorists – not least the murderer of Daniel Pearl. Each time they are revealed to be a hot-bed of extremism they express embarrassment at the information becoming public knowledge – but never do a thing to change the situation. See here for another recent example.”
In terms of Cambridge: A few years ago, I was invited by the Womens’ Studies/Gender Studies program to deliver one of four keynote speeches at an international conference marking their tenth anniversary. To their credit, they said that I had made quite a good case in my book The Death of Feminism. What’s Next In the Struggle for Womens’ Freedom. I was amazed and pleased and immediately agreed to come. Then, I reviewed who the other speakers would be and realized that I would be the “token” critic of Islamic gender and religious apartheid and the token pro-American, pro-Israel, and pro-Western democracy voice. (By the way, these are the very views which now render me a “conservative.” Forty years ago, I was considered a “radical” for many of these same concerns.)
I stressed that I would come, one way or the other, but asked them to review the possible need for campus security. They promptly dis-invited me–but only to the international conference. They were canny enough to write that in the future, I would be welcome to address a small, non-international group. Of course, I’ve never heard from them again.
According to Murray, “Also – the current line the LSE is trying to pursue is that the particular international circumstances made it impossible this time, but that on other occasions (during peacetime?) I would be allowed on campus again. It’s worth noting what ‘normal’ circumstances at the LSE are.
I spoke to the Jewish Society at LSE last term. The Islamic society there heard of my visit and threatened the J-Soc with various things they said would happen if I came. The J-Soc held firm. They invited the I-Soc to attend. The talk passed peacefully and no member of the I-Soc even tried to challenge me. A few of them merely sat in silence and recorded the event without asking permission (presumably hoping I was going to say something they could then object to: of course they were disappointed).
However – the next issue of the LSE student newspaper contained a front-page article dictated by the I-Soc with all of their propaganda, libelling me in most grotesque way: accusing me of ‘Islamophobia’ and ‘racism’ among other allegations. I wrote to the editors, journalists and head of LSE warning them that unless they printed a full front-page retraction immediately I would sue them for libel. The next issue duly contained a full and complete retraction.
This is what going to LSE during ‘normal’ circumstances consists of. Going last week whilst feelings are ‘inflamed’ by Israeli actions turns out to be impossible for a friend of Israel. If I were them I would spend more time cracking down on Islamist students who practice intimidation and rather less time trying to spin and lie about events relating to visiting speakers. ”
This is not just happening in London or England or Europe. I want Americans to realize that our campuses are also under siege. Islamists and Marxist-Leninists, with lots of Wahabi, Saudi funding, have taken them over. Their Palestinianized point of view prevails. The dis-invitations are happening here too–as are the non-invitations. And, the rage of the Muslim and pro-Palestinian pro-”peace” marchers is very frightening. In London over the weekend, (very much like the marches for Gaza across America), a march on the Israeli Embassy turned ugly. As I watched it, I could hear one of the marchers clearly screaming: “Police brutality” over and over again. The marchers were attacking the unarmed police and one of their leaders made sure to claim victim status.
How long dear God, how long, will the world continue to fall for such tricks, persist in believing that Islamist and Marxist Lies are true?
Ode on a Grecian Urn
By John Keats
Thou still unravished bride of quietness!
Thou foster-child of silence and slow time,
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
A flow’ry tale more sweetly than our rhyme:
What leaf-fringed legend haunts about thy shape
Of deities or mortals, or of both,
In Tempe or the dales of Arcady?
What men or gods are these? What maidens loth?
What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?
What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy?
Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
Not to the sensual ear, but, more endeared,
Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone:
Fair youth, beneath the trees, thou canst not leave
Thy song, nor ever can those trees be bare;
Bold Lover, never, never canst thou kiss,
Though winning near the goal -yet, do not grieve;
She cannot fade, though thou hast not thy bliss,
For ever wilt thou love, and she be fair!
Ah, happy, happy boughs! that cannot shed
Your leaves, nor ever bid the Spring adieu;
And, happy melodist, unwearied,
For ever piping songs for ever new;
More happy love! more happy, happy love!
For ever warm and still to be enjoyed,
For ever panting and for ever young;
All breathing human passion far above,
That leaves a heart high-sorrowful and cloyed,
A burning forehead, and a parching tongue.
Who are these coming to the sacrifice?
