<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tariq Ali: Fool of &#8216;68</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/03/24/tariq_ali_fool_of_68/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/03/24/tariq_ali_fool_of_68/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:05:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caryl Johnston</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/03/24/tariq_ali_fool_of_68/comment-page-1/#comment-1170</link>
		<dc:creator>Caryl Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/03/24/tariq-ali-fool-of-68/#comment-1170</guid>
		<description>&quot;The past is never dead - it&#039;s not even past&quot; - Faulkner, not Thomas Mann.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The past is never dead &#8211; it&#8217;s not even past&#8221; &#8211; Faulkner, not Thomas Mann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John N. Frary</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/03/24/tariq_ali_fool_of_68/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>John N. Frary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/03/24/tariq-ali-fool-of-68/#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>The central phenomenon of this period was the utter collapse of 1950s liberalism.  American liberals began the &#039;sixties full of ambitious projects and exalted hopes. Very little of that was left ten years later.

1968?  Gee, wasn&#039;t that the year Richard Nixon was elected president?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The central phenomenon of this period was the utter collapse of 1950s liberalism.  American liberals began the &#8217;sixties full of ambitious projects and exalted hopes. Very little of that was left ten years later.</p>
<p>1968?  Gee, wasn&#8217;t that the year Richard Nixon was elected president?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie's Farm</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/03/24/tariq_ali_fool_of_68/comment-page-1/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie's Farm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/03/24/tariq-ali-fool-of-68/#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The long march of the cultural revolution&lt;/strong&gt;

Roger Kimball on the 60s - Tariq Ali: Fool of &#039;68. A quote:“Passion,” like “idealism,” is a nostrum that the Left prescribes in order to relieve itself from the burdens of moral accountability. In a subtle essay called “Countercultures,” t...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The long march of the cultural revolution</strong></p>
<p>Roger Kimball on the 60s - Tariq Ali: Fool of &#8216;68. A quote:“Passion,” like “idealism,” is a nostrum that the Left prescribes in order to relieve itself from the burdens of moral accountability. In a subtle essay called “Countercultures,” t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
