Will wonders never cease? This just in from the left, I mean West, coast: people studying English as a second language learn it more effectively when they are taught grammar.
I too am flabbergasted. But there it is. Under the splendid headline “English as a proficient language,” The Oregonian reports that some 9,000 students passed the state English examination last year, up from 4,000 the year before. Why the dramatic improvement? Because, say “educators” (don’t you love that word?), “a new way of teaching that has swept Oregon” classrooms teaching English as a Second Language. The novelty? “Schools have begun explicitly teaching the grammar, rules and structure of English. And they are doing it in a carefully ordered way, making sure that students don’t miss any of the building blocks of how English verbs are conjugated, words are ordered, conversations are expected to proceed and sentences are constructed.”
What an innovation! Imagine, actually teaching grammar and all that old-hat stuff that your mother (or your grandmother, anyway) used to learn. “For a long time,” said one “educator,” “we just read to them and exposed them to English and figured they would pick it up just like native speakers do.” No doubt it took a large, multi-year government grant to figure out that, if you want to teach most people a language, you actually have to teach them the language. What a revolution in pedagogy. Possibly at the end of another huge tax-payer subsidized study, educators will discover that learning history makes for better-informed citizens–extraordinary!–or that memorizing poems and such is not only good training for a student’s memory but also gives students the gift of possessing those works–their rhythms and emotional weather–at their fingertips. What an idea, that learning “by heart” means expanding and tempering your imaginative response to life’s vicissitudes. Where, I wonder, will it end? Perhaps, in the fullness of time, educators will also discover that the best way to teach math is by teaching math–beginning with such hoary devices as the times tables and fractions and division. Someday, a long way from now, after many more research projects and expensive educational experiments, it may even be discovered that Aristotle, that old Greek, was right when he said that a proper education involves educating the emotions. Only a blockhead, he said in the Nicomachean Ethics, doesn’t believe that character is formed by behavior.
But all that is for an advanced course. For now, we should render thanks for the pioneering discovery that if you wish to teach someone a language, your best bet is to teach them the language. What an insight!



Digg This
del.icio.us

PJM Home
The New Criterion
The Rape of the Masters: How Political Correctness Sabotages Art
Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse
Art’s Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity
Experiments Against Reality: The Fate of Culture in the Postmodern Age
Tenured Radicals, NEW, EXPANDED EDITION FALL 2008! How Politics has Corrupted our Higher Education
Counterpoints: 25 Years of The New Criterion on Culture and the Arts
The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America
Against the Idols of the Age
Lengthened Shadows: America and Its Institutions in the Twenty-First Century
The Survival of Culture: Permanent Values in a Virtual Age
Physics and Politics, by Walter Bagehot, edited with an
Introduction by Roger Kimball

5 Comments
Sissy Willis:That’s the trouble with “educators.” Even a nine-year-old child who reads Science News for Kids would know that “people have a tough time learning new languages as they grow older, but infants have the ability to learn any language, even fake ones, easily.” I had thought that was common knowledge but suppose it depends upon what your definition of common is. Who is educating the “educators”?
“The rhythms and emotional weather” of learning by heart
Mar 7, 2008 - 7:27 am Mike Magaletti:Hmmm. Isn’t that why elementary schools were once called grammar schools. Oh, but that was in the old days…before we knew better.
Mar 7, 2008 - 12:58 pm heather:For the past couple of generations, we have “taught” history without those boring dates; and writing without that boring old grammar or spelling; and arithmetic without those boring old multiplication table; and because teachers have forgotten how easy it is to ‘memorize’ anything (this is the specialty of the very young), well, why have children do that boring old ‘memorization.’ Yep, it is all so BORING,all that boring old stuff. Better to haul out the crayons and paper and calculators… and learn to “think,” and ENJOY LEARNING.
I have by the way, tried to tutor high school students for that last mad dash to the final exams in algebra… and do you know, if you don’t understand RIGHT AWAY, that the factors of ‘48′ are 6 and 8 and 12, etc… you cannot factor a quadratic equation????
Do you know that if you can’t tell the difference between Queen Elizabeth I and Queen Victoria, and that they lived some 250 years apart in time… you cannot understand history???? You cannot understand the very simple FACT that Times Change!!!!
But “educators” know that it isn’t important that a teacher ‘know’ anything’, it is sufficient that he know ‘how to teach.’ You know, that pedagogical thingy.
Mar 7, 2008 - 10:18 pm Rogan Eelsbreath:One little idea, 400 words. I’ll never get those two minutes back.
Mar 8, 2008 - 9:01 am John N. Frary:WAIT! This can’t be a good thing. It’s not innovative.
Mar 12, 2008 - 5:29 am