To what green altar, O mysterious priest,
Lead’st thou that heifer lowing at the skies,
And all her silken flanks with garlands drest?
What little town by river or sea-shore,
Or mountain-built with peaceful citadel,
Is emptied of its folk, this pious morn?
And, little town, thy streets for evermore
Will silent be; and not a soul to tell
Why thou art desolate, can e’er return.
O Attic shape! Fair attitude! with brede
Of marble men and maidens overwrought,
With forest branches and the trodden weed;
Thou, silent form, dost tease us out of thought
As doth eternity: Cold pastoral!
When old age shall this generation waste,
Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou sayst,
“Beauty is truth, truth beauty, -that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.”
PJM Home
Woman's Inhumanity to Woman
The Death of Feminism: What’s Next in the Struggle for Women’s Freedom
Women and Madness
The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It
Women of the Wall: Claiming Sacred Ground at Judaism’s Holy Site
Letters to a Young Feminist
With Child: A Diary of Motherhood
Feminist Foremothers in Women’s Studies, Psychology, and Mental Health
Patriarchy: Notes of an Expert Witness
Sacred Bond: The Legacy of Baby M
Mothers on Trial: The Battle for Children and Custody
About Men
Women, Money & Power
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
9 Comments
1. George Jochnowitz:There is nothing as beaitiful as a fact. In order to establish what is fact, we need science—research, testing, reconsidering—and democracy, the freedom to discuss and debate. Democracy is the political realization of the scientific method, as I always say.
Jan 26, 2009 - 1:55 pm 2. jj mollo:I think it is fair to evaluate the various version of Truth in light of Deeds and Accomplishments. The problem with Palestine is that the stark contrast is too much for Arab culture to bear. The distinction is corroborated throughout the world where some societies grow rich and free, but others linger in medieval poverty. Increasingly desperate versions of the Truth must be employed in defense of a clearly flawed social paradigm.
Jan 26, 2009 - 6:47 pm 3. Dave:The Palestinians need to be Judacized, civilized and uplifted for some 30 to 40 years. Then maybe they will be capable of some form of rational self-government. They do not come close right now.
And their loud-mouthed supporters in academia and the media? Self-hating Americans/westerners. I wish I could call them out.
Jan 26, 2009 - 11:41 pm 4. cfbleachers:Phyllis, you are a lovely woman with a huge heart. When I am asked what I think the terrorists will do to strike at us next, I always tell good people that they are incapable of thinking with enough evil to contemplate it. You can’t think as these folks do, Phyllis…because your frame of reference comes from good, not evil.
You regard the truth as a precious commodity to be protected and preserved. There are people in this world, and unfortunately…now in our information stream, who regard it as a trifling thing, to be bent to their whim in order to deliver a “message” rather than facts.
Israel and America share a common denominator in this assault on honesty. They are perpetual victims of slander, fraud and distortion.
You, Phyllis…as a person of fundamental goodness, see individuals assigned to act as guardians of our information stream, to be holding a quasi-public trust. One that must remain sacrosanct and placed above all political persuasions, individual agendas and party affiliations.
Those days are long gone, Phyllis. The entrenched media minions and their morally bankrupt editors treat the truth with the ethics of a medieval bazaar. Instead of selling their wares by intentional deceit, they twist, bend and corrupt the truth for the sake of the message. They sacrifice the truth on the altar of leftism.
You expect that they will respond with guilt, shame or some long lost remnant of conscience when confronted with evidence of their crimes. You can’t shame a person or an institution of persons that has/have no conscience, Phyllis.
They know they are lying and they don’t care. They know they are gang raping the information stream, and that is their intention, that is the point of their existence.
They intend to shape opinion based upon a pack of lies. It is the shaping of the opinion to meet their worldview, their beliefs, their whims… that is paramount. And they cannot do so, if they were to tell the truth. The truth is not on their side.
All of the issues, every one of them…depends upon honest reflection of actual facts, for an opinion to have substance. If an opinion is formed and held based upon a pack of lies and distortions, it isn’t worth the breath it takes to pronounce it.
When the stolen information stream gang rapists “win over” the sheep and feeble-minded, they have done so by casting faux pearls before swine, who wallow in their ignorance, believing it to be wisdom and nuance.
