Roger’s Rules

July 5th, 2008 3:56 am

British “tyranny” and Obama’s tax plan

Yesterday, in my post “Obama: Ask not what you can do for your country, but what your country can do to you,” I quoted PrestoPundit, who animadverted about Obama’s latest effort to bring us all up close and personal with the engine of the government by requiring high school and college students labor on behalf of various governmental “service programs” (”we’ll make federal assistance conditional on school districts developing service programs, and give schools resources [for "resources" read "your tax dollars"] to offer new service opportunities,” etc. etc.). PrestoPundit suggested this was a step down the road towards good old-fashioned European serfdom, and I have to say I agree. But he also went on to make this Fourth-of-July point: “Barack Obama somehow believes that advocacy of a return to European style serfdom is a good way to celebrate the American Declaration of Independence from the oppression of English tyranny.” I’m as pleased as anyone that the American Revolution turned out the way it did. But for those of you salivating over the prospect of an Obama administration, I’d like to share a note I received from a canny English reader:

‘Oppression of British tyranny’?!

The colonies were taxed at 10 percent of British metropolitan rates and most of that was spent on protecting them from the French and Indians. Obama’s 56 percent marginal tax rate will put British ‘tyranny’ into better perspective for you …

Comment
Bookmark and Share
Digg Print Digg PJM Home

Pajamas Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

The clause regarding "hate speech" has been deleted because readers criticized it as being too loosely defined. We agreed.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that Pajamas Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pajamasmedia.com.

2 Comments

1. Bill Bradley:

You may have zero comments because you are, not to put too fine a point on it, totally wrong … :)

Jul 7, 2008 - 9:04 am 2. Jill:

Quote: ‘Oppression of British tyranny’?!

The colonies were taxed at 10 percent of British metropolitan rates and most of that was spent on protecting them from the French and Indians. Obama’s 56 percent marginal tax rate will put British ‘tyranny’ into better perspective for you …END Quote

Amen, Sister! Well, not all of it was for the protection of the English colonists. Some of it went to the English governors, who were stealing. And, of course, Great Britain didn’t allow colonies to free trade…In some ways, nothing has changed. Your English reader makes an excellent point.

Jul 17, 2008 - 9:34 am

Write a Comment

Name: (required, displayed)
Email: (required, not publicized)
URL: (optional, displayed)
Comments: