37 Comments

1. Pajamas Media » PJM Roundup: The Fort Hood Memorial, the President’s Speech (Continuously Updated):

[...] Obama at Ft Hood Memorial: No Mention of Terrorism or Jihad (Phyllis Chesler, Pajamas [...]

Nov 10, 2009 - 2:00 pm 2. George Jochnowitz:

As far as I can remember, G.W. Bush never used the words “jihad” or “Islamist.” Political correctness crosses political and ideological boundaries.

There is a zero-cost method that writers and columnists might use in the war against terror. There is a point we need to make: The 9/11 terrorists could not possibly have gained any strategic or political advatage by their acts. The same is true of all the terrorists who killed themselves so that they could kill others. They killed and died simply because they thought their acts were moral and beautiful. They were not only evil; they were also idiots.

Would it work to point out and repeat this fact? Maybe not, but nothing could be lost if we tried.

Nov 10, 2009 - 2:26 pm 3. David W. Lincoln:

I hope that the exchange between you, Phyllis, and your opponent will be videotaped, and then placed on YouTube.

As for the tap dancing Barry O, the Chief deformed soul in the Oval Office, did today proves an important point: He is as legitimate as the “Brezhnev-era apparatchik” referred to by Daniel Hannan in the 3 and a half minute rebuttal to British Prime Minister Gordon Brown in the European Parliament, which went viral after being posted on YouTube.

Take a look at “Windswept House”, the last novel by Malachi Martin, and one can see how Popes can be seen as illegitimate. The same can be used to make the case of heads of government, as well as heads of state, can be viewed as illegitimate.

Nov 10, 2009 - 2:30 pm 4. wayne:

Seriously Phyllis, what do you expect from someone who was immersed in Socialism, anti-Westernism, AND at least several years worth Jihad-theory during his youth, not to mention his 20-year sojourn with Jeremiah Wright?

There has to at least be a pretty significant voice rattling around between those elephant-ears of his that thinks that on a grand scale we deserve attacks like this AND he did bow to the Saudi King and travel to all 57 states – remember?

If nothing really comes of this whole incident and Hasan spends the next 10 years or so rattling around in some sort of a cushy faux-prison cell doing interviews/cell lectures with a coterie of Justice lawyers, selected journalists, activists, and maybe even a mail-a-felon bride while the military continues to be crapped on, derided, and wasted on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan with no real direction or cause incurring both massive losses AND massive resignations – you will have proof that the fix is in.

I fully believe that this will end up being just another perfect tool for Comrade Barry to continue to redistribute not only our wealth, national prestige, culture, and power but even our military capability away to the rest of the world hoping that we will be primed to submit to a one-world socialist utopia – even if it is one dominated by Socialist Jihadi’s like Comrade Ahmedinajad or Comrade bin Laden!

Nov 10, 2009 - 2:42 pm 5. Anonymous:

Hasan’s muslim, shot at soldiers and yelled “Allah Akbar!” while doing it. Does this have to be legally established that this was “jihad” before it can be legally established that he did it?

Nov 10, 2009 - 2:43 pm 6. Grantman:

Go for it, Phyllis. Don’t pull any punches with Lou.

Nov 10, 2009 - 2:47 pm 7. ERS:

Phyllis, I find it interesting that, even though Nidal Malik Hasan has been described repeatedly in the Western media as being from Jordanian/Palestinian roots, the Jordanians–at least the anonymous source quoted in the state-controlled media–aren’t having it:

http://www.jordantimes.com/index.php?news=21398

I guess giving birth to al-Zarqawi and the would-be Houston bomber were bad enough.

Ellen Sheeley

Nov 10, 2009 - 3:06 pm 8. dymphna:

We don’t have a TV, but if this is YouTubed could you let us all know? I’d very much like to see it.

A suggestion: want to see how many times you can make up for our President’s immoral omissions in his speech by your own repetitions of words like, oh, maybe “terrorist” or “counterjihad” (i.e., what you’re doing by talking to Dobbs is an example of this). Maybe you could touch on the persistence of those members of the terminally thin-skinned Grievance Club? Hasan was evidently a life-long member.

As a psychologist, it would be educational forthe rest of us if you were given enough time to mention the cognitive dissonance displayed by these Islamist killers.

I mean in particular the lack of congurence between their imagined eternal purity of Allah’s paradise juxtaposed with the need to find a “pure enough” wife whilst having no compunctions about visiting bars and using the services of lap-dancers.