Who are these people who arrogate to themselves the right to rape my information stream right before our very eyes? How dare they decide that the truth is theirs to trifle with and keep from me? Every issue depends upon truth and facts, every one. Therefore, those who steal the truth and facts for their own vile distortions are traitors to the people. I would hang every one of them from the highest tree in the land…if only…we could get at the truth they have stolen.
Jan 27, 2009 - 9:43 am 5. Markus:“Democracy is the political realization of the scientific method, as I always say.”
But with the scientific method, there is one truth that one is seeking, facts to be established. Whereas political decisions just as often involve opinions and preferences, based on innate difference in background and points of view. Are you suggesting there is one “true” position for issues like, say, abortion or immigration, that ALL objectively minded people would take, regardless of whether they were Catholic or Jewish, recent immigrant or otherwise?
Jan 27, 2009 - 12:44 pm 6. George Jochnowitz:Markus,
Answers may never be found, both in science and in politics. The method remains the same: searching, finding evidence and testing it, keeping one’s mind open. Dennis Overbye had an article about science and democracy in the science section of yesterday’s New York Times. It sounded very much like things I say in my book, THE BLESSED HUMAN RACE.
Jan 28, 2009 - 8:20 am 7. joeblough:I begin to think that our outlook is too rosy — that the things we hope to eliminate are simply part of the human condition.
We may get relief, for periods of time, in particular regions or places, but ultimately all of the old irrationalities and evils will raise their head again.
While it may be the first time some of us have seen this sort of stuff with our own eyes, it is certainly not the first time it has happened. Nor is there any reason to expect that it will be the last.
Like anything else rooted in biology, and we certainly are that, human civilization requires constant tending to survive and remain healthy. The destructive forces of nature, and we can certainly count irrationality as one of those, will continue to act.
Food rots. Gardens revert to weeds and chaos. And humans turn stupid and mad.
There is an interesting, if unproven, hypothesis out there about the origins of cancer — that in point of fact, our bodies are producing mutated, defective cancerous cells all the time, but that normally they are eliminated by the immune system. And what we call cancer is actually an immune deficiency.
It is certainly a fact that a baby born today is more or less identical with any savage baby born 10 thousand years ago. Normally they get civilized. But even under the best of circumstances a few criminals slip through and actually act on their criminal impulses.
It seems to me that our civilizational defenses are fatigued.
The oldest spiritual enemies of man are awake and walking the world, ignorance and envy, tribalism and power-lust, self-delusion and deceit, cowardice and the thirst for blood.
No philosopher has ever found a way to eliminate these forces and their periodic resurgence.
There is nothing for it but to gird our loins for battle, so to speak. And remember that men have defeated these evils before.
What one man can do, another can do.
Keep the faith.
Jan 28, 2009 - 6:35 pm 8. akhter:A reader wrote:
Dear Mr. Shamir,
I had the following letter from a friend in the U S, and if there is anyone who can help me with the TRUE dates, numbers and facts I am sure it will be you…first I thought why would I want to bother with someone like that? but then I thought these are the types who are poisoning the American mind. I know you have much more important things to follow on than this, but if you can give me some facts about the points that he mentions I would really appreciate it.
God bless you and keep your “voice of truth and wisdom” roaring in this deaf world.
An ardent reader of your articles and books
Sincerely
Ibrahim
The following is the letter, I am sure some points are going to make you just as mad as they made me….thanks again….Ibrahim
SUBJECT: JERUSALEM
1. **ISRAEL** BECAME A STATE IN 1312 B.C., TWO MILLENNIA BEFORE ISLAM;
Wrong. A princedom called Israel came to existence 500 years later, and it had no relation to the ‘Jews’ who appeared a millennium later. ‘Jews’ are not even mentioned in the Torah of Moses, only in the very late books of Esther and Ezra. Islam, or belief in One God, was established by Abraham/Ibrahim a millennium earlier, while Muhammad just returned to its roots.
2. ARAB REFUGEES FROM **ISRAEL** BEGAN CALLING THEMSELVES
“PALESTINIANS” IN 1967, TWO DECADES AFTER (MODERN) ISRAELI STATEHOOD;
Wrong. The native dwellers of Palestine were called “Palestinians” by Herodotes in 5th century BC, 2500 years before (modern) Israeli statehood; but Herodotes never heard of Jews, though he walked across the whole land. Jews appeared three hundred years later.
3. AFTER CONQUERING THE LAND IN 1272 B.C., JEWS RULED IT FOR A THOUSAND YEARS AND MAINTAINED A CONTINUOUS PRESENCE THERE FOR 3,300 YEARS;
Wrong. The Jews conquered the land in 168 BC and ruled it for 100 years until Palestine was liberated by the Roman general Pompey the Great for they killed and pillaged the natives overmuch. Another 100 years later, there was not a single Jew in Jerusalem.
4. THE ONLY ARAB RULE FOLLOWING CONQUEST IN 633 B.C. LASTED JUST 22 YEARS;
Wrong. King Herod (1st century BC) was as full-blooded Arab as Omar ibn Hattab (7th century AD) and as the Mayor of united Jerusalem, Ragheb Nashashibi in 20th century.
5. FOR OVER 3,300 YEARS, **JERUSALEM** WAS THE JEWISH CAPITAL. IT WAS NEVER THE CAPITAL OF ANY ARAB OR MUSLIM ENTITY. EVEN UNDER JORDANIAN RULE,
Wrong. Jerusalem was the capital of Jews for 100 years (2nd – 1st century BC), and it was the capital of Christian Kingdom for 100 years, and a capital of a Muslim and Christian province for 1900 years, while it was the holy place of pilgrimage for all its history.
(EAST) **JERUSALEM** WAS NOT MADE THE CAPITAL, AND NO ARAB LEADER CAME TO VISIT IT;
Jerusalem was the centre of pilgrimage, and Arab, Muslim and Christian leaders came to venerate there, until being forbidden to enter by the Jews, while [first PM] David Ben Gurion went to New York before he came to visit Jerusalem, and [first President] Haim Weitzman hated the city.
6. **JERUSALEM** IS MENTIONED OVER 700 TIMES IN THE BIBLE, BUT NOT ONCE IS IT MENTIONED IN THE QUR’AN;
Wrong. Jerusalem is not mentioned in the Torah of Moses even once, while there are thousands of Muslim stories about Jerusalem, and Jerusalem is the place of Crucifixion and Resurrection of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
7. KING DAVID FOUNDED **JERUSALEM**; MOHAMMED NEVER SET FOOT IN IT;
Wrong. Jerusalem was founded six hundred years before King David, who was a Muslim prophet and ancestor of Christ anyway, and the Prophet Muhammad prayed there in his praying place, while one of the most important events in life of Muhammad (al-Miraj) took place in Jerusalem as described in Koran. Jewish connection to King David? They bombed this hotel!
8. JEWS PRAY FACING **JERUSALEM**; MUSLIMS FACE **MECCA**. IF THEY ARE BETWEEN THE TWO CITIES, MUSLIMS PRAY FACING **MECCA**, WITH THEIR BACKS TO **JERUSALEM**;
Christians and Muslims venerate God in Jerusalem, Jews crucified Him there.
9. IN 1948, ARAB LEADERS URGED THEIR PEOPLE TO LEAVE, PROMISING TO CLEANSE THE LAND OF JEWISH PRESENCE. 68% OF THEM FLED WITHOUT EVER SETTING EYES ON AN ISRAELI SOLDIER;
In 2006, Jewish leaders did not ask their people to leave, but 70% of them ran away from the North in fear of Hizbollah missiles without ever setting eyes on a Lebanese guerrilla.
10. VIRTUALLY THE ENTIRE JEWISH POPULATION OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES HAD TO FLEE AS THE RESULT OF VIOLENCE AND POGROMS;
Virtually entire Christian and Muslim population of Jerusalem was forcefully expelled from the Jewish occupation zone in 1948, while the Jews of Iraq, Morocco and Egypt enjoyed peace and prestige.
11. SOME 630,000 ARABS LEFT ISRAEL IN 1948, WHILE CLOSE TO A MILLION JEWS WERE FORCED TO LEAVE THE MUSLIM COUNTRIES;
Arab Jews were seduced or forced by Zionists to leave their homes, while the Palestinians were expelled by the same Zionists.
12. IN SPITE OF THE VAST TERRITORIES AT THEIR DISPOSAL, ARAB REFUGEES WERE DELIBERATELY PREVENTED FROM ASSIMILATING INTO THEIR HOST COUNTRIES. OF 100 MILLION REFUGEES FOLLOWING WORLD WAR 2, THEY ARE THE ONLY GROUP TO HAVE NEVER INTEGRATED WITH THEIR CORELIGIONISTS. MOST OF THE JEWISH REFUGEES FROM **EUROPE** AND **ARAB LANDS** WERE SETTLED IN **ISRAEL**, A COUNTRY NO LARGER THAN NEW **JERSEY**;
The Palestinians are forever faithful to Palestine, while Jews do not mind to change countries and allegiances.
