Comments on: Acceptance

By: Ms. Know

Ms. Know — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:12:12 +0000

Wait till we have the muslim influence deep here in the US, led by the liberal illuminati party.

By: Al_Batross

Al_Batross — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:36:45 +0000

“There are around 1.5 million Muslims in Britain, a million of whom live in London” – Mike Sylwester.

The 1.5 million figure is wrong, and the Telegraph should know better than to quote it.
It may have been correct in the 1980s, but the high birth-rate and uncontrolled immigration of the last 10 years mean that the Muslim population of Britain is now at least double that, and may well be triple that.
The goverment will have a more accurate figure, derived from National Insurance and other official processes, which it is choosing not to share with us.
This Labour government is borrowing at a rate equivalent to that during 1945, when Britain still had the second-largest Navy in the world, a huge and modern Air Force, and armies in action across Europe and the Far East.
Why does it need to borrow so much ? There are many reasons, but the funding of Muslim immigration and the consequences thereof is a major factor, increasing costs in almost every area of national life.
Labour is no longer the party of the working (blue-collar) man, it is now The Party of Islam, and so I see little chance of any real improvement for as long as it remains in office.

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:41:58 +0000

The crime rate in the UK is continuing to grow. Parts of London are dangerous. The criminal gangs have automatic weapons while guns are banned.

By: krontekag

krontekag — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 07:20:05 +0000

Mike Sylwester: “Those sharia courts affect only the few Muslims who prefer to use those courts to settle their own disputes with each other. Nobody else is subject to those courts’ decisions.”

Frog in the pot, Mike…. the temperature is rising, and forces inimical to Western culture are taking baby steps right now, but are gaining in confidence with each such victory.

By: Karen

Karen — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:17:47 +0000

NahnCee, I’ve no insight into how Mike thinks but you may be right that to him they’re just animals, or at least nothing to bother about. There’s certainly something callous at worst in his comments or at best comfortably complacent.

By: NahnCee

NahnCee — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:06:06 +0000

Don’t you suppose that Mike thinks that Muslims are animals anyway, so who cares what they do to each other. THe problem with that attitude is that pretty soon they start doing it to everyone else around them, too, in the sure certainty that their Islamic law will back them up. That’s it’s OK to kill infidels, that it’s OK to rape CHristian women, that it’s OK to harass and torment Jews, etc., etc., bloody etc .

By: Karen

Karen — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:42:32 +0000

Mike Sylwester, it doesn’t help to cite from the article the numbers of Muslims in proportion to the rest of the population. The fact is, with this partial acceptance of sharia law in Britain – which is due to the influence of Muslims living in Britain, regardless of how many there are – a primary principle of Western society, i.e, equality in law, is rendered null and void for some citizens. But I guess, judging from your remarks, that doesn’t worry you; you’re okay with that.

By: Meredith

Meredith — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:29:31 +0000

Correction: As in settle their disputes with sharia law over British law.

By: Meredith

Meredith — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:27:56 +0000

So Mike, can a muslim get the OK to do stuff that is illegal for other Brits? As in settle their disputes with sharia law which over British law.

By: Mike Sylwester

Mike Sylwester — Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:12:00 +0000

Karen:
“if Muslims have so little influence, how do explain the acceptance of a parallel sharia law for domestic matters in Britain?”
———

Those sharia courts affect only the few Muslims who prefer to use those courts to settle their own disputes with each other. Nobody else is subject to those courts’ decisions.