Our press just loves it when they find some well-known Christian preacher visiting the no-tell motel with a professional woman who represents everything the preacher claims to find repugnant…an intriguing parallel with the Hasans of the world with one big difference: these pathetic preachers don’t then feel complled to blow stuff up or go on killing sprees.

Nov 10, 2009 - 3:34 pm 9. Judy, NYC:

no leadership. he’s no commander of anything. just a sad case. a coward. sad for us, too.

Nov 10, 2009 - 3:40 pm 10. Butterfly Mornings and Wildflower Afternoons:

Dr. Chesler,
As I read your article, I realize how many times you point out to us that it was Jihadist Islamists murdering Americans, but my question is how do you know?
After reading a great deal of the Koran online, yesterday I am once again completely sure, that if they go by their book that a murderer named Mohammad wrote that they must hate us all.
Though I am nice to all people, I will not trust people that live by the Koran. I think they are a murdering cult after reading many pages of the book. Islam is a cult with a mean book, and that is what I truly believe.
It is funny that Obama cannot say the words terrorists, or terror, since it is all in the Islamic book, because the words are mean, and the words tell them to kill and terrorize.
My question is do all Islamists have the same mean book? I read the words terrorize a few times in it, and after reading their book, I understand more about their cult, and I understand that they hate us. I understand not to trust people who believe this book and live by it, you know, since I fall into the category of what they call infidel, since everyone does except Islam.

I will be nice to them, but I will not turn my back on them after what I read in their book.

Nov 10, 2009 - 3:43 pm 11. RRWest:

We have not learned our lessons.

World leaders have fallen under the spell of trying to please all of the people all of the time in the narrow pursuit of getting votes in future elections.

If any group, whether it is individual or as large as a “religion” unilaterally declares war on you, then you fight with the same tactics and strategy that your enemy uses. No other solution is possible unless the other side is willing and able to compromise.

With Islam there is no compromise, since its leaders have proven over the past 1,300 years that they are not to be trusted.

Since the time of Charlemagne until the retreat of the Ottoman Turks from eastern Europe not even 100 years ago, Islam has waged war on all others through jihad.

Now, however, their leaders have turned our laws on free speech and multicultural policies against us to conquer the west from within.

It is time to return the declaration of war back to them and fight.

Nov 10, 2009 - 3:48 pm 12. Stephen:

Islamic terrorists believe that the blood of their victims washes away their sins before God. The Koran is explicit in its glorification of violent jihad against infidels as a shortcut to paradise.

That is the real motivation of Jihad. Personal selfishness and the impatient desire for a certain ticket to enjoy the pleasures of the Islamic brothel paradise with the 17 translucent virgins, streams of wine, milk, honey, low hanging fruit, etc. etc.

An utterly repugnant ideology motivates utterly repugnant actions. Going on 1400 years now, at last count.

Nov 10, 2009 - 3:56 pm 13. Donald Sensing:

Don’t agree. I am a retired Army officer and I thought the speech was spot on. This was a Memorial Service, not a policy speech opportunity.

I carry no water for this administration or the president, as anyone who’s read my blog knows. But finding fault with his speech today comes dangerously close to Obama Derangement Syndrome.

Nov 10, 2009 - 4:03 pm 14. Doug Burke:

Oh come on, Phyllis. A president is Diplomat in Chief and can’t go shooting off his mouth the way we would, especially when he’s trying to build better relations with the Arab world. That sort of thing is for unsophisticated dopes like Bush.

Nov 10, 2009 - 4:48 pm 15. IQ al Rassooli:

As always Phyllis speaks out bravely and clearly. I’m very largely in agreement with her (and usually am completely in agreement). However on this occasion even she does not seem to quite grasp the horror of the situation that I have been aware of for many years and that America is only very slightly and slowly waking up to…..

…..firstly there really is no such distinction as “radical” and “non-radical” Muslims: someone either is, or is not, a follower of Muhammad. If a follower then it is mandated that he (or she) accepts (and reveres) the Quran in its entirety and follows all of its instructions as far as he (or she) understands them and is able. Any so-called “believer” who even for a moment questions the validity or relevance of even the tiniest aspect of the Quran is suddenly considered an “infidel” (Kafir) by all the other clones of Muhammad and as an outcast is then in great danger.

