Excuse me? Which? Where? When?

It’s taken as an axiom of truth by Democrats that all Republicans are corrupt. Concepts like evidence and truth doesn’t bother them much. They blamed Delay in Texas for corrupting an electoral system that was already corrupted, i.e. by Democrats, to the point where something like 45% of the Democrat vote controlled about 55% of the Texas legislative and Federal Congressional seats in Texas.

I have a real problem with people, usually the main stream Democrat-owned news media (MSDM), who will acknowledge a Democrat sin only when it’s is all but undeniable, but then immediately try to trivialize it by saying “…but they all do it, I mean, look at what those Republicans do!”. I watched (via news reports) a sitting Vice President and Presidential candidate attempt to steal a Presidential election in broad daylight in 2000. I watched the media and Democrats defend the indefensible. I saw every single military absentee ballot challenged by a Democrat lawyer, and that most were thrown out or failed to make it to the ballot box for counting in Democrat counties. I’ve seen Democrats trying to twist and remold election results in ways that have nothing to do with “voter education” or “get out the vote”. I don’t know what you know about Republican efforts at voter fraud, but I don’t think it happens. If and when it does, no Republican will support it, or the politician.

Gerrymandering was the first corruption of the nation’s elections, with the idea that the politicians could slice and dice precincts to maximize congressional seats (and therefore political power and patronage) for one party over the other, regardless of how the body politic actually voted. I’m actually surprised that California passed proposition 11, but it was close, and there are lots of way for the rulers-that-be to defeat a trivial thing like law or the will of the people. (Example: California’s Constitution forbids running a deficit, and California’s been running a deficit for about 10 years now.)

The issue of integrity of the ballot is vitally important, that and the Constitution that supposedly governs us. Without that, there will ultimately be bullets flying. Maybe not today, but “disenfranchisement” will ultimately result in in some sort of civil war. One must follow the other. (And, as long as Americans DO have an effective right to vote and the Constitutional rule of law, rebellion could never be justified.)

Seems, if we aren’t piqued too bluntly by a phlebotomist’s capillary, we can be bled slowly without noticing.

The vampire bats of central America learned this a long time ago. So did the Masai peoples of Africa.

Makes one wonder if America isn’t under a concerted attack?

I hope I have expressed that in a clear fashion. And I apologize for the typos.

That is why motor voter is so important to the Dems, it is a matter not of record but of convenience. Other examples of voter suppression include but are not limited to attempts to ensure the registered voter is the same as the person who shows up to vote, via photo id or verifying signatures and demanding that voters registered in a certain location use that polling place and that polling place only to cast their ballot, as well as the time frame for which the vote needs to be cast. Allotting the allowable polling places can be seen as a means of demographically suppressing the vote.

Other forms of voter suppression (formerly associated with the Democrat party) include the pole tax and literacy tests. It should not be surprising that like the current testing done in order to determine graduate-ability for high schools, the tests can be skewed to support an increase in salaries for a job well done one week to a desperate cry for assistance for a hopeless challenge the next. Motor voter and the vote by mail movement has eliminated all of the aforementioned attempts to suppress voting. The only real vote suppression currently on going is the suppression of ballots of US Military members overseas, as in the grand tradition of Albert Gore in 2000, and others enforcing technicalities which would eliminate the votes of our fighting men and women because the ballots cannot physically arrive be filled out and then returned to the precinct of record in time for the election especially if the ballots are not sent out until four or in some cases two weeks prior to the close of the elections. This is very much the case were challenges as to the appearance.

I do believe that all election boards in the country are manned by members of both parties so the fraud can’t be to obvious or someone will catch on.

It might have a bigger effect on local elections.

Why is anyone surprised that after that success they wouldn’t employ it in another close race?