1) An ideology that completely mirrors the ideology of this past 8 years.
2) An ideology that recognizes the few while completely disregarding the masses.
3) An ideology that believes in taking military action against Iraq, an incident that is completely unrelated to 9/11, without solidifying our claims beforehand. In the present, we have found no evidence of weapons of mass destructions or a tie to Osama Bin Laden. The devastation of this war has cost us over 4,000 of our brave troops and counting, over 1/2 trillion dollars of taxpayer’s money and counting, and over 1 million Iraqi lives unrelated to the terrorists or insurgency.

Cost of the Iraq War — http://www.nationalpriorities.org/costofwar_home

4) An ideology that still believes that the Iraq War is the right war on terrorism when the Afghanistan War should had been the right war on terrorism, where Osama Bin Laden actually was until he slipped into the mountains and into Pakistan’s territory now. The Iraq War also diverted our attention away from the Afghanistan War. We now have extended our resources in two separate places and have heightened our risk to our troops, our expenses, and creating another dilemma that will take quite some time to finalize. The Iraq War will not go away overnight and it is now our obligation to see it all the way through for God knows how many more years. This has also been the most unpopular war in the eyes of the world’s communities.
5) An ideology that believes that we are at our safest state since 9/11, when a recent terrorist plot was still trying to enter Great Britain’s airports with liquid explosives heading directly to us, but thankfully the plot was foiled. While in Afghanistan, the terrorists are regrouping and strengthening and we have recently suffered another high casualty to our troops yet again within this past month. We currently have the least amount of alliances in the world’s communities due to this unpopular Iraq War. True national securities are the ties that bind us to our world’s communities and the ties that bind them to us.
6) An ideology that vetted one of the most inexperience VP ticket in history, from foreign policies to national defense. If God forbids that anything happens to this President if elected and is stricken with illness, this VP will be running the country. For a more compelling look at Sarah Palin’s VP readiness, please look at these links below —

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loUHRv3ipLE

http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/election_2008/2008/09/30/palin_gaffes/

7) An ideology that believes in “the fundamentals of our economy are strong” while we are facing the highest mortgage foreclosure crisis, high unemployment rate, and the largest collapse of our financial infrastructures since The Great Depression of 1929.

This is an ideology that many of us in America are against. Whether this ideology is in the Republican or Democratic ticket is not the main issue but the fact is that America does not want to fall into another 4 more years of devastation. We cannot afford this anymore.

1) Yes, McCain changed his mind on drilling… when gas hit $4/gl. you got a problem with that?

2) The Gramm-Leach-Bliley act did not promote predatroy loans. It allowed banks to diversify their activities. Those banks that did are the ones who are doing better in this crisis. The investment houses are not covered by banking regulations. Those are the ones that are failing. Some banks are failing, but that happens every year.

3) Keating 5 – McCain and Glenn were exonerated. They were only slapped, because it was a Dem Congress. The real malefactprs were the other 3… ALL DEMS. The Dems had to cover themselves politically, so they slapped the 2 ‘Pubs, also… for nothing but political cover. McCain was innocent of wrongdoing. It did open his eyes to how corruption works….

4) McCain was right. The experts agree that the fundamentals are storng. All the indicators are there. This Financial mess can be contained, and if it’s done right, the economy won’t really suffer. If McCain’s bill in 2005 had not been blocked by the Dems, we wouldn’t have this mess.

5) Both campaigns made the same pledges about playing nice. They are. Compared to previous campaigns, this is nice! Blame goes both ways. Don’t give me this crud about Obama just defending himself.

6) Obama supporters should not get into McCain’s flip-flops. Obama does it every two days. he has no voting record of note, so he takes whatever position he wants. In the debate, when talking about Iran, he stated, “Sanctions don’t work!” ONE MINUTE LATER, He stated, “We need more sanctions!” He never gets challenged by the media on these things. He says it with authority, so sheeple believe him, but it’s all crap. Every position is either vague or all crap. You can’t point to a single one of his positions that doesn’t fit into one of these two categories… unless it’s one taken from one of his opponents.

So, Jeff, go over to the Lib sites and spread your message. They like it there. The critical thinkers here will bust your chops every time.

I’ve been saying this for months now. Four years ago my wife and I bought a condo. We actually looked at what we could have afforded, not what we wanted, and we made compromises. If we’d done what some of these other folks did, we could have wound up in a nicer property, maybe a house, and now someone else would be on the hook for a tax increase to subsidize our mortgage. Honest people don’t get cheated, true, but they also don’t reap illicit benefits; it seems the latter are not disreputable any more.

1) McCain was previously against oil drilling in ANWR, Alaska; off the coast of Florida; off the coast of the Gulf of Mexico; and off the coast of California. Now he is for “drill baby drill”.
2) McCain was against Federal regulations of America’s largest financial institutions like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG. On May 6, 1999, he voted for the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which led to the banking deregulation that allowed the mortgage industry to adopt predatory loan practices that offered mortgages to those with a poor or thin credit history who had unreliable or low incomes and could not pay it back later on. Take a look at the compelling details below —

http://thetruthorsomethinglikeit.blogspot.com/2008/09/mccain-voted-for-mortgage-crisis.html

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s1999-105

3) Now, after these financial institutions are collapsing, he is promoting Federal regulations to control them so that this crisis will not happen again. He now wants more Federal regulations of Wall Street altogether. Wouldn’t this be considered as socialism that most conservatives do not want? Also, please do not forget McCain’s past involvement in the Keating Five as an example that his future plans for Federal regulations of financial institutions will not work —

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keating_Five

4) McCain has said over and over that, “the fundamentals of our economy are strong” in reference to our economy. Now, he states that he was referring to the American workers as being the backbone of our economy? This reference is only made after Obama has contested his refusal to accept that our country is in a financial crisis. Maybe this is McCain’s way of defusing his stance of denial.
5) McCain has stated since the beginning of the Republican campaign that he will fight a good and honest campaign without resorting to dirty politics of using smear tactics. Now, most of the McCain’s campaign ads against Obama are smear campaigns that even The New York Times, The Washington Post, The LA Times, Newsweek, and various other major news agencies have declared as false information using very dirty politics. Most of the Obama’s campaign ads have been on the defense to all of these false accusations by the McCain’s campaign ads.
6) For more changes of McCain, please look at the link below —

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/flipflops

In this election, there are in fact two forms of changes. One form of “Change” is being promoted by a candidate who wants to transform this country for the better, while the other form of “Change” is being promoted by another candidate of his own transformation to capture the hearts of the American public. Which form of “Change” do we want as a country?