This year marks the 20th anniversary of Allan Bloom’s incendiary book The Closing of the American Mind. By some stupendous oversight on the part of the management, I was asked to review the book for The New York Times Book Review. They didn’t make that sort of mistake again, especially after Bloom’s book became a number-one bestseller. In fairness to the Times editors, though, they couldn’t have known that such a peculiar book by a then-obscure professor of philosophy was poised to become important ammunition on (for them) the wrong side of the culture wars. (Nor for that matter could they known that I would do my bit for the cause with books like Tenured Radicals. Indeed, part of the genius of the title of Bloom’s book was its ambiguity. I remember visiting a liberal friend when I was toting around galley’s of the book. “The Closing of the American Mind, eh?” she said. “What’s that about, Reagan’s America?” Well, not quite, Virginia, but you see where she was coming from.
Anyway, the anniversary of Bloom’s book has occasioned a few events and celebrations, including a symposium organized jointly by The Manhattan Institute’s Center for the American University and The New Criterion. We published a selection of the papers in the November issue of The New Criterion, and if you missed the CSPAN broadcast of the conference itself, you can watch the proceedings here.





PJM Home
The New Criterion
The Rape of the Masters: How Political Correctness Sabotages Art
Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse
Art’s Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity
Experiments Against Reality: The Fate of Culture in the Postmodern Age
Tenured Radicals, NEW, EXPANDED EDITION FALL 2008! How Politics has Corrupted our Higher Education
Counterpoints: 25 Years of The New Criterion on Culture and the Arts
The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America
Against the Idols of the Age
Lengthened Shadows: America and Its Institutions in the Twenty-First Century
The Survival of Culture: Permanent Values in a Virtual Age
Physics and Politics, by Walter Bagehot, edited with an
Introduction by Roger Kimball
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
3 Comments
1. Robbins:Professor Kimball,
I listened to your interesting presentation as well as that of one of the respondents. However, I was unable to hear the other respondent(s) because the video clip ended too soon.
Could you please make sure that your audience has access to the complete presentation of lectures on Allan Bloom available?
Thank you kindly and thank you for your excellent work.
Nov 29, 2007 - 7:41 pm 2. Richard Whalen:Mr. Kimball,
I’m unable to access Armavirumque and The New Criterion online, I buy your books, Audio books and subscribe to your magazine. I consider you my most important source of intellectual and cultural education. This problem started last summer when the web site when on vacation. Don’t you like Nebraskans or something?
Signed, Frustrated.
Nov 30, 2007 - 10:35 am 3. Randall Gremillion:Mr. Kimball:
Thank you for writing and remembering. I read Mr. Bloom’s book on its publication and for me its ideas hit home and served as the catalyst of a long journey from fuzzy-headed, “everything is permitted” pseudo-intellectual to fuzzy-headed, sober neocon. I wonder how many others trod that same path after reading The Closing of the American Mind?
Dec 3, 2007 - 10:07 am