The answer to Ms. Chessler’s question?

Conservatism, Christ, and the British Empire.

Let us be Imperialists.

Comment #1 (yours) seems to betray you forget this little fact called “Reformation”, that a bunch decided to throw-off the developments of Roman Paganism and “go biblical”, including heavily studying Jewish sources; you also don’t seem to take notice that, historically, educated Christians–that is those who handle Scriptures hermeneutically (we’re talking Rashi type vs. Rabbis here–the subtlest underminer of mystical twisting ever), all humans share in a responsibility for what happened to Christ: a universal sacrifice in terms of hypothetical or potential applicability, though (if we’re being really rigorous with exegesis about it) only particularly (to use a Calvinistic term) atoning in effective application.

That mouthful said, stop patronizing people (comment 26); the anthology known as the “New Testament” is a collection of Jewish writings, need I remind you? And any claimant on Messiah-ship would have to have expected to be cut-off: traditional Judaism both recognizes that no two ultimate Messiahs are presented in the texts from which the two-concept teaching is nevertheless derived (Ben David & Ben Joseph), yet a two-messiah teaching was come-up with, asserted, and continues to be asserted, to this day due to the presentation of Him as both suffering and glorious. The gospels themselves are written as contemporary docs even referring to a Jerusalem pre-fall (and it was a rank liberal who dared actually pay attention to those features and give a pre-70 date); it’s also due to such “liberal heretics” (that is, from the party-line of ignoring source documents and speculating) that have led to an understanding of such things as John being an essentially Jewish book–which should be obvious anyways (talks as Jews yet speaks in a “we vs. them Jews” evidencing the ejection from the synagogues of the time), so drop the shallow Catholic=Christian and “Jesus was for gentiles” delusions, as NT-wise Jesus was for both (two folds into one, and came for the Jews first); it was not only Jews who were the first Christians, but it was Jews who first persecuted Christians; it was Rabbinism that seared perhaps the most violent and putrid of forms of bigotry ever known into the historical Jewish, and the world’s, consience–as is found through the literatrue–and it is a fact we’re all still reeling from, superiorisim and zionism-as-truism criticism=evil (vs. legal, legit, etc.; I’m all for the existence, defense, fortification, and protection of Israel) and “greatness just because of our flesh” (read the prophets and disillusion yourself will you), and myriads other detestable fruits that both subtly and openly constitute major points of the Jewish mind of modernity-despite the majority irreligosity and even atheism combined with the very modernism/liberalism currently striking hard at any hope for the security and maintenance of Israel.

I hate (abor, despise, extremely dislike, loathe) the shallowness going around and some of Judaism’s own superstitious self-protectionist myths: and confronting Rabbis about it their reply is “it’s necessary”, how disgusting. Read, [Pagans] persecuted and, frequently, [murdered], [in both ignorant bigotry as well as from valid repugnance and retribution--though invalid course of action]“: read the NT dude, the same guy who writes the Jews for unbelief are a synagogue of Satan (Shaul/Paul) for rejecting their Messiah is the guy who writes (a) he would go to hell in their stead if he could, and (b) they are beloved for the sake of the fathers. How can history still seriously call what was done from the stark opposite, in rejection of the early Christian message, “Christian”: it would be like a Jew who calls himself a Jew but acts the pagan–he has flesh, but no substance to his claim, while the Scriptures applaud converted whores who act the part: the Scriptures themselves thematically, near-dogmatically, teach a Jew is one inwardly and faithfully, not by just mere blood; “the traitor” (Paul, as a friend put it) actually dares confront his own people about this in the NT, and tells it to the early Christians (Jews and gentiles alike), taking it from Scripture not pulling it out of his butt. That’s nearly always the ominous message of the prophets themselves–paraphrasing, “you fat heads, God will pay you visit (bad) for your faithlessness and scourge and drive you in agony across the earth (that’s Moses–though most Jews don’t even believe His authorship anymore, either) but has left himself a remnant” (”fat heads” is literal idiom: they were quite scatological at times). One of my favorite recent (as in a few years) events in Israel was the president alluding to Scripture calling Israel hard-hearted and thick headed.

There’s a reason this people is called “Isra’El”.

Cest vrai, t’as perdu ton emploi ? umm t’as pourtant des ressources dans le cerveau, et un pistolet, je pense que tu peux te faire engager comme garde-du-corps très spécial de Michelle

gros bisou

Comment est votre chien? Mais s’il vous plaît n’oubliez pas de petit ami yur.

S’il vous plaît fournir votre numéro de téléphone cellulaire, je suis sans emploi et que vous voulez y aller un de vous rencontrer.

Cordialement,

Miami CSI

Please do not write in Langues d’oïl, people here barely “spic Inglish”.