The reality is that ALL followers of Muhammad are either actively or covertly involved in jihad of some form, or else tacitly support it, or perhaps are currently neutral and dormant – merely waiting to be “reactivated”….. ANYone who considers themselves to be a “true” Muslim cannot at the same time possible be loyal to America or anywhere else for that matter. They are in effect traitors-in-waiting if not already in deed.

Put quite simply it is, in my opinion, an act of madness to allow a Muhammadan Muslim to join – let alone hold high rank in – any armed services, the police force, any security related position, any senior position in academia or anywhere else for that matter where they might be able to directly or covertly harm their “fellow” citizens (whom they have been taught to fundamentally hate and despise and dearly desire to kill if and when they can get away with it or when they feel their unnatural urge to “martyr” themselves)……

An inability to properly understand this very simple point lies at the heart of much of the confusion and totally misdirected resources of almost all “western” governments and other authorities around the world; they are all struggling to see what has caused these people to “become radicalised”, and are trying to identify exactly what it was they have “done to upset or offend them” when in reality these so-called “radical Muslims” (or “islamists”) are simply being “good Muslims” and doing as they are supposed to do…. as their maniac-Muhammad demanded of them – and all who can be persuaded, fooled or forced to do for ever after them……. Sorry but it really is depressingly clear and simple as far as I see it.

Take a long hard look at the way fellow members of their cult (the cult of Muhammad) are behaving throughout the Muslim-majority world; I think you’ll be hard-pressed to spot the difference. All it takes is for one of them in our West to decided that the time has come for him (or her) to “live the Muslim dream” of committing jihad and if possible dying as a “martyr”.

As I’ve said elsewhere, rather surprisingly these people really don’t believe in killing “innocent” people. However for them simply not believing utterly in the “truth” of Islam and submitting to a life of Muhammad-worship is in itself a terrible crime legitimately punishable by death…. dying whilst waging jihad against such “criminals” (you and I – the “unbelieving Kuffar”) is for them a wonderful and blissful joy for which they believe they will be brilliantly rewarded in their version of the hereafter (a celestial brothel).

Its disgusting.

We’ve got one huge problem on our hands.

There may be a solution, if enough people can understand and accept the basics, then be prepared to play their part in reducing – and ultimately negating – the terrible and otherwise ever increasing danger that we are all currently facing.

Please take a look at http://www.Ummat-al-Kuffar.org and give serious and urgent thought to playing your part in our own, and thankfully now awakening, Ummat.

Thank you.

Kind Regadrs,
IQ al Rassooli

Nov 10, 2009 - 5:06 pm 16. Sean:

I love how PJ Media has a ‘no ad hominem attacks’ policy on comments, but not the drivel it publishes.

Because Ms. Chessler lacks a brain, I will add this: when there are heightened tensions, like at Ft. Hood, it is the job of the president and all other adults NOT TO MAKE MATTERS WORSE. Name calling and racist/anti-religious nonsense serve no purpose, except to gratify your hatred. And gratifying some cranky lady’s hatred is not the president’s job. Grow up.

Nov 10, 2009 - 5:43 pm 17. MiamaMan:

Your statement: “America, the West, and Israel are all fighting back in a war that radical, jihadic Islamists, (not Muslims) have declared against us.”

Only partly right. All Islam is radical, as is the Koran, thus all Muslims, one way or another, are radical, or at least condone and abate, as they must follow the hateful Koran. Only when this is understood we stand a chance to win this war, but for that to happen still horrible crimes will have to be committed, of a nature that we can’t even fathom today. Where is the sincere outcry from CAIR and the Muslim community here about the Fort Hood massacre? From the Imams interviewed on TV, but lukewarm half-explanations always falling back on victimology.

I imaging it is hard for a feminist to understand this fact, for feminists have always been champions of the victimhood syndrome themselves, as at some point are/were the gays, minorities, and now the Muslims themselves. For; who is a feminist anyhow? Can anyone define a feminist to me? Aren’t they a bunch of gals bent of behaving as if men did not exist? But men exist, and as well Muslims exist. That’s why the Army did not act against Jihadist Hasan, and felt paralyzed, and as such is also guilty of the tragedy, and the dead and the injured, all because Hasan, the Muslim, is now THE VICTIM! Thus emasculated Chris Matthews questions whether contacting 20 times Al Qaeda by a full duty military man is really something illegal. Imagine a US military officer contacting the Soviets for treason 20 times during the cold war.

