<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s winning Georgia Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:37:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JJ Joseph</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4702</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4702</guid>
		<description>@mika:

&quot;The ones most to benefit from enmity between orthodox christian Moscow and orthodox christian Tbilisi are the Turks . . .&quot;

Without Russia backstopping them, Georgia would be fast lunch for the Turks.  Georgia will never have it so good again.  Georgians, individually (don&#039;t forget Stalin) &amp; collectively, are total morons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mika:</p>
<p>&#8220;The ones most to benefit from enmity between orthodox christian Moscow and orthodox christian Tbilisi are the Turks . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>Without Russia backstopping them, Georgia would be fast lunch for the Turks.  Georgia will never have it so good again.  Georgians, individually (don&#8217;t forget Stalin) &amp; collectively, are total morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konyok</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4589</link>
		<dc:creator>Konyok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4589</guid>
		<description>Russian Bear,

The one valid point in your links is the sale of phosphorous oxychloride, a precursor chemical for nerve gas. I do not know the scale of the sales or whether if can be accounted for by other legitimate uses. Interestingly, the links indicated that the US sold much less material to Saddam than other western countries.

Japan started from nothing, China started from a planned economy more primitive than the Soviet Union&#039;s.

The irony here is that if I wanted to boycott Russian goods, there isn&#039;t anything available to me to choose not to buy. The only thing that I have ever seen with a &quot;Made in Russia&quot; label is low quality textiles.

For a nation as well educated as Russia, it is impossible to understand why she is so unable to develop as a proper country. Soon, India will overtake Russia as an industrial power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russian Bear,</p>
<p>The one valid point in your links is the sale of phosphorous oxychloride, a precursor chemical for nerve gas. I do not know the scale of the sales or whether if can be accounted for by other legitimate uses. Interestingly, the links indicated that the US sold much less material to Saddam than other western countries.</p>
<p>Japan started from nothing, China started from a planned economy more primitive than the Soviet Union&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The irony here is that if I wanted to boycott Russian goods, there isn&#8217;t anything available to me to choose not to buy. The only thing that I have ever seen with a &#8220;Made in Russia&#8221; label is low quality textiles.</p>
<p>For a nation as well educated as Russia, it is impossible to understand why she is so unable to develop as a proper country. Soon, India will overtake Russia as an industrial power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russian Bear</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4528</link>
		<dc:creator>Russian Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4528</guid>
		<description>Fred:  Georgia &lt;b&gt;certainly is not a Russian revenge for Kosovo, or payback for Kosovo. Not if you see it from Russian side. But they use the same words and rhetorhic the USA used when they bombed Serbia over Kosovo. So, from your side, Georgia is &quot;a payback&quot;. You created the precedent and you got it.
It started as long as in 1992, when during the first uprising in Kosovo, Miloshevich abolished Kosovo autonomy. The USA president G. Bush Sr. made an encouraging for Albanians statement that USA would protect Kosovo Albanians. After that Kosovo insurgency was fanned, supported politically, assisted financially and militarily by the West, mostly by the USA, as the instrument to remove Miloshevich from power. The KLA was taken off from the USA terrorist organizations list. The USA Albanians volunteered to join the KLA. The KLA tactics was to provoke Serbs by attacking and ambushing them, and each time Serbs were the ones to blame. Kosovo Albanians staged humanitarian &quot;catastrophe&quot; and &quot;genocide&quot; by leaving their villages in front of Serbian advance (often under the KLA order), and each time the judge was a USA ambassador in Macedonia, who from the first glance could identify the victims of the shootings as &quot;poor civilian Kosovars killed by cruel Serbs&quot;. How all this ended? The USA said, that Serbs had lost their moral right to govern Kosovo.

What happens with Ossetia is pretty similar. Ossetians wanted to separate from Georgia. There was inter-ethnic conflict with a lot of civilian casualties and destructions. Russians protected Ossetians by sending their peacekeepers there. They promised them further protection. They said they would not allow any military actions by Georgians. Ossetians  denied access for Georgian to their area. They had their own elections, they kept provoking Georgians by shooting at their villages. And Russians blamed Georgians all the time. This time Georgians attacked the Ossetian capital causing heavy civilian casualties. Russians called it &quot;genocide&quot; and &quot;humanitarian catastrophe&quot;. They intervened to push Georgians out of Koso... err, form S. Ossetia. Where you see the difference?
That Milosevich was &quot;a thug&quot; and Saakashvilly is &quot;a nice guy&quot;? Well, this is a matter of tastes. And how can you explain it to the dead Ossetians?
What is next? I think Russians are going to make a statement that Georgia lost its moral right to govern S. Ossetia and Abkhazia...  
P.S. Separation of this two regions from is the Russian objective. The pipe stays aside and has nothing to do with this Russian operation. The pipe is not the Georgian only property. It was built with the money from a few Western oil companies, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey. Russia has good relations with all of them other than Georgia. Russia&#039;s oil business is going well. She is getting her dollars- this pipe is not an obstacle. Why would Russia go after the pipe? Just to get in troubles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred:  Georgia <b>certainly is not a Russian revenge for Kosovo, or payback for Kosovo. Not if you see it from Russian side. But they use the same words and rhetorhic the USA used when they bombed Serbia over Kosovo. So, from your side, Georgia is &#8220;a payback&#8221;. You created the precedent and you got it.<br />
It started as long as in 1992, when during the first uprising in Kosovo, Miloshevich abolished Kosovo autonomy. The USA president G. Bush Sr. made an encouraging for Albanians statement that USA would protect Kosovo Albanians. After that Kosovo insurgency was fanned, supported politically, assisted financially and militarily by the West, mostly by the USA, as the instrument to remove Miloshevich from power. The KLA was taken off from the USA terrorist organizations list. The USA Albanians volunteered to join the KLA. The KLA tactics was to provoke Serbs by attacking and ambushing them, and each time Serbs were the ones to blame. Kosovo Albanians staged humanitarian &#8220;catastrophe&#8221; and &#8220;genocide&#8221; by leaving their villages in front of Serbian advance (often under the KLA order), and each time the judge was a USA ambassador in Macedonia, who from the first glance could identify the victims of the shootings as &#8220;poor civilian Kosovars killed by cruel Serbs&#8221;. How all this ended? The USA said, that Serbs had lost their moral right to govern Kosovo.</p>
<p>What happens with Ossetia is pretty similar. Ossetians wanted to separate from Georgia. There was inter-ethnic conflict with a lot of civilian casualties and destructions. Russians protected Ossetians by sending their peacekeepers there. They promised them further protection. They said they would not allow any military actions by Georgians. Ossetians  denied access for Georgian to their area. They had their own elections, they kept provoking Georgians by shooting at their villages. And Russians blamed Georgians all the time. This time Georgians attacked the Ossetian capital causing heavy civilian casualties. Russians called it &#8220;genocide&#8221; and &#8220;humanitarian catastrophe&#8221;. They intervened to push Georgians out of Koso&#8230; err, form S. Ossetia. Where you see the difference?<br />
That Milosevich was &#8220;a thug&#8221; and Saakashvilly is &#8220;a nice guy&#8221;? Well, this is a matter of tastes. And how can you explain it to the dead Ossetians?<br />
What is next? I think Russians are going to make a statement that Georgia lost its moral right to govern S. Ossetia and Abkhazia&#8230;<br />
P.S. Separation of this two regions from is the Russian objective. The pipe stays aside and has nothing to do with this Russian operation. The pipe is not the Georgian only property. It was built with the money from a few Western oil companies, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey. Russia has good relations with all of them other than Georgia. Russia&#8217;s oil business is going well. She is getting her dollars- this pipe is not an obstacle. Why would Russia go after the pipe? Just to get in troubles?</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belmont Club &#187; Voluntary amputation</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4510</link>
		<dc:creator>Belmont Club &#187; Voluntary amputation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4510</guid>
		<description>[...] Drift, it is the inner &#8220;bags of mealies&#8221; wall. In the comments section of an earlier post, I wrote: The Poles were encircled and cut off from each other by a forward defense strategy that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Drift, it is the inner &#8220;bags of mealies&#8221; wall. In the comments section of an earlier post, I wrote: The Poles were encircled and cut off from each other by a forward defense strategy that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russian Bear</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4507</link>
		<dc:creator>Russian Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4507</guid>
		<description>To &lt;b&gt;Konyok:&lt;/b&gt;
I wish I could &quot;make international news&quot;, but the things, you seem to be not aware of, are well known to the world and had been published million times. Just make search on &quot;USA, Iraq chemical weapon&quot;. I just picked a few links:
http://www.counterpunch.org/boles1010.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/31/world/main534798.shtml
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0908-08.htm
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980DE5DE1F3DF932A15751C1A9649C8B63
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2005/nov/15/usa.iraq
The USSR had a planned economy, which was not competitive in quality of the goods. And the economy they had was totally destroyed in 1990-th. So, Russia almost started her market economy from scratch. Russian businessmen do what is profitable. This is market after all. Nobody can say: &quot;You, Ivan open a factory to make this, and you Misha have to produce that!&quot; This is why Russia has to sell the raw materials and weapons. She sells what she has to sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To <b>Konyok:</b><br />
I wish I could &#8220;make international news&#8221;, but the things, you seem to be not aware of, are well known to the world and had been published million times. Just make search on &#8220;USA, Iraq chemical weapon&#8221;. I just picked a few links:<br />
<a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/boles1010.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.counterpunch.org/boles1010.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/31/world/main534798.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/31/world/main534798.shtml</a><br />
<a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0908-08.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0908-08.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980DE5DE1F3DF932A15751C1A9649C8B63" rel="nofollow">http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980DE5DE1F3DF932A15751C1A9649C8B63</a><br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2005/nov/15/usa.iraq" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2005/nov/15/usa.iraq</a><br />
The USSR had a planned economy, which was not competitive in quality of the goods. And the economy they had was totally destroyed in 1990-th. So, Russia almost started her market economy from scratch. Russian businessmen do what is profitable. This is market after all. Nobody can say: &#8220;You, Ivan open a factory to make this, and you Misha have to produce that!&#8221; This is why Russia has to sell the raw materials and weapons. She sells what she has to sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry O.</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4500</guid>
		<description>Estonia sending cyber defense experts to Georgia:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30935</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estonia sending cyber defense experts to Georgia:<br />
<a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30935" rel="nofollow">http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/30935</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4493</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4493</guid>
		<description>buddy,

I think he&#039;s fled the thread.  Just another Russian who&#039;s following orders and making the required appearance.  And you won&#039;t get an honest answer from the likes of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buddy,</p>
<p>I think he&#8217;s fled the thread.  Just another Russian who&#8217;s following orders and making the required appearance.  And you won&#8217;t get an honest answer from the likes of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy larsen</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4480</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy larsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4480</guid>
		<description>What about Grozny? Why isn&#039;t Kosovo payback for Grozny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Grozny? Why isn&#8217;t Kosovo payback for Grozny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4452</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4452</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m getting tired of hearing that ridiculous meme propagated by the Buchanan people that Georgia is payback for Kosovo.  They are not related, since there is nothing similar about the countries, resources, location, or even &quot;security&quot; interests for the Russians.  Putin was beating his chest about Kosovo (admittedly it was a mistake on our part to give Muslims a state in Europe)in order to build himself up as the hero of the Slavs.  Kosovo was propaganda b.s. for Russia, and nothing more.  I just cannot believe how credulous and stupid the paleo-cons can be.

Georgia is about resources, location, and to cow all the other former satellites into line.  It is about denying Europe the oil from the pipeline.  It is about telling Western Europe that Russia owns them and everyone knows it.

&quot;Calling on hypocrats&quot; you are a dope if you cannot see the details and the differences.  You are an agent of dizinformatzia because you are falsely conflating the two countries which have nothing in common in any sense whatsoever.

This stupid and shallow argument keeps making the rounds in the blog world and I am utterly amazed that it has the life it has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m getting tired of hearing that ridiculous meme propagated by the Buchanan people that Georgia is payback for Kosovo.  They are not related, since there is nothing similar about the countries, resources, location, or even &#8220;security&#8221; interests for the Russians.  Putin was beating his chest about Kosovo (admittedly it was a mistake on our part to give Muslims a state in Europe)in order to build himself up as the hero of the Slavs.  Kosovo was propaganda b.s. for Russia, and nothing more.  I just cannot believe how credulous and stupid the paleo-cons can be.</p>
<p>Georgia is about resources, location, and to cow all the other former satellites into line.  It is about denying Europe the oil from the pipeline.  It is about telling Western Europe that Russia owns them and everyone knows it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Calling on hypocrats&#8221; you are a dope if you cannot see the details and the differences.  You are an agent of dizinformatzia because you are falsely conflating the two countries which have nothing in common in any sense whatsoever.</p>
<p>This stupid and shallow argument keeps making the rounds in the blog world and I am utterly amazed that it has the life it has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Kellogg</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/comment-page-6/#comment-4446</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Kellogg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/08/10/whos-winning-georgia-part-2/#comment-4446</guid>
		<description>I see the puti-trolls are still at it. Bloviation writ dumb. As author Harlan Ellison put it, &quot;You have the right to your own opinion. You don&#039;t have the right to your own facts.&quot;

Last I heard Gori has fallen. No word on the state of the Georgian army, one can only hope it remains in fighting shape. Since Tbilisi is in rough terrain it&#039;s likely the Russians will be slowed down

According to one map I&#039;ve seen Georgia has a third autonomous region on the border with Turkey. Will Ankara occupy the region to deny it to the Russians? Will the region become a safe haven for Georgians? What would the Russians do if presented with such a fiat accompli?

As for Azerbaijan and Armenia, is anybody keeping an eye on them? Any word on what they&#039;re doing? The last I checked Armenia has evacuated their citizens in Georgia, and has assisted foreign nationals in evacuating. I have emailed an Armenian news agency, but have yet received no reply.

Are talks ongoing between Turkey, Armenia, and Azerbaijan regarding intervention on Georgia&#039;s behalf? Is Washington consulting with the three concerning actions to be taken. While the four countries --- Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan --- have their differences, they are united by their alliances with the United States. Given the prospect of a starving bear on their borders, will they fight alongside an eagle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the puti-trolls are still at it. Bloviation writ dumb. As author Harlan Ellison put it, &#8220;You have the right to your own opinion. You don&#8217;t have the right to your own facts.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last I heard Gori has fallen. No word on the state of the Georgian army, one can only hope it remains in fighting shape. Since Tbilisi is in rough terrain it&#8217;s likely the Russians will be slowed down</p>
<p>According to one map I&#8217;ve seen Georgia has a third autonomous region on the border with Turkey. Will Ankara occupy the region to deny it to the Russians? Will the region become a safe haven for Georgians? What would the Russians do if presented with such a fiat accompli?</p>
<p>As for Azerbaijan and Armenia, is anybody keeping an eye on them? Any word on what they&#8217;re doing? The last I checked Armenia has evacuated their citizens in Georgia, and has assisted foreign nationals in evacuating. I have emailed an Armenian news agency, but have yet received no reply.</p>
<p>Are talks ongoing between Turkey, Armenia, and Azerbaijan regarding intervention on Georgia&#8217;s behalf? Is Washington consulting with the three concerning actions to be taken. While the four countries &#8212; Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan &#8212; have their differences, they are united by their alliances with the United States. Given the prospect of a starving bear on their borders, will they fight alongside an eagle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
