<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Those who can do, those who can&#8217;t sue, or how do you spell &#8220;jurisdiction&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:05:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Ford</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1915</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 07:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1915</guid>
		<description>Congressional approval of suing OPEC makes about as much sense as Bush asking the Saudis to increase production and help out the Yanks.  The next logical step would be to dispatch a bipartisan group of members of Congress along with the president to India and China to urge them to cut back on oil consumption.

It may not accomplish anything but at least our elected representatives will get to visit the Taj and the Great Wall.  That&#039;s about the most bang for our buck that we seem to be getting for our tax dollars these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congressional approval of suing OPEC makes about as much sense as Bush asking the Saudis to increase production and help out the Yanks.  The next logical step would be to dispatch a bipartisan group of members of Congress along with the president to India and China to urge them to cut back on oil consumption.</p>
<p>It may not accomplish anything but at least our elected representatives will get to visit the Taj and the Great Wall.  That&#8217;s about the most bang for our buck that we seem to be getting for our tax dollars these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Laverick</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1913</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Laverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1913</guid>
		<description>One British adoption from the Subcontinent is still in use, and that is &quot;Khyber.&quot; It is rhyming slang for arse (i.e. Khyber pass)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One British adoption from the Subcontinent is still in use, and that is &#8220;Khyber.&#8221; It is rhyming slang for arse (i.e. Khyber pass)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alo Kievalar</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>Alo Kievalar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>Steve S:

Yes, military &quot;foreign&quot; terminology forms an interesting and little known subject.



As you said, &quot;KAFFIR&quot; was used by the British forces in South Africa.  It comes, of course, from the Arabic &quot;kaafir&quot; meaning &quot;disbeliever&quot;, that is, one who does not believe in Islam. (I doubt it is used at all in the British Army these days, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan...... although it would be hilarious if it were used).



Other interesting &quot;Britishism&quot; include the term &quot;SHUFTI&quot; meaning a look-see as in &quot;Take a quick shufti and see if there&#039;s anyone in that building&quot;.  This also comes from the Arabic (colloquial, in this case) SHUUF, meaning &quot;to look, to see, to perceive&quot; etc.




Finally, you might have heard of the Britishism TIFFIN meaning &quot;tea time&quot; or &quot;break time&quot;.  This word is from an Indian sub-continent language, tho I&#039;m not sure which one (probably Hindi or Tamil).




Whether any of the above terms are in current use, I don&#039;t know.  Probably not.....like the British &quot;Empire&quot;, their time has now passed and are most likely now considered quaint if understood at all, although I can&#039;t be sure since I&#039;m not British.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve S:</p>
<p>Yes, military &#8220;foreign&#8221; terminology forms an interesting and little known subject.</p>
<p>As you said, &#8220;KAFFIR&#8221; was used by the British forces in South Africa.  It comes, of course, from the Arabic &#8220;kaafir&#8221; meaning &#8220;disbeliever&#8221;, that is, one who does not believe in Islam. (I doubt it is used at all in the British Army these days, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan&#8230;&#8230; although it would be hilarious if it were used).</p>
<p>Other interesting &#8220;Britishism&#8221; include the term &#8220;SHUFTI&#8221; meaning a look-see as in &#8220;Take a quick shufti and see if there&#8217;s anyone in that building&#8221;.  This also comes from the Arabic (colloquial, in this case) SHUUF, meaning &#8220;to look, to see, to perceive&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>Finally, you might have heard of the Britishism TIFFIN meaning &#8220;tea time&#8221; or &#8220;break time&#8221;.  This word is from an Indian sub-continent language, tho I&#8217;m not sure which one (probably Hindi or Tamil).</p>
<p>Whether any of the above terms are in current use, I don&#8217;t know.  Probably not&#8230;..like the British &#8220;Empire&#8221;, their time has now passed and are most likely now considered quaint if understood at all, although I can&#8217;t be sure since I&#8217;m not British.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1894</guid>
		<description>Alo, I first heard &quot;same-o, same-o&quot; the way you describe in the Navy and have used it that way ever since.  A few years ago I started hearing, and seeing &quot;same old, same old&quot; and was puzzled since that was most definitely what I and my colleagues said.

Military people have an entire subset of slang corrupted from foreign sources.  And it&#039;s not just the US military, of course - my understanding of the manner in which &quot;kaffir&quot; became a taboo word for black in South Africa was that it had been picked up by British Army troopers from campaigns in the Sudan and Egypt, then carried down south.  They were mocking their enemies by appropriating their insult, much as the US Marines call themselves Devil Dogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alo, I first heard &#8220;same-o, same-o&#8221; the way you describe in the Navy and have used it that way ever since.  A few years ago I started hearing, and seeing &#8220;same old, same old&#8221; and was puzzled since that was most definitely what I and my colleagues said.</p>
<p>Military people have an entire subset of slang corrupted from foreign sources.  And it&#8217;s not just the US military, of course &#8211; my understanding of the manner in which &#8220;kaffir&#8221; became a taboo word for black in South Africa was that it had been picked up by British Army troopers from campaigns in the Sudan and Egypt, then carried down south.  They were mocking their enemies by appropriating their insult, much as the US Marines call themselves Devil Dogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alo Kievalar</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1892</link>
		<dc:creator>Alo Kievalar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1892</guid>
		<description>What then?  

Easy.  

Just declare a &quot;national security crisis&quot; and nationalize all Arab wealth in the USA. After all, something like 95% of Arab and OPEC dollars actually reside within US banks. 

(Where else would they put them?  Zimbabwe or Bolivian banks?  How &#039;bout Egyptian banks?]

