Yesterday in Khartoum, a world away, the Sudanese police beat the women who peacefully came to support Lubna Ahmed al-Hussein; they beat her lawyer too. Like their fellow Islamist thugs in Teheran, they blocked the cameramen so you cannot see their dirty work.
Yes, as one of my readers pointed out: The judge delayed Hussein’s trial possibly in the hope that someone would kill her, (she’s been threatened) and that no trial, no public flogging would be necessary.
There are no Marines coming over the next hill on this one.
There certainly are no Western feminists anywhere on the horizon.
Otherwise, the feminists all live (and die) in the Muslim world right now and their heroism is dazzling, mind-boggling.
The Western multi-culturalists say that they are “helping” all they can by refusing to discriminate against Islam and Islamism, by accepting the veil in our midst, and by “de-constructing” it in the classroom. They say: The West has prostitution, Islam veils its women–get used to it.
As if Islam does not have a long and terrible history (which continues to this day) of sex slavery, concubines, polygamy, one-hour holy “marriages,” and western-style prostitutes. As if girls and women in burqas or wearing veils (Hussein wears a headscarf) are never beaten, humiliated, or sentenced to be publicly flogged. As if a veiled woman=dignity and an unveiled woman=naked prey. Stay tuned for more on this theme.
**************
On another note entirely: Last weekend I went to a private beach in my hometown of Brooklyn. It was an enchanted afternoon. The sand there still smells like my childhood, the ocean is still there too. White sailboats sailed by, an older, crowd read their books and newspapers quietly, talked softly, walked slowly in the sea, sat under the trees or on the grass which lined the beach. There was no loud music, no hawking of ice cream or food. It was another era. One that is missed.
*****************
I have just been told that they are closing the Library at the 92nd Y. Thirty thousand books and the services of a librarian will no longer be here. Money problems? A disdain for books, a preference for online reading? (See my
blog here on this very subject.) One of the librarians who heard me speak is the one who alerted me to this. She is frantic.
So many places in this city have disappeared. Long before the recession/depression hit, (which has led to more and more stores being boarded up), I would pass by a corner and look for something that is no longer there, a shop, a service, a cafe, all, all replaced by a newer, younger, taller, sleeker building or store. One by one, bit by bit, they are taking away the past, making way for the future.
I hope that future is not a veiled one.





PJM Home
Woman's Inhumanity to Woman
The Death of Feminism: What’s Next in the Struggle for Women’s Freedom
Women and Madness
The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It
Women of the Wall: Claiming Sacred Ground at Judaism’s Holy Site
Letters to a Young Feminist
With Child: A Diary of Motherhood
Feminist Foremothers in Women’s Studies, Psychology, and Mental Health
Patriarchy: Notes of an Expert Witness
Sacred Bond: The Legacy of Baby M
Mothers on Trial: The Battle for Children and Custody
About Men
Women, Money & Power
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
10 Comments
1. logdon:Ms Chesler’s account of how Muslim women are somehow afforded a ’special place’in the eyes of Western feminists and their cohorts who wield power is telling.
Here in Britain, Muslims get such a free pass by using the spurious ‘cultural difference/respect’ mantle that under age sexual grooming of white girls in areas of high Muslim populace goes virtually ignored.
We are in the process of enacting sweeping legislation which will require any professional who has contact with children to be vetted, then have to pay for a special certificate.
This draconian sweep is state control of high order and many are refusing.
Meanwhile real abuse is going on under their noses and not a peep?
Of course the Muslim community, whenever the rare arrests do occur, howl of discrimination and islamophobia.
In other words if you are a Muslim male, a blind eye is applied, and young girls suffer with little chance of retribution. Or real justice.
This is not unnoticed by our population and an article in yesterdays Times of our duty to be in Afghanistan to help the terribly abused women was met with a barrage of ridicule.
In other words our Government’s willful refusal to prosecute Muslim males here in Britain is having a knock on effect.
Why should we lose lives in an overseas hell hole when similar practices are going right here but because of our Govs cowardice are swept under the carpet. There are votes, you see, in those ghettos and Labour, on the ropes after twelve years of ruin are hardly likely to rock the boat.
Those girls are reduced to pawns in a divisive political game and a massive double standard is applied.
Muslim women in Afghanistan worthy of protection. White girls in Britain suffering similar predatorial abuse from Muslim males ignored.