Yes, the Muslim are the victims, CAIR is a victim. The Mosques and the Imams are victims too. Not the 13 cowardly-killed by Hasan the Jihadist. Let’s not jump to conclusions, Obama said. Let’s not create a backlash against the VICTIMIZED Muslim community.

If only people would study what have happened in India with their Muslim population since partition (180 millions of them). How they have used every nick and cranny to undermine their country of origin, ALWAYS PLAYING THE VICTIM, to obtain more than they deserve, to lie, to divide, to commit terrorist acts, to flaunt every single attempt at birth control by the Indian nation. They could very well understand what is coming to us, what has already come to Europe.

Nov 10, 2009 - 7:14 pm 18. tohtoo:

We understand that there are moderate muslims and radical muslims.
Unfortunately there is no such thing as “Radical Islam”.
There’s just “Islam”
The quran encourages violences towards the non-believers, its just that simple.
As long as we allow for these elements in the quran to be encouraged violence under the right of “freedom of speech” then we are destined for more dom and gloom.

Nov 10, 2009 - 7:34 pm 19. HellenoChristian:

Here a video which remembers us how sometimes incompetent (the problem he had to talk about isn’t wether there are Muslim relatives in a family, it is to talk about Islam, its very beginning, its history and his law – I think Former Muslims United are starting telling us a bit about it …) sometimes liar (he lied about his religious belonging – and when it comes to Islam, this means he lied about his ethical principles) he’s been: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY .

George, the fact Bush never used the word Jihad or Islamism doesn’t matter: al-Obama wanted to be “the opposite” of Bush or not? And even so called reformist of Islam use the word Jihad (and used it in the case of Fort Hood): how comes this “expert in Islam” (as he self-depicted himself) doesn’t know about it and when to use it (does he maybe even deny the existence of Jihad? Maybe even in Islamic History – oh yes, among other things he’s an “expert Historian” too, and he “knows better” wether Islam practiced “islamically holy War” or not … -?).

I’m so afraid another totalitarian Ideology (both Islamism or Obam-munism) tries to take possession of our (now and still for now) free world …. Obama talks about “regular process” to a Terrorist, which means he’s ment to treat Terrorism like any other act of violence which affects human Society.

We all know that acts belonging to totalitarian Ideologies have to be treated harshlier than other kind of violent acts, since they aren’t isolated fact but part of a Movement affecting a great part of society, not just the “gunman” and “the victims” of the – pretended – isolated fact.

I mean: we have a whole History of Revolutions and Wars behind us! We know a lot about Ideologies and Totalitarianisms, and about Terrorism (“red” one and mafious one included).

This “man” is treating with velvet gloves ideologists who deserve to be condemned as soon as they give evidence of exteme views (and this “Major” appearently did – he taught Koran and Palestinianism instead of the lessons he was ment to teach!).

The need of condemning them (since we condemn an Ideology like Islam – which preaches hate toward others), is different than the unfair condemnation of (innocent) dissidents under totalitarian Regimes (like former Communist Russia, Communist China, islamized Islamic Countries, former Nazist Germany, Islamist Iran, …), who can even be human Rights’ activists: condemning Islam(ism) and its followers is a DUTY in a civilized world and for a civilized world (no doubt that the West is far more civilized – it went through Wars, Revolutions and Reformations – than the Islamic world).

This Obamist scares me: and his followers too (I had the “honor” or the “horror” to talk with some of them: either they won’t discuss with you, but they simply start heavily insulting you – for anything it passes in their mind -, or they clearly believe in fairy tales or they rely on appearances – which is undestandable if they were children, but they are adults or even about elderlies! -) – and I know ignorance is the gateway of OBSCURANTISM … wait … to Obamascurantism!

Nov 10, 2009 - 7:43 pm 20. lisa:

Lets call this what it is, not a tradgedy but a massacre againsts AMERICANS by low life jihadists. If this had been an American officer in Yemen or wherever and he had killed 13 muslims, and injured another 30, just how do you think he would have been dealt with? He would not be enjoying free medical care in a first class hospital. He would have had his throat cut by now..no questions. This scum gives everyone a bad name.

Nov 10, 2009 - 9:39 pm 21. SHARIA WATCH UK » OBAMA’S FORT HOOD SPEECH “STERILISED”:

[...] Radical jihadic Islamism/jihadic terrorism was given a free pass by the President of the United States at the Memorial Service for the thirteen soldiers and mental health professionals who were slaughtered at Ft Hood.Thanks to THE CHESTER CHRONICLES [...]