OPEC and all may have us by the balls.
But we have them by the throat...and they know it. Some of us know it too, but aren&#039;t saying much....just yet.  

Saudi Aramco (the biggest oil company in the world) may now have a Saudi President and so on, but the critical and crucial strings are still being pulled from Houston......and they know that too.
-----------------

PS:  Linguistic Lesson specially for vb above:

The term:  &quot;same old, same old&quot;
I&#039;ve been seeing this term used more and more in blogs and so forth. You might be interested to know it&#039;s origin - and that it&#039;s being used incorrectly.

It&#039;s actually &quot;SAME-O, SAME-O&quot;.  This was a term used (and still used) by GI&#039;s in Korea and Japan mimicking, I believe, a Korean language linguistic feature in which a word is said twice and ends in an -O, as kind of &quot;baby talk&quot;.  The word is English &quot;SAME&quot; with the added &quot;Oriental&quot; - O to give it a colloquial twist to mean &quot;it&#039;s the same no matter what you do&quot;.  A professional linguist could explain it better than that, I&#039;m sure, but my point is it&#039;s not &quot;same old, same old&quot; (altho usage ultimately trumps grammar so &quot;same old same old&quot; may become widespread enough so that it becomes the standard.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What then?  </p>
<p>Easy.  </p>
<p>Just declare a &#8220;national security crisis&#8221; and nationalize all Arab wealth in the USA. After all, something like 95% of Arab and OPEC dollars actually reside within US banks. </p>
<p>(Where else would they put them?  Zimbabwe or Bolivian banks?  How &#8217;bout Egyptian banks?]</p>
<p>OPEC and all may have us by the balls.<br />
But we have them by the throat&#8230;and they know it. Some of us know it too, but aren&#8217;t saying much&#8230;.just yet.  </p>
<p>Saudi Aramco (the biggest oil company in the world) may now have a Saudi President and so on, but the critical and crucial strings are still being pulled from Houston&#8230;&#8230;and they know that too.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>PS:  Linguistic Lesson specially for vb above:</p>
<p>The term:  &#8220;same old, same old&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;ve been seeing this term used more and more in blogs and so forth. You might be interested to know it&#8217;s origin &#8211; and that it&#8217;s being used incorrectly.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s actually &#8220;SAME-O, SAME-O&#8221;.  This was a term used (and still used) by GI&#8217;s in Korea and Japan mimicking, I believe, a Korean language linguistic feature in which a word is said twice and ends in an -O, as kind of &#8220;baby talk&#8221;.  The word is English &#8220;SAME&#8221; with the added &#8220;Oriental&#8221; &#8211; O to give it a colloquial twist to mean &#8220;it&#8217;s the same no matter what you do&#8221;.  A professional linguist could explain it better than that, I&#8217;m sure, but my point is it&#8217;s not &#8220;same old, same old&#8221; (altho usage ultimately trumps grammar so &#8220;same old same old&#8221; may become widespread enough so that it becomes the standard.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Skubinna</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Skubinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess we&#039;ll just boycott their stupid oil.  That&#039;ll show them.

After all, the Democratic Party claims descent from Thomas Jefferson, and Jefferson gladly crippled the fledgling US economy to demonstrate his disapproval of England and France and that icky war thingy they were having to determine whether Europe would live under Napoleonic domination.  Since the current Republican Party is determined to avoid any suggestion that they are at all different in any way from the Dems I expect massive bipartisan consensus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess we&#8217;ll just boycott their stupid oil.  That&#8217;ll show them.</p>
<p>After all, the Democratic Party claims descent from Thomas Jefferson, and Jefferson gladly crippled the fledgling US economy to demonstrate his disapproval of England and France and that icky war thingy they were having to determine whether Europe would live under Napoleonic domination.  Since the current Republican Party is determined to avoid any suggestion that they are at all different in any way from the Dems I expect massive bipartisan consensus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Air</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>Roger--

Isn&#039;t this the perfect &quot;progressive&quot; solution to the problem of higher oil prices?

1. Provides work for trial lawyers.
2. Congresscritters can say they are &quot;doing something&quot; about gas prices.
3. Establishes moral authority (Us versus OPEC).
4. Accomplishes nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger&#8211;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this the perfect &#8220;progressive&#8221; solution to the problem of higher oil prices?</p>
<p>1. Provides work for trial lawyers.<br />
2. Congresscritters can say they are &#8220;doing something&#8221; about gas prices.<br />
3. Establishes moral authority (Us versus OPEC).<br />
4. Accomplishes nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSD</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>LSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>Exactly!  &quot;Stop it or I&#039;ll hit you with my indignation!&quot;

And, apparently, these followers of the faith have some holy text that informs them that the prohibition of drilling on domestic soil makes them better stewards of the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!  &#8220;Stop it or I&#8217;ll hit you with my indignation!&#8221;</p>
<p>And, apparently, these followers of the faith have some holy text that informs them that the prohibition of drilling on domestic soil makes them better stewards of the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vb</title>
		<link>http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>vb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 12:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerkimball/2008/05/21/those-who-can-do-those-who-cant-sue-or-how-do-you-spell-jurisdiction/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>This is the same old, same old. Draft a UN resolution on women&#039;s rights, sign a ceasefire with Saddam, negotiate an ineffective Kyoto protocol: without enforcement these things are worthless; try enforcement and you beome a pariah. I&#039;d prefer that we sue the bloviators for destroying trees to publish their pipe dreams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the same old, same old. Draft a UN resolution on women&#8217;s rights, sign a ceasefire with Saddam, negotiate an ineffective Kyoto protocol: without enforcement these things are worthless; try enforcement and you beome a pariah. I&#8217;d prefer that we sue the bloviators for destroying trees to publish their pipe dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