Welcome to the world of cultural relativity.
Aug 6, 2009 - 12:37 am 2. jaujau:We must continually drive your last point home to the lazy, relativistic nonthinking leftards who say those kinds of things.
Aug 6, 2009 - 12:54 am 3. Gianni:We must get in their faces, and we must shame them. The women in the Muslim world cannot do it without deadly repurcussions, yet that doesn’t stop them. It’s only the smug and arrogant western liberal women who are too gutless to help these women. We must shame them and name them, too.
Phyllis, the Feminist Majority newswire include stories about Lubna and other muslim women’s plight.
Aug 6, 2009 - 2:51 am 4. George Jochnowitz:And, I was surprised in a positive way to see a discussion panel about islamic fundamentalism listed among the others on the recent NOW convention.
I see these things as signs of positive developments.
First things first. Feminists care about women, but opposition to Israel and support for Islam take precedence. Since most feminists identify as leftists (not to be confused with liberals), they are part of the Marxist-Islamic Alliance.
Aug 6, 2009 - 3:45 am 5. David Thomson:“…all replaced by a newer, younger, taller, sleeker building or store.”
You may be assuming far too much. New York City’s days of greatness could be coming to a close. Both individuals and businesses have to ask themselves this harsh question: Why should they endure the high taxes and declining lifestyle? Does the stock market really have to be a large city? Internet video is getting better all the time. Are face to face meetings worth the normally high costs? The voters of New York have royally screwed themselves. They voted for all this left-wing tax and spend craziness. The piper now has to be paid. Nope, those building might remain vacant and abandoned—for many years into the distant future.
Aug 6, 2009 - 11:01 am 6. Anna:I only have two questions.
#1 logdon: Would you please elaborate on what you referred to as the ‘under age sexual grooming of white girls in areas of high Muslim populace’?
#4 Mr.Jochnowitz: I hear a lot about Islamists and Marxists working towards the same goals, but I don’t quite understand this alliance or what these two groups have common. Could you elaborate, please?
Thank you
Aug 6, 2009 - 3:05 pm 7. ZBudapest:Darling sister!
Aug 7, 2009 - 10:05 am 8. Dave:You blame the feminists for not helping personally the opressed poor feminists in the islamic apartaids? How in the world could THAT be done without being killed ourselves? Even you just have words, thank heaven you use them, but words only. What would it look like:” feminist on the horizon” to help the poor women under islamic aparteid? If you have a suggestion, dont hold back!
But stop blaming feminists for the gender aparteid in islamic countries. If was not for feminism those women would not have even a HOPE for change.
Anna #6: Permit me to intrude a bit and answer
your second question:
The two groups you mention both seek to install and perpetuate a regime of total control based on nothing but prior restraints
and incessant micro-management.
As birds of a feather flock together, they will wind up scratching each others back regardless of what differences they may appear to have.
During WWII, Islamists and Nazis were bosom buddies, so all this is nothing new. And out in the Far East, Imperial Japanese certainly
managed to make a few deals with Stalin’s cadres.
Whenever the essential elements of desires
coincide, common ground will be found. This is true for both the good guys and the bad guys. The latter, unfortunately, manage to do it more quickly.
Hopefully this will clarify things for you.
Aug 7, 2009 - 1:11 pm 9. lauren:Phyllis, this is about balance or lack there of. I just received the 92nd Street Y’s catalog of events. Surely they can afford to keep the library open. They are choosing not to. They are choosing to take that money & allocate it elsewhere. It’s not for lack of affordability, that’s for sure. This is a a Y where the richest of the rich send their children to day camp. The money is there.
George, thank you for the amazing words you put to this movement. I’ve been searching for some time to explain it properly. You really hit it. “First things first. … Since most feminists identify as leftists (not to be confused with liberals), they are part of the Marxist-Islamic Alliance.”
We have let them co-opt the word and usage of liberal. And because of that I identify myself as a conservative. But these women [and men] are the furthest thing from liberal. Authoritarian group thinkers would be the correct term for them.
Scary times, that I never thought I’d see in my lifetime. 1939 all over again.
Aug 8, 2009 - 4:45 am 10. Marion L.:I cannot speak for all Western feminists. However, I can speak for myself. I am on the horizon. I am appalled by what is happening to Lubna Ahmed al Hussein and I oppose gender apartheid wherever it exists.
Aug 8, 2009 - 10:33 am