13. THERE ARE 22 MUSLIM COUNTRIES, NOT COUNTING **PALESTINE**. THERE IS ONLY ONE JEWISH STATE. ARABS STARTED ALL FIVE WARS AGAINST **ISRAEL**, AND LOST EVERY ONE OF THEM;
Jews live in 160 states, and sit in parliaments of 10 countries; there are or were Jewish premier ministers in France, Russia, Austria etc. In the Jewish state, there are no goy ministers, and goyim – whether Christian or Muslim have no full rights, even if they were born there.
Arabs started only one war, in 1973, and were victorious then, and in 2006 as well. The Jews won only one war, in 1967, because they perfidiously attacked without declaring the war.
14. FATAH AND HAMAS CONSTITUTIONS STILL CALL FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF **ISRAEL**. **ISRAEL** CEDED MOST OF THE WEST BANK AND ALL OF **GAZA** TO THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, AND EVEN PROVIDED IT WITH ARMS;
“Destruction of Israel” means elimination of its racist character, like destruction of the Aryan Third Reich eliminated its racism, but preserved Germany. “Destruction” of Dixie, or of Rhodesia was also blessing for all concerned.
Israel ceded nothing to the PNA but the right to clean streets. Israeli army and police may, and does enter anyplace in the West Bank and Gaza which remain surrounded by the Jewish forces.
15. DURING THE JORDANIAN OCCUPATION, JEWISH HOLY SITES WERE VANDALIZED AND WERE OFF LIMITS TO JEWS. UNDER ISRAELI RULE, ALL MUSLIM AND CHRISTIAN HOLY SITES ARE ACCESSIBLE TO ALL FAITHS;
The Jews do not allow any Muslim below age of 45 to pray in the Mosque of al Aqsa, they do not allow Christians of Bethlehem to celebrate Easter in Jerusalem and do not allow Christians of Jerusalem to celebrate Christmas in Bethlehem.
16. OUT OF 175 UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS UP TO 1990, 97 WERE AGAINST **ISRAEL**; OUT OF 690 GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS, 429 WERE AGAINST **ISRAEL**;
And Israel accepted and fulfilled only one of them which equated Zionism with racism.
18. THE U.N. WAS SILENT WHEN THE JORDANIANS DESTROYED 58 SYNAGOGUES IN THE **OLD CITY** OF **JERUSALEM**. IT REMAINED SILENT WHILE **JORDAN** SYSTEMATICALLY DESECRATED THE ANCIENT JEWISH CEMETERY ON THE **MOUNT OF OLIVES**, AND IT REMAINED SILENT WHEN **JORDAN** ENFORCED APARTHEID LAWS PREVENTING JEWS FROM ACCESSING THE **TEMPLE MOUNT** AND WESTERN WALL.
The Jews destroyed one thousand mosques and churches in 1948; they besieged the Church of Nativity in 2002, they. Jews also desecrated hundreds of Christian and Muslim cemeteries, turned the mosque of Caesarea into a bar, and demolished the 5th century Church of St Barbara. Jews also enforced apartheid laws preventing goyim from coming back to the places they were born.
THESE ARE TRYING TIMES. WE MUST ASK OURSELVES WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING, AND WHAT WE WILL TELL OUR GRANDCHILDREN ABOUT OUR ACTIONS DURING THIS CRISIS, WHEN WE HAD THE CHANCE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
START NOW! SEND THIS MESSAGE TO 20 FRIENDS, AND ASK EACH OF THEM TO SEND IT TO 20 MORE. JEWISH OR NOT, IT DOES NOT MATTER.
That’s right! Do it!
TRUTH AND PEACE ARE VALUES COMMON TO ALL OF US. EVERYONE MUST KNOW!
Let them!
Jan 29, 2009 - 1:30 pm 9. Chesler Chronicles » The Islamic Version of Orwell’s “1984″ Is Upon Us:[...] I’ve previously written, the London School of Appeasement and Terrorism dis-invited or banned Douglas Murray from chairing a panel about Islam and [...]
Jan 29, 2009 - 4:21 pm