Nov 10, 2009 - 11:38 pm 22. Chesler Chronicles » Obama at Ft Hood Memorial: No Mention of … | Global Security Blog:

[...] original post here: Chesler Chronicles » Obama at Ft Hood Memorial: No Mention of … Tags: acts, enemy, focus-on-iraq, knows-the-enemy, strategic-or-political, will-not, [...]

Nov 10, 2009 - 11:39 pm 23. OpinionEditorial — Blog — Obama at Ft Hood Memorial: No Mention of Terrorism or Jihad:

[...] Continue Reading» [...]

Nov 11, 2009 - 12:23 am 24. rom:

The late anti-islamic activist, italian writer and journalist Oriana Fallaci used to say: “….it goes against all reason to assume that there is any such thing as a good islam (islam) versus a bad islam (islamism).There is only islam and….basta…..!

Nov 11, 2009 - 1:24 am 25. Obama at Ft Hood Memorial: No Mention of Terrorism or Jihad « Nitemare Debates Islam:

[...] pays for his crime (his “crime,” not his “act of war,” not even his “act of terrorism.” Full Story>> Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)President and Michelle Obama Attend Fort Hood [...]

Nov 11, 2009 - 2:39 am 26. IQ al Rassooli:

Thank you, MiamaMan (post 17)…. We are in TOTAL agreement. Well put. If you own or manage a blog or website please do add the live http://www.U-al-K.org graphic promenantly on your home page. We need you and a few million more…

Sean 16 …. Really? Hasn’t it occurred to you that Obama is actually a Muslim himself, but simply another sly, deceitful one who successfully gets away all the time with lying (sometimes called “taquia” – lying and hiding your real views and purpose – a typical timeless trick taught by Muhammad-the-liar) to the gullible….? The following is not very well edited or put together (and misses much damning and conclusive evidence – as though any more were needed) but nonetheless exposes him reasonably well; http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

If you don’t think Obama capable of lying (he is the President, after all) then consider it almost a certainty he even lied (yes, a calculated lie in full knowledge of the truth he concealed) about where he was born. Even his paternal grandmother proudly announced to the world that she was present (in Kenya) when he was born!

[Here’s the gist of the most-likely true version; Apparently his WHITE mother arrived in Kenya heavily pregnant with him, was not accepted or liked by her in-laws, discovered just how badly Muslim men really do treat their women and so, realising her terrible mistake, tried desperately to leave but was not allowed to fly – by the airline company – until she’d given birth. Hence Obama arrived in Hawaii a few days old and therefore, technically, ineligible for consideration as President – except he’s a good liar with many wealthy and powerful friends – all using him – so gets away with it].

Lisa 20 – how right you are! Well said!

Nov 11, 2009 - 4:29 am 27. Deborah Kaye:

I don’t often feel the need to speak out, but the Ft. Hood attack has touched me deeply. I am saddened and angry. As a Jewish-American who lived in Israel for many years, I felt immediately for the victims. How many times in Israel we mourned the victims of suicide bombings. I never doubted that Major Hasan’s assault was motivated by anything other than holy war against the US. It has been such a wake-up call for me these last few days that our President Barak Hussein Obama does not speak out against this act of war against our military, against our beloved country, against the West. The government hid the information on Hasan’s link’s with Al Quaeda. If not for the British press we would know nothing. I am shocked and quite frankly fearful to live in this country today knowing that we have a President who does not believe in protecting our men and women in uniform. And I’m afraid this is only the beginning. Thanks for your blog. DK

Nov 11, 2009 - 5:20 am 28. Steve:

Excellent job, Dr. Chesler!!
You had good statistics and made your points well. I liked the way you pointed out that almost all terror acts, world wide, are connected to Islam. I
Also liked how you made your antagonist (I’ve forgotten his name) admit that it Ft. Hood was a terror act, despite his hesitancy to do so.
Overall, great interview.

Nov 11, 2009 - 6:31 am 29. MiamaMan:

15. IQ al Rassooli and 18. tohtoo and 19. HellenoChristian:

Thanks for your clarity!

16. Sean:

Sean, justifications of this sort was the undoing of good man Daniel Pearl, he may have waken up when the blade carried by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was already too close to his throat.

Nov 11, 2009 - 7:39 am 30. MiamaMan:

SLICK WILLY GETS A KOSOVO STATURE!

