Well, that’s the headline I would like to see. Instead, I woke to this: Chavez threatens to cut U.S. oil supply over vote. “Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez,” began the Reuters report, “threatened on Friday to halt the OPEC nation’s oil sales to the United States, seeking to fire up his leftist supporters for a weekend referendum on expanding his powers.” Good idea! It’s about time we started turning off the spigot of gushing barrels of petrodollars to neanderthal regimes. (This is an idea Raymond Learsy powerfully argues in a new edition of his book Over a Barrel: Breaking Oil’s Grip on Our Future.) Chavez is a tinpot dictator who nuisance factor is ramped up only because he is awash in cash–cash that the U.S. is chiefly responsible for supplying by gobbling up OPEC’s oil at extortionist prices. The alternative? Well, to begin with, increase US oil production, tap into our strategic oil reserves, and aggressively search for oil in such promising spots as Alaska. The polar bears will just have to mosey over to a new spot. Of course, that’s only a first step. We also need to bring more nuclear power plants online as quickly as possible and we need to do some serious research into alternatives to fossil fuels. It will be a nice day when the OPEC bullies–among whom Chavez is only a bit player–return to being mere loudmouth irritations instead, as they are now, worrisome thugs.
P.S., Chavez also threatened on Friday “to cut ties with Spain and nationalize Spanish businesses in Venezuela if King Juan Carlos does not apologize for telling him to ’shut up’ at a recent summit in Chile.” My advice to King Juan Carlos: take a page out of Dirty Harry’s book: “Make my day.”





PJM Home
The New Criterion
The Rape of the Masters: How Political Correctness Sabotages Art
Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse
Art’s Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity
Experiments Against Reality: The Fate of Culture in the Postmodern Age
Tenured Radicals, NEW, EXPANDED EDITION FALL 2008! How Politics has Corrupted our Higher Education
Counterpoints: 25 Years of The New Criterion on Culture and the Arts
The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America
Against the Idols of the Age
Lengthened Shadows: America and Its Institutions in the Twenty-First Century
The Survival of Culture: Permanent Values in a Virtual Age
Physics and Politics, by Walter Bagehot, edited with an
Introduction by Roger Kimball
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
2 Comments
1. LSD:Why can’t we break up OPEC and deal with countries independantly? I would think that a market like ours is powerful enough to make a good deal with Mexico, why do they need OPEC? Where would OPEC be without access to our market?
It is wrong to view the appetite for oil as an irritant in our relationship with OPEC nations; if anything it is a lubricant. The real irritants are ideological.
Dec 1, 2007 - 11:20 am 2. southdakotaboy:Yes, lets make a good deal with Mexico. Then when they start getting things fixed at home we will not have such an immigration problem.
Dec 3, 2007 - 6:52 am