Future anthropologists, pouring over the ruins of our civilization, are going to come up with some curious hieroglyphics. Consider what is happening at the Clark Art Institute in Williamstown, Massachusetts. The Clark, as anyone who has visited it knows, is a fetching small museum set in a picture-perfect New England town. It has a handful of important pictures and quite a few agreeable if second-rate ones. Alas, like most other institutions entrusted with preserving and transmitting the cultural patrimony of our civilization, it now operates as a sort of wrecking ball. Consider this bulletin about an upcoming event at the Clark:
March 13, 2008
CLARK CONVERSATION,
“HOW QUEER IS ART HISTORY,”APRIL 5 AT THE CLARK
For Immediate ReleaseWILLIAMSTOWN, MA- The complex and controversial subject of the relationship between homosexuality, queer theory and queer studies, and the discipline of art history will be discussed at the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute on Saturday, April 5, at 5:30 pm, during the Clark Conversation “How Queer is Art History?”. Admission to the conversation is free.
In recent years, queer theory has challenged some basic premises of the humanities. A group of scholars who are pioneers of thinking about how sexual identity influences the way people write about art history and the way art is made and understood have met during a two-day colloquium to discuss these topics. This public conversation will be a summary of scholars’ findings.
There you have it, folks: the cream of our great nation’s scholarly talent in art history, conjuring with the important question, “How Queer is Art History?” The world waits with breath bated for the answer to this pressing interrogation. After learning about the “findings” of these “scholars” I hope someone will propound the equally challenging question, namely “How Long Will the Public Put Up With Such Rubbish Masquerading as Serious Inquiry?” That is a conversation I would dearly like to hear.
Meanwhile, here is the press contact for the Clark: shoffman@clarkart.edu or (413) 458-0471: give ‘em a buzz and let them know what you think this “controversial subject.”
PJM Home
The New Criterion
The Rape of the Masters: How Political Correctness Sabotages Art
Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse
Art’s Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity
Experiments Against Reality: The Fate of Culture in the Postmodern Age
Tenured Radicals, NEW, EXPANDED EDITION FALL 2008! How Politics has Corrupted our Higher Education
Counterpoints: 25 Years of The New Criterion on Culture and the Arts
The Long March: How the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s Changed America
Against the Idols of the Age
Lengthened Shadows: America and Its Institutions in the Twenty-First Century
The Survival of Culture: Permanent Values in a Virtual Age
Physics and Politics, by Walter Bagehot, edited with an
Introduction by Roger Kimball
Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.
2 Comments
1. sk:Just the title betrays how boring and unoriginal these thinkers are.
I desperately wish there were a branch of sociology dedicated to studying the cultural bastions of the intellectually exhausted Left, such as academia and the journalistic establishment. I’m much more interested in the people who posed the question, “How Queer is Art History,” (note the lack of capitalization on “Is,” by the way) than I am in any conclusions they could possibly draw; much in the same way we study the Mek– because they’re interesting in themselves, not because they might be right about the world riding on the back of a giant turtle, or whatever.
Really, it is amazing there are no teams of sociologists and cultural anthropologists following the Clark curators around from board room to cocktail party, taking diligent notes. Well, perhaps, it’s because the sociologists wish they would get invited to those parties, themselves.
Mar 14, 2008 - 10:42 am 2. William:Actually most critical thinkers drop their sociology class. But I think Roger here is pointing out he real queer factor.
Mar 14, 2008 - 12:08 pm