Wow, let’s cheer and applaud our great former president Bill “Slick Willy” Jefferson Clinton, Count of Lewinsky.

A beautiful Saudi-funded statue of his countenance was unveiled in Pristina Sunday 11/3/2009, by the Kosovo Albanians, the most retrograde force in all Europe. Shiny, his Red Skelton’s rosy nose to the 4 winds, not a trace of shame for the innocent killed in his high-tech Serbian bombing campaign, Slicky gave a tepid and wooden little speech. Thanks:

1) For reversing The Battle of Poitiers and the Siege of Vienna.
2) For your great knowledge of Balkan history, acquired in the motels of Little Rock.

If they just would have left the Serbs to roam!

Nov 11, 2009 - 8:02 am 31. Ed Drain:

Does anyone remember which Congress vote for forbid the phrase “Islamic terrorist” from being uttered or printed in any congressional speech or document? Hint: Republicans did not have the majority!

Nov 11, 2009 - 8:25 am 32. HellenoChristian:

Barack Hussein (!) said something like “no Faith and no God justifies these acts?”. Well, very easy: Islam isn’t a Faith, Allah isn’t a God. Therefore all the taqiyyah about “the Religion (of Peace)” dramatically falls, together with the “anti defamation of Religions (Islam only)” Resolution, and so on. Thank you Barack Hussein for falling in your own net, your islamically correct net or just in your islamic one.

OFF TOPIC BUT INTERESTING

I wanted to add something about Western “white” women and islamic men [someone mentioned Barack Hussein's "white" mother delivering her baby in Kenya, among certainly not profoundly wellcoming Islamic people]: more often the last ones (Islamic men) trick (nooo, really?) the first ones (Western women), by – guess what? – lying to them (using huge enormous lies, taqyyiah style – just if you do not know that what a hell taqiyyah, or even real Islam is, you gets completely fooled -, told in a perfect actor stlye, which means that in case of Islamic need, these lies include true fake tears, true fake wounds, true fake anything else – a very convincing theater role playing, in order to completely fool the woman. The goal to be achieved is: taking money from her, obtaining Western citizienship through her, getting everything from her – for jihadist and personal purposes. More often Islamic people completely mix jihadist purposes and personal ones. The important is: having an excuse to unjustly get anything you wish from others. In the case of personal relationships this has a name “bezness” – Arabic pronounciation for “business” – and there is a German Association widely talking about the problem. Site in German only [*]).

[*] Presentation: http://www.slideshare.net/SKP_PSC/community-of-interests-against-bezness-english

Nov 11, 2009 - 8:50 am 33. MiamaMan:

26. IQ al Rassooli:

Thanks and Namaste. I have always enjoyed yours posts, and kept your webpage handy. You have not posted here in months, and should do it more often. I bow to you and your honesty!

For example, that compilation of speech’s excepts by the traitor Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28

I could not finish, as it made me gag, but it could be very enlightening for those who have doubts, especially when considering the Freudian sleeps-of-the-tongue, such as “My Islamic faith…” Very telling.

Nov 11, 2009 - 9:07 am 34. Chesler Chronicles » Talking ‘Bout Ft. Hood Terrorism on CNN:Pajamas Media vs. Nation Magazine:

[...] or was not a terrorist attack. I’ve been writing about this very subject rather steadily right here. I was “facing off” on CNN with someone who writes poppycock about “Islamophobia” for The [...]

Nov 11, 2009 - 4:30 pm 35. OpinionEditorial — Blog — Talking With Dobbs ‘Bout Ft. Hood Terrorism on CNN:Pajamas Media vs. Nation Magazine:

[...] Continue Reading» [...]

Nov 13, 2009 - 6:17 am 36. Linda Rivera:

Jihadic Islamists are not Muslims???

Americans are being brainwashed by our leaders that our biggest concern should be about a back-lash against Muslims (which NEVER, ever takes place! We are a peaceful people).

Where is the grief? Where is the outrage against the massacre of our fellow Americans?

And NO concern about doing whatever it takes to prevent any more attacks against infidel innocents. It is disgusting.

Nov 13, 2009 - 7:44 pm 37. OpinionEditorial — Blog — Canada to Immigrants: No Tolerance for "Honor" Killing:

[...] Continue Reading» [...]

Nov 15, 2009 - 6:28 pm

Write a Comment

Name:	(required, displayed)
Email:	(required, not publicized)
URL:	(optional, displayed)
Comments: