<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pirate&#8217;s Life For Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/</link>
	<description>Just another Pajamasmedia.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:48:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Links for November 25th 2008 &#8212; LimbicNutrition Weblog</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23532</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for November 25th 2008 &#8212; LimbicNutrition Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23532</guid>
		<description>[...] Belmont Club &#187; A Pirate&#8217;s Life For Me - &quot;It is legally more dangerous to apprehend a pirate than to let him go. If you actual succeeded, it might be necessary to grant them asylum.&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Belmont Club &raquo; A Pirate&rsquo;s Life For Me &#8211; &quot;It is legally more dangerous to apprehend a pirate than to let him go. If you actual succeeded, it might be necessary to grant them asylum.&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aristide</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23494</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23494</guid>
		<description>LOL!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23485</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23485</guid>
		<description>Hey Aristide, I got and idea for a new variety of Q-Ship.

The soft target sails into pirate-laden waters
where it is promptly seized. 

Then the pirates find out that the cargo is 
Gitmo detainees.

Wonder who will pay their ranson?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Aristide, I got and idea for a new variety of Q-Ship.</p>
<p>The soft target sails into pirate-laden waters<br />
where it is promptly seized. </p>
<p>Then the pirates find out that the cargo is<br />
Gitmo detainees.</p>
<p>Wonder who will pay their ranson?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aristide</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23467</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23467</guid>
		<description>What is need is some &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-ship&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Q-ships&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is need is some <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q-ship" rel="nofollow">Q-ships</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAH</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23407</link>
		<dc:creator>RAH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23407</guid>
		<description>The Indian Navy is a new brash navy. The Indians had just paid a large ransom for an Indian captain and crew to the Somali pirates and feelings are high to do something against the pirates. At least the Indian Navy had the description of the pirate ship and the pirates made the mistake of firing at the Indian Navy ship which then blew them out of the water.

The waters are a large area. The Russians are starting to do escort duties of freighters which is a traditional naval duty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Indian Navy is a new brash navy. The Indians had just paid a large ransom for an Indian captain and crew to the Somali pirates and feelings are high to do something against the pirates. At least the Indian Navy had the description of the pirate ship and the pirates made the mistake of firing at the Indian Navy ship which then blew them out of the water.</p>
<p>The waters are a large area. The Russians are starting to do escort duties of freighters which is a traditional naval duty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkftl</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23324</link>
		<dc:creator>jkftl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 23:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23324</guid>
		<description>OK NahnCee  I agree with your first point.  Since 1965 DoD has had ability to read license plates from satellites.  It would be childs play to move one of the &#039;eye in the sky&#039; units to a position over this subject region.  When the operator/observer/AI computer program spots suspicious vessel activity there would be plenty of time to call in any kind of response to prevent piracy.

Just stationing repelling forces on ships won&#039;t work. First of all you would need a big detail on EVERY ship of attractive size, three shifts of guard duty.  Then all it takes is ONE 1950s-technology RPG-7 into the wheelhouse and the ship is theirs, regardless of on-board forces.  Needless to say, just a credible threat of such an attack is enough to force capitulation.

As in SO MUCH of life&#039;s activities these days, it isn&#039;t logic or reason that determines the behavior of the ship&#039;s crew.  It&#039;s the INSUROR who calls the shots.  The directive today is &quot;Don&#039;t Resist&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK NahnCee  I agree with your first point.  Since 1965 DoD has had ability to read license plates from satellites.  It would be childs play to move one of the &#8216;eye in the sky&#8217; units to a position over this subject region.  When the operator/observer/AI computer program spots suspicious vessel activity there would be plenty of time to call in any kind of response to prevent piracy.</p>
<p>Just stationing repelling forces on ships won&#8217;t work. First of all you would need a big detail on EVERY ship of attractive size, three shifts of guard duty.  Then all it takes is ONE 1950s-technology RPG-7 into the wheelhouse and the ship is theirs, regardless of on-board forces.  Needless to say, just a credible threat of such an attack is enough to force capitulation.</p>
<p>As in SO MUCH of life&#8217;s activities these days, it isn&#8217;t logic or reason that determines the behavior of the ship&#8217;s crew.  It&#8217;s the INSUROR who calls the shots.  The directive today is &#8220;Don&#8217;t Resist&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaska Paul</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23293</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaska Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23293</guid>
		<description>W/R/T the ACLU:  One will not find them in dangerous waters.  They are basically anti establishment types that thrive in the environment of freedom that allow them to game our institutions to our detriment.  If it weren&#039;t for our military people doing their jobs in vacation spots like Djibouti, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other places we generally don&#039;t know about, the ACLU types would not be plying their trade.  Our tolerance is a two edge sword:  it is our greatest strength and our greatest weakness.  People like CAIR, ACLU, foreign terrorists, and the like look upon it as a weakness to be exploited.

Take a look at the UK and see the logical end that irrational tolerance will bring you.  There are limits.  Freedom without responsibility becomes license, and a society that adopts that philosophy will wither away and die.

Getting back to piracy:  those seafaring nations having flagged vessels need to step up to the plate and deal with this situation around the Gulf of Aden and Somalia, as well as around places in Nigeria, Chittagong, Straits of Malacca, etc. Of course, flags of convenience ships like those flying the Panamanian and Liberian flags have their a$$es in a crack.  Cheap registrations are like cheap parachutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W/R/T the ACLU:  One will not find them in dangerous waters.  They are basically anti establishment types that thrive in the environment of freedom that allow them to game our institutions to our detriment.  If it weren&#8217;t for our military people doing their jobs in vacation spots like Djibouti, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other places we generally don&#8217;t know about, the ACLU types would not be plying their trade.  Our tolerance is a two edge sword:  it is our greatest strength and our greatest weakness.  People like CAIR, ACLU, foreign terrorists, and the like look upon it as a weakness to be exploited.</p>
<p>Take a look at the UK and see the logical end that irrational tolerance will bring you.  There are limits.  Freedom without responsibility becomes license, and a society that adopts that philosophy will wither away and die.</p>
<p>Getting back to piracy:  those seafaring nations having flagged vessels need to step up to the plate and deal with this situation around the Gulf of Aden and Somalia, as well as around places in Nigeria, Chittagong, Straits of Malacca, etc. Of course, flags of convenience ships like those flying the Panamanian and Liberian flags have their a$$es in a crack.  Cheap registrations are like cheap parachutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenny</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23276</link>
		<dc:creator>glenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23276</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see.  Find out the little strip of &quot;harbor&quot; facilities in Somalia where all the little pirate ships go to refuel and refit.  Call in B-52/B-1 arc light strike from, say, Diego Garcia.  No overflight restrictions or permissions to get, not very far from an intercontinental bomber point of view, etc.  I say, &quot;Kill &#039;em all&quot;.  glenny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see.  Find out the little strip of &#8220;harbor&#8221; facilities in Somalia where all the little pirate ships go to refuel and refit.  Call in B-52/B-1 arc light strike from, say, Diego Garcia.  No overflight restrictions or permissions to get, not very far from an intercontinental bomber point of view, etc.  I say, &#8220;Kill &#8216;em all&#8221;.  glenny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomw</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23253</link>
		<dc:creator>tomw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23253</guid>
		<description>Sec. 1651. Piracy under law of nations

Whoever, on the high seas, commits the crime of piracy as defined by the law of nations, and is afterwards brought into or found in the United States, shall be imprisoned for life.

See:
http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2007/06/why-do-we-refuse-to-call-terrorism-for.html

 For one way to look at Gitmo, pirates and generally speaking, non-States who attack nations.

tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sec. 1651. Piracy under law of nations</p>
<p>Whoever, on the high seas, commits the crime of piracy as defined by the law of nations, and is afterwards brought into or found in the United States, shall be imprisoned for life.</p>
<p>See:<br />
<a href="http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2007/06/why-do-we-refuse-to-call-terrorism-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2007/06/why-do-we-refuse-to-call-terrorism-for.html</a></p>
<p> For one way to look at Gitmo, pirates and generally speaking, non-States who attack nations.</p>
<p>tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RWE</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/2008/11/21/a-pirates-life-for-me/comment-page-1/#comment-23238</link>
		<dc:creator>RWE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/richardfernandez/?p=1079#comment-23238</guid>
		<description>Nahncee:  You misunderstand me.  Actually, if the lawyers were cruising around a pirate-infested area, the problem would probably get fixed real fast.  But my point was that if you killed the pirates attacking a ship and do not succeed in killing all of them in one blow, then any survivors will sue you down to the waterline and then some.

If they don&#039;t have them money, no problem.  The ACLU will do the work pro bono and various ambulance chaser shysters will do it for a percentage of the take.  Sean Penn and Oliver Stone will rush to make a movie, starring Johnny Dep.  Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will chant &quot;No piracy, no peace!&quot;  Susan Surandon will be see wearing a &quot;Free Blackbeard!&quot; T-shirt.  Disney will rename their ride &quot;Pirates of the Somali Coast.&quot;  The Supreme Court will rule that they were not read their rights before the Harpoon missile smashed into their ship and the pirates will end up owning the Potomac Yacht Club.   

Back in the 90&#039;s two crooks wearing bullet proof vests and carrying AK-47&#039;s robbed a bank in North Hollywood.  They shot up the neighborhood with impunity for an extended period, until the police put down their puny handguns, got AR-15&#039;s from a local gun store and killed them. 

And the family of those bank robbers sued the police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nahncee:  You misunderstand me.  Actually, if the lawyers were cruising around a pirate-infested area, the problem would probably get fixed real fast.  But my point was that if you killed the pirates attacking a ship and do not succeed in killing all of them in one blow, then any survivors will sue you down to the waterline and then some.</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t have them money, no problem.  The ACLU will do the work pro bono and various ambulance chaser shysters will do it for a percentage of the take.  Sean Penn and Oliver Stone will rush to make a movie, starring Johnny Dep.  Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will chant &#8220;No piracy, no peace!&#8221;  Susan Surandon will be see wearing a &#8220;Free Blackbeard!&#8221; T-shirt.  Disney will rename their ride &#8220;Pirates of the Somali Coast.&#8221;  The Supreme Court will rule that they were not read their rights before the Harpoon missile smashed into their ship and the pirates will end up owning the Potomac Yacht Club.   </p>
<p>Back in the 90&#8217;s two crooks wearing bullet proof vests and carrying AK-47&#8217;s robbed a bank in North Hollywood.  They shot up the neighborhood with impunity for an extended period, until the police put down their puny handguns, got AR-15&#8217;s from a local gun store and killed them. </p>
<p>And the family of those bank robbers sued the police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
