@ wadeusaf
“What we are observing is the Democrat version of Richard Nixon….”

No, we are not witnessing any such thing. I was in college at that time and actively involved in the right’s counter movement to SDS: Nixon was loyal to the constitution; his “corrupt” behavior was much less than LBJ or JFK.
Nov 12, 2008 – 8:22 am

On reflection, I agree with you.

It is the dirty campaign tricks mentality I was referring to which allowed a break in to occur, that also allows this disconnect of security measures which would reject the kinds of fraudulent donations. Neither are in and of themselves assaults on the Constitution as much as they are indicative of a perception of being above certain of our laws.

It is an attitude which must not go unrewarded, it is an attitude which ought to be rejected by the President elect as well as by the Democrat Party. The fact that they are not is telling.

What can be done, period?

Is there still any chance of an electronic trail or database?

According to Newsmax in an article on October 21st, Obama’s campaign hired the company Chase Paymentech to process its online transactions.

Wouldn’t Chase Paymentech presumably have a record of the #s of the credit cards that were used? Can those records be gotten hold of?

I’m neither a lawyer nor a programmer who would understand how such a database would work.

Thoughts, anyone?

China is still growing. I’ll let others assign an age to her capitalist markets.

Damn clever, those Progressive Jews.

Yes, it is true that Progressive Jews voted overwhelmingly for Obama, and as a Jew, I was pretty pissed about it, but the canard about Jews controlling everything is the usual Protocols-of-the-Elders-of-Zion bullshit.

Gets old. Go piss up a rope.

Have you seen the Chinese, in recent history, deal with a real problem?

I’ll hold my bets on China until after seeing them weather the current economic malaise.

Derek

La langue anglaise she not my langue maternelle (dis mean mudder tongue for American guy).

I make big mistake, une grosse erreur; I say “devious” what is bad English word I don’ hunnerstan too good.

I don’ mean say “devious”; I really really, vraiement mean say “subtile” or “nuance”, des bons mots francais, not “devious”. Never, never “devious”, jamais.

I hapologize ten tousand times; I don’ wan’ go en prison. I don’ like les manacles any more. (Dis mean handcuff.)

Da freedom of da speech is American concep’.

We don’ got dat hup in da nort. Don’ need dat stuff.

Nex’ time I vote for le Quebec libre and contre le racism institutionel des canadiens anglais

Au revoir & Bye-bye.

Cosmeau Mauvaiseherbe deBugle

P.S.

Snap quiz:

“We will stun you with our ingratitude.”

Who said it? When?

Does it in any way relate to what was done to the naive and foolish right in the U.S. election?

Where is Iraq, anyway?

The Bush DoJ has been in the tank for the Dems from day one. Think of the Scooter Libby railroad job, and then ask yourself why is Congressman William Jefferson still walking around – what is it – three years since the FBI found a load of cash in his refrigerator.

Until the Pubs get some spine, we will no longer be a nation under the rule of law. Obama will go through the motions and appearances of enforcing and obeying the law when it is convenient. But when it